<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with deadlink and politics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/deadlink+politics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'deadlink' and 'politics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 23:39:59 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 23:39:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Naughty!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43540/Naughty</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/07/why_imovie_shou.html"&gt;There are 7 words you can&apos;t say in kindergarden.&lt;/a&gt; Caution: contains foul language and political thought.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43540</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 23:39:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>profanity</category>
		<dc:creator>growabrain</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20014/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.hscb.org/"&gt;Homeland Security Cultural Bureau.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;HSCB is protecting the interests of the country&apos;s national security by employing efforts to direct and guide the parameters of cultural production. &quot; Actions include encouraging Hollywood to make less cynical, more patriotic movies, and shutting down art galleries whose subversive content is a threat to national security. I presume the site is a parodic/political commentary one--since as far as I know such a bureau has not actually been authorized by the Bush White House--but the makers of the site are holding their cards very close to the chest, with content that is nearly indistinguishable from what the real thing (a Bushian arts censorship commission) would actually be.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20014</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2002 19:28:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>homelandsecurity</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>satire</category>
		<dc:creator>Rebis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19135/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.rollcall.com/pages/features/00/wbc/02/01/wbc0121i.html"&gt;The 50 richest members of US Congress,&lt;/a&gt; each with a net worth ranging from $3.3 mil to $675 mil.  Looks like a mostly even mix among the parties, with a heavy California contingent.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19135</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:26:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>wealth</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18855/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/printedition/ny-livit302803771jul30.column?coll=ny%2Dnews%2Dprint"&gt;Corporate Welfare and Social Welfare. &lt;/a&gt; Which is the most egregious?  A bill in Congress to address welfare got comments from GWB during a political fund raiser in SC.  Does this statement make any sense to you?

&quot;In the way they&apos;re kind of writing it right now out of the Senate Finance Committee, some people could spend their entire five years on welfare - there&apos;s a five-year work requirement - going to college. Now, that&apos;s not my view of helping people become independent, and it&apos;s certainly not my view of understanding the importance of work and helping people achieve the dignity necessary so they can live a free life, free from government control.&quot; -GWB- 

I always thought education WAS the key to escaping poverty but the &quot;education President&quot; obviously disagrees. I&apos;d really appreciate your comments on the bill and this article.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18855</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2002 08:28:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>corporatewelfare</category>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>socialwelfare</category>
		<category>welfare</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18749/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wjla.com/news/showstory.hrb?f=n&amp;amp;s=51069&amp;amp;f1=nat"&gt;Clinton Fires Back at Republican Accusations&lt;/a&gt; &quot;There was corporate malfeasance both before he took office and after. The difference is I actually tried to do something about it and their party stopped it. And one of the people who stopped our attempt to stop Enron accounting was made chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission.&quot; He also talks about the Middle East and the related &quot;Blame Clinton&quot; movement. I can hear the teeth gnashing already.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18749</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2002 16:19:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>billclinton</category>
		<category>clinton</category>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>enron</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>sec</category>
		<category>williamjeffersonclinton</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12263/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/mattv.htm"&gt;President Gore?&lt;/a&gt; The recount results are in. Will this only serve to undermine Bush&apos;s authority in a time of crisis? Should the media have sat on this until the current situation becomes more stable?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12263</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2001 18:48:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>algore</category>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>gore</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>recount</category>
		<dc:creator>Bezuhin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


