<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with debate and media</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/debate+media</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'debate' and 'media' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:54:11 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:54:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Scoops, Swoops, and Perry&apos;s &quot;Oops.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/109304/Scoops%2DSwoops%2Dand%2DPerrys%2DOops</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Texas Governor and GOP presidential candidate Rick Perry is booked on all the major morning shows tomorrow, and with good reason.

After two months of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/rick-perry-familys-hunting-camp-still-known-to-many-by-old-racially-charged-name/2011/10/01/gIQAOhY5DL_story.html&quot;&gt;gaffes&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://cnsnews.com/news/article/immigration-vaccines-are-tough-sells-perry-among-conservatives&quot;&gt;impolitic stands&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7M4gz97Y9W8&quot;&gt;bizarre speeches&lt;/a&gt; that quickly waned his &lt;a href=&quot;http://i.imgur.com/ZVlvz.png&quot;&gt;once-strong odds&lt;/a&gt; of winning the Republican nomination, Perry went into Wednesday&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2011/11/cnbc_republican_debate_transcr.html&quot;&gt;CNBC debate&lt;/a&gt; sorely needing a win... only to deliver &lt;a href=&quot;http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/09/for-perry-a-cringe-worthy-gaffe/&quot;&gt;a tortuous, cringingly forgetful attempt&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUA2rDVrmNg&quot;&gt;video&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt; to recall just which three cabinet departments he&apos;d vowed to abolish, a stunning failure political scientist Larry Sabato deemed &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/#!/LarrySabato/status/134456057018855425&quot;&gt;&quot;the most devastating moment of any modern primary debate&quot;&lt;/a&gt; in his memory.

While Perry&apos;s slow-motion flameout has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-1452.html&quot;&gt;boosted the fortunes&lt;/a&gt; of dark horse candidate Herman Cain, the unlikely challenger is facing troubles of his own in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/herman-cain-faces-sexual-harassment-allegations-from-fourth-woman/2011/11/07/gIQA8mZOxM_story.html&quot;&gt;a volley of sexual harassment claims&lt;/a&gt; -- an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/cain-rises-in-post-abc-poll-despite-scandal-most-republicans-dismiss-allegations/2011/11/04/gIQApcgSlM_story.html&quot;&gt;oddly ineffective&lt;/a&gt; scandal Cain is doing his best to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/11/08/herman-cain-denies-new-sexual-harassment-allegations-by-sharon-bialek.html&quot;&gt;(somewhat dubiously) disavow&lt;/a&gt;. If Cain collapses, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2011-11-09/cain-gingrich-gop-race/51140456/1?csp=34news&quot;&gt;may reap the benefits&lt;/a&gt;, but his moribund campaign &lt;a href=&quot;http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/09/gingrich-rises-in-polls-but-has-major-obstacles-to-nomination/&quot;&gt;has issues of its own&lt;/a&gt;. Pawlenty, Bachmann, Perry, Christie, Cain, Gingrich... the base is loathe to rally round him, but after so many failed, flawed, or forfeited challenges, &lt;a href=&quot;http://nationalmemo.com/article/can-any-republican-compete-mitt-romney-now&quot;&gt;can anyone topple Mitt Romney?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2011:site.109304</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:54:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2012</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>election2012</category>
		<category>gaffe</category>
		<category>gingrich</category>
		<category>gop</category>
		<category>hermancain</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>mittromney</category>
		<category>newtgingrich</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<category>oops</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>primary</category>
		<category>republican</category>
		<category>rickperry</category>
		<category>romney</category>
		<category>scandal</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>Rhaomi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I agree with Nick: you&apos;re no Jack Kennedy.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/91117/I%2Dagree%2Dwith%2DNick%2Dyoure%2Dno%2DJack%2DKennedy</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7596178/TV-election-debate-Nick-Cleggs-star-rises-in-great-showdown.html&quot;&gt;Yesterday, the leaders of the three largest political parties in the UK&lt;/a&gt; engaged in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7099620.ece&quot;&gt;live televised election debate&lt;/a&gt; for the first time in history. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/apr/15/leaders-debate-nick-clegg-tv&quot;&gt;Most&lt;/a&gt; commentators &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7596570/Nick-Cleggs-TV-debate-performance-changed-election-dynamic-says-Ashdown.html&quot;&gt;seem&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Leaders-Debates-Tory-Leader-David-Cameron-Says-Nick-Clegg-Had-A-Good-Debate/Article/201004315604524?f=rss&quot;&gt;agree&lt;/a&gt; that Nick Clegg, the leader of Britain&apos;s perennial third party the Liberal Democrats, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/election_2010/8625850.stm&quot;&gt;made the best impression&lt;/a&gt; in yesterday&apos;s first of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_general_election_debates,_2010&quot;&gt;three weekly debates&lt;/a&gt; leading up to the general election on May 6. The  progressive-leaning Guardian even goes so far as to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/apr/16/nick-clegg-guardian-icm-poll-pm&quot;&gt;claim that he is now prime ministerial material&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This being Metafilter you will undoubtedly ask, &quot;how does Cory Doctorow figure into all of this?&quot; Well, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/apr/16/digital-economy-act-cory-doctorow&quot;&gt;he agrees&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/lib-dems-will-call-for-repeal-of-digital-economy-act-683988&quot;&gt;with Nick&lt;/a&gt; on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Economy_Act_2010&quot;&gt;Digital Economy Act&lt;/a&gt;. Then again, Nick is &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.twitter.com/search?q=iagreewithnick&quot;&gt;agreed with&lt;/a&gt; quite a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/16/leaders-tv-debates-jonathan-freedland&quot;&gt;lot&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.91117</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:05:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>clegg</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<category>davidcameron</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>debates</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>ge2010</category>
		<category>generalelection</category>
		<category>gordonbrown</category>
		<category>iagreewithnick</category>
		<category>labour</category>
		<category>libdem</category>
		<category>libdems</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>nickclegg</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>tories</category>
		<category>tory</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>ukpolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Murdoch v. the BBC</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84662/Murdoch%2Dv%2Dthe%2DBBC</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/aug/30/robert-peston-james-murdoch-bbc"&gt;&quot;If you think you can get fucking angry, I can get fucking angry.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; James Murdoch, Chairman of News Corp, gave this year&apos;s MacTaggart Lecture &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/video/2009/aug/29/james-murdoch-edinburgh-festival-mactaggart&quot;&gt;(vid)&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/comment/james-murdochs-mactaggart-speech/5004990.article&quot;&gt;(transcript)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt; in which he delivered a broadside on the role of the BBC, accusing it of &apos;dumping&apos; news on the commercial market.  An &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2009/08/what_future_for_media_and_jour.html&quot;&gt;alternative view was given by the BBC&apos;s Robert Peston,&lt;/a&gt; who asked &quot;Should we be relaxed if &apos;can&apos;t pay&apos; means &apos;can&apos;t know&apos;?&quot; Their after-dinner discussions led to a &apos;vigorous exchange of views.&apos;

There was a &lt;a href=&quot;bbc%20http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/6111007/James-Murdoch-doesnt-go-far-enough-slash-the-BBCs-budget-by-a-third.html&quot;&gt;mixed &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2009/aug/31/charging-for-content-bbc&quot;&gt;reception &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b788da8c-95c4-11de-90e0-00144feabdc0.html&quot;&gt;to the speech&lt;/a&gt; in the UK media, and even The Wire&apos;s dominic West &lt;a href=&quot;http://deadlinescotland.wordpress.com/2009/08/30/9104-1726/&quot;&gt;got in on the act.&lt;/a&gt;

Previous MacTaggart speakers include &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-790841440769145720&quot;&gt;Dennis Potter&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1561287/In-full-Jeremy-Paxmans-MacTaggart-Lecture.html&quot;&gt;Jeremy Paxman,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2005/aug/22/edinburghtvfestival2005.bbc&quot;&gt;amongst &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mgeitf.co.uk/home/thefestival/about-the-festival.aspx/past_mactaggart_lecture_speakers&quot;&gt;others.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84662</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:00:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>lecture</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>murdoch</category>
		<category>newscorp</category>
		<category>peston</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>Jakey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dagger of the Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81457/Dagger%2Dof%2Dthe%2DMind</link>
		<description> The SF Signal &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/cat_interviews/mind_meld.html&quot;&gt;Mind Meld&lt;/a&gt; feature poses science fiction related questions to a number of SF luminaries and the scientist, science writer or blogger. Subjects have included &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2009/04/mind-meld-the-best-women-writers-in-sff/&quot;&gt;the best women writers in SF&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2009/03/mind-meld-taboo-topics-in-sff-literature/&quot;&gt;taboo topics in SF&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/mind-meld-underrated-authors/&quot;&gt;underated authors&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/07/mind-meld-what-are-the-most-controversial-sff-novels-of-the-past-present/&quot;&gt;the most controversial SF novels of the past and present&lt;/a&gt;. The also cover lighter topics, such &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/09/mind-meld-how-do-media-tie-in-novels-affect-sff/&quot;&gt;the role of media tie-ins&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2009/04/mind-meld-battlestar-galactica-finale-draft/&quot;&gt;how Battlestar Galactica could have ended better&lt;/a&gt; (bonus &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2009/05/mind-meld-make-up-test-with-geoff-ryman/&quot;&gt;Geoff Ryman&lt;/a&gt;) and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2009/05/mind-meld-the-most-realistic-and-the-most-ridiculous-uses-of-science-in-scifi-film-and-tv/&quot;&gt;the realistic (or otherwise) use of science on TV SF shows&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81457</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:01:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>battlestargalactica</category>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>BSG</category>
		<category>controversy</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>fiction</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>gender</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>mindmeld</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>realism</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>ScienceFiction</category>
		<category>sfsignal</category>
		<category>taboo</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>tieins</category>
		<category>underrated</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<category>writing</category>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>...resources that could prove pivotal to understanding and better contending the central struggles of our time are underutilized ...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47039/resources%2Dthat%2Dcould%2Dprove%2Dpivotal%2Dto%2Dunderstanding%2Dand%2Dbetter%2Dcontending%2Dthe%2Dcentral%2Dstruggles%2Dof%2Dour%2Dtime%2Dare%2Dunderutilized</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.talk2action.org/story/2005/11/22/115617/98"&gt;Talk To Action and Mother Jones mag team up for e-conference tomorrow:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;...a day of thoughtful reflections on, and vigorous discussion of the role of religion and government -- as intended by the framers of the constitution, and the situation we face today. &lt;/i&gt; (MoJo&apos;s December issue is all about the role of religion and government, including this on Reconstructionists: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/12/a_nation_under_god.html&quot;&gt;A Nation Under God.&lt;/a&gt;) New and old media officially collaborating to highlight specific issues and futher debate--a first?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47039</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:03:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brainstorming</category>
		<category>Christian</category>
		<category>churchstate</category>
		<category>collaboration</category>
		<category>conference</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


