<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with defense and government</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/defense+government</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'defense' and 'government' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:47:40 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:47:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>And You Thought HAARP Was Just Tinfoil?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68432/And%2DYou%2DThought%2DHAARP%2DWas%2DJust%2DTinfoil</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7781018502399592923"&gt;The HF Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP)&lt;/a&gt; (a Google Video) radio signals are clearly heard in the 40 meter band, echoing off the Moon. This video shows S-meter readings as seen on a Yaesu FT-1000MP amateur radio (ham radio) transceiver located in San Jose, California.

And of course a thorough explanation of what you are watching/hearing can be found on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/mbann.html&quot;&gt;About the HAARP - LWA Moon Bounce Experiment&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68432</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:47:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antenna</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>HAARP</category>
		<category>hamradio</category>
		<category>moonbounce</category>
		<category>radio</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>jackspace</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Common Good</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65422/The%2DCommon%2DGood</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.governmentisgood.com/index.php&quot; title=&quot;This site challenges many of common criticisms of government &#8211; that it is massively wasteful, incompetent, the enemy of economic prosperity, etc. An objective examination of the actual record of government reveals that most of these charges are exaggerated, misleading, or simply wrong.&quot;&gt;Government is good.&lt;/a&gt; An unapologetic defense of a vital institution. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.governmentisgood.com/articles.php?aid=6&quot; title=&quot;providing roads and sewers and other essential infrastructure facilities, preventing economic depressions, eliminating horrible diseases like polio and smallpox, ensuring drinkable water and breathable air, dispensing justice, providing retirement security, preventing business abuses, sponsoring stunning scientific breakthroughs, feeding the hungry, recalling unsafe products, educating our children, reducing workplace injuries and deaths, responding to disasters and emergencies, preventing crime, protecting civil liberties, rescuing endangered species, ensuring the safety of drugs, guarding our national security, caring for the elderly...&quot;&gt; We Need to Stand Up for Government&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.governmentisgood.com/articles.php?aid=7&quot; title=&quot;Or consider the bold challenge uttered by Rush Limbaugh on one of his radio shows: &apos;With the exception of the military, I defy you to name one government program that has worked and alleviated the problem it was created to solve. Hhhmmmmmmm? I&apos;m waiting. . . . Time&apos;s up.&apos;&quot;&gt;The Forgotten Achievements of Government&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.governmentisgood.com/articles.php?aid=21&quot; title=&quot;Apparently even a conservative administration cannot deny this [...] the record clearly shows that Americans are much better off for having these rules and regulations.&quot;&gt;How Government is Good for Business&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.governmentisgood.com/articles.php?aid=23&quot; title=&quot;But my argument has not been that there is nothing wrong this institution &#8211; only that it is not what conservatives say it is. It is simply not the case that government grossly overtaxes us, or that bureaucracies are incredibly wasteful, or that big brother is constantly threatening our freedoms. What is wrong is something altogether different &#8211; and something more disturbing. The main fault of our government is that it is not as democratic as it should be.&quot;&gt;What is Really Wrong with Government&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.governmentisgood.com/articles.php?aid=24&quot; title=&quot;The first is to lessen the economic inequality in the private sphere that is being translated to political inequality in the public sphere. The second is to attempt to erect institutional barriers that prevent private power for being easily converted to political advantage. A third approach is to reform the voting process itself so that it becomes more democratic and more empowering to average voters.&quot;&gt;How to Fix It&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.governmentisgood.com/articles.php?aid=1&quot; title=&quot;Let&#8217;s examine a typical day in the life of an average middle-class American and try to identify some of the ways that government improves that person&#8217;s life during that 24 hour period.&quot;&gt;A Day in Your Life&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ezraklein.typepad.com/blog/2007/10/a-day-in-your-l.html&quot;&gt;(via)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65422</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:24:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bureaucracy</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>liberals</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>socialprograms</category>
		<dc:creator>edverb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20625/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reason.com/0210/artifact.shtml"&gt;&quot;Suppose you&apos;re devising a logo for a new wing of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency,&lt;/a&gt; an office charged with developing intelligence tools and integrating the government&apos;s existing surveillance networks. Suppose that it has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Paranoid.htm&quot;&gt;vaguely sinister&lt;/a&gt; name&#8212;say, the Information Awareness Office&#8212;and that it&apos;s to be run by a former Iran-contra conspirator. What would your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reason.com/0210/iaologo.gif&quot;&gt;design&lt;/a&gt; be?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20625</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2002 19:05:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>informationawareness</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<dc:creator>zztzed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10705/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7187-2001Sep21.html"&gt;National Defense Panel predicted WTC-style attack in 1997.&lt;/a&gt; Also contains link to report. Haven&apos;t read it yet (it&apos;s pretty long), so I don&apos;t know what it suggests. But apparently the Administration is paying attention now. &quot;Unanticipated asymmetries,&quot; indeed.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10705</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:24:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>september11</category>
		<dc:creator>aflakete</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


