<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with defense and brokenlink</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/defense+brokenlink</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'defense' and 'brokenlink' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2001 10:29:51 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2001 10:29:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11220/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.defenselink.mil/bios/secdef_bio.html"&gt;Donald Rumsfeld&lt;/a&gt; from Dep of Defense  biography ....&quot;Mr. Rumsfeld served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of General Instrument Corporation from 1990 to 1993. A leader in broadband transmission, distribution, and access control technologies for cable, satellite and terrestrial broadcasting applications, the company pioneered the development of the first all-digital high definition television (HDTV) technology&quot;.

...boy that must feel like 100 years ago....  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11220</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2001 10:29:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biographary</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<category>secretaryofdefense</category>
		<dc:creator>Voyageman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10890/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.atnewyork.com/news/article/0,1471,8471_893051,00.html"&gt;The Few, The Proud, the Geeky&lt;/a&gt; &quot;U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has called for the creation of the technology equivalent of the National Guard: &apos;That&apos;s what I&apos;d like to propose. What this country needs is essentially a technology equivalent of the National Guard: a National Emergency Technology Guard - NET Guard - that in times of crisis would be in a position to mobilize our nation&apos;s information technology, or IT, community to action quickly, just as the National Guard is ready to move during emergencies.&apos;&quot; Akk! Volunteer geeks on patrol!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10890</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:43:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>IT</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>RonWyden</category>
		<dc:creator>bclark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10233/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.observer.com/pages/conason.asp"&gt;Is the Missle Defense System dead?&lt;/a&gt; The rules have changed, they say, but many of us have used this argument against SDI all along.&lt;i&gt; What happened on Sept. 11 demonstrated irrefutably that any enemy determined to inflict mass destruction upon America can do so without ballistic missiles. &lt;/i&gt;

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10233</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:47:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>missledefense</category>
		<category>missles</category>
		<category>sdi</category>
		<dc:creator>BarneyFifesBullet</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9030/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20010715/aponline102341_000.htm"&gt;Bull&apos;s Eye!&lt;/a&gt; $100 million well spent or the first steps on the road to hell? (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drudgereport.com/&quot;&gt;matt drudge&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9030</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2001 12:29:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>MissileDefense</category>
		<category>missiles</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8176/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ravenszone.net/pressbox/headlinenews/news.asp"&gt;It worked in the Super Bowl... it can work as our military strategy!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;p&gt;The main quote in this article is, &quot;I think our allies need to look at the Baltimore Ravens. They&apos;ll realize good defense wins. A good defense is one which adjusts to the times. A good defense is modern. A good defense is clear.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So let&apos;s build lots of missles!&lt;/p&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8176</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2001 19:09:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Baltimore</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>football</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>missiles</category>
		<category>Ravens</category>
		<dc:creator>goto11</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5723/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/9870.html"&gt;A good explanation of why a missile defense shield should be pursued.&lt;/a&gt; Granted, the tech may not be up to the challenge yet, but that&apos;s no reason not to try to build it.  And if, God forbid, someone was to launch a nuke this way, it would give us a chance of avoiding having to turn someone&apos;s country into a glass-covered parking lot.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5723</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2001 07:11:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>IHT</category>
		<category>missile</category>
		<category>shield</category>
		<dc:creator>CRS</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5551/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,21493,00.html"&gt;There will always be a lawyer.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Internet intoxication&quot;? This is worse than twinkies.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5551</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2001 18:05:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>intoxication</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lawyers</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5520/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.excite.com/news/ap/010126/15/news-rumsfeld"&gt;&quot;President Bush intends to move ahead with a national missile defense plan &lt;/a&gt; despite objections from Russia and other countries.&quot;  Is it just me, or is Bush on some kind of mission to destroy America as we know it?  Does anyone still believe that  America is under threat of nuclear annhilation? (other than Dubya?)  We are &lt;b&gt;so&lt;/b&gt; screwed.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5520</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2001 13:14:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>defence</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>missile</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<dc:creator>liquidgnome</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


