<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with dahlialithwick</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/dahlialithwick</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'dahlialithwick' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:12:01 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:12:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Saving Face</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84959/Saving%2DFace</link>
		<description> Dahlia Lithwick (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/78190/Three-Opinions-On-What-to-Do-With-the-Bush-Administrations-Misdeeds&quot;&gt;pr&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/46463/The-onesided-debate-about-judges&quot;&gt;e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/65272/Fear-of-a-Left-Planet&quot;&gt;vi&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/64044/Rally-Squads-ORLY-RLY&quot;&gt;o&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/30046/The-secret-lovechild-of-Rush-Limbaugh-and-Perry-Mason&quot;&gt;us&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/29855/My-name-is-Misty-and-I-think-I-maybe-got-married-last-night-Could-someone-call-me-back-and-tell-me-if-I-could-get-an-annulment-Im-at-Circus-Circus&quot;&gt;l&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/17991/&quot;&gt;y&lt;/a&gt;) is trying to write &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2227201/&quot;&gt;a chick-lit novel&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2227430/pagenum/all/&quot;&gt;nineteen days&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84959</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:12:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chicklit</category>
		<category>dahlialithwick</category>
		<category>fiction</category>
		<category>realtime</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<dc:creator>Iridic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The one-sided &quot;debate&quot; about judges</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46463/The%2Donesided%2Ddebate%2Dabout%2Djudges</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2129374/&quot;&gt; Dahlia Lithwick&lt;/a&gt; in Slate urges Democrats to grow a spine, and  use the Alito hearings to  provide the American public with some liberal talking points for a change.
&lt;i&gt;&quot;If the Scalias, Thomases, Alitos, and Borks of the world had their way ... there would be no meaningful gun control. States could have official churches. Hard-fought federal worker, environmental, and civil rights protections would disintegrate. What you currently think of as the right to privacy would disappear. These are the questions Senate Democrats need to ask of Sam Alito: Should property rights trump individual rights? Should the right to privacy be interpreted as narrowly as the framers might have intended? Do you believe that a return to the morals and mores of two centuries ago is in the best interest of this nation?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46463</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:15:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dahlialithwick</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>snoktruix</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


