<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with democracy and brokenlink</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/democracy+brokenlink</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'democracy' and 'brokenlink' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 04:38:15 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 04:38:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Prone to Violence</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48092/Prone%2Dto%2DViolence</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nationalinterest.org/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&amp;amp;nm=&amp;amp;type=Publishing&amp;amp;mod=Publications::Article&amp;amp;mid=1ABA92EFCD8348688A4EBEB3D69D33EF&amp;amp;tier=4&amp;amp;id=46FB6DB413A94CA3BA62C68AC0D46181"&gt;Prone to Violence&lt;/a&gt; FROM THE French Revolution to contemporary Iraq, the beginning phase of democratization in unsettled circumstances has often spurred a rise in militant nationalism. Democracy means rule by the people, but when territorial control and popular loyalties are in flux, a prior question has to be settled: Which people will form the nation? Nationalist politicians vie for popular support to answer that question in a way that suits their purposes. When groups are at loggerheads and the rules guiding domestic politics are unclear, the answer is more often based on a test of force and political manipulation than on democratic procedures.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48092</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 04:38:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>Democratization</category>
		<category>IraqiOccupation</category>
		<category>IraqiPolitics</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>NationalInterest</category>
		<category>nationalism</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>SelfGovernment</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Tending the Flame of Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26328/Tending%2Dthe%2DFlame%2Dof%2DDemocracy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ourfuture.org/document.cfm?documentID=962 "&gt;&quot;Our nation can no more survive as half democracy and half oligarchy than it could survive &apos;half slave and half free&apos;&quot;&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0610-11.htm&quot;&gt;alternative non-PDF link&lt;/a&gt;). &quot;Understanding the real interests and deep opinions of the American people is the first thing. And what are those? That a Social Security card is not a private portfolio statement but a membership ticket in a society where we all contribute to a common treasury so that none need face the indignities of poverty in old age without that help. That tax evasion is not a form of conserving investment capital but a brazen abandonment of responsibility to the country. That income inequality is not a sign of freedom-of-opportunity at work, because if it persists and grows, then unless you believe that some people are naturally born to ride and some to wear saddles, it&apos;s a sign that opportunity is less than equal. That self-interest is a great motivator for production and progress, but is amoral unless contained within the framework of community. That the rich have the right to buy more cars than anyone else, more homes, vacations, gadgets and gizmos, but they do not have the right to buy more democracy than anyone else.&quot;  &lt;br&gt;Bill Moyers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/thebeat/index.mhtml?bid=1&amp;pid=739&quot;&gt;&quot;tends the flame of democracy.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26328</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:21:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>billmoyers</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>editorial</category>
		<category>moyers</category>
		<dc:creator>fold_and_mutilate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Civil Disobedience-Thoreau</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24524/Civil%2DDisobedienceThoreau</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cs.indiana.edu/statecraft/civ.dis.html"&gt;Civil Disobedience-Henry David Thoreau&lt;/a&gt; Nothing in here about blocking traffic but a very important historical document for our time.

&quot;The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can act through it. Witness the present Mexican war, the work of comparatively a few individuals using the standing government as their tool; for in the outset, the people would not have consented to this measure.&quot;..................
............
&quot;A democracy, is a progress toward a true respect for the individual. Even the Chinese philosopher was wise enough to regard the individual as the basis of the empire. Is a democracy, such as we know it, the last improvement possible in government? Is it not possible to take a step further towards recognizing and organizing the rights of man? There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are derived, and treats him accordingly. &quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24524</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 21:54:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>civildisobedience</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>henrydavidthoreau</category>
		<category>individual</category>
		<category>individuality</category>
		<category>state</category>
		<category>thoreau</category>
		<dc:creator>thedailygrowl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Blowback: The Cost And Consequences of American Empire plus War And Conflict In The Post-Cold War, Post-9/11 Era</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24247/Blowback%2DThe%2DCost%2DAnd%2DConsequences%2Dof%2DAmerican%2DEmpire%2Dplus%2DWar%2DAnd%2DConflict%2DIn%2DThe%2DPostCold%2DWar%2DPost911%2DEra</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jpri.org/boa/cjohnson.html&quot; title=&quot;CHALMERS JOHNSON was born in 1931 in Phoenix and raised in Buckeye, Arizona. After World War II, in which his father served in the Navy in the Pacific, his family moved to Alameda, California, where he finished high school and earned a B.A. in economics at the University of California, Berkeley. He first saw Japan and Korea in 1953, when he served in the Navy during the Korean War. Returning to Berkeley, he switched fields and earned both his M.A. and Ph.D. in political science. In 1962, he began teaching political science at Berkeley, and did so until 1988, when he moved to the San Diego campus of the University of California. He retired in 1992. At Berkeley he served as chairman of the Center for Chinese Studies from 1967 until 1972. He was elected a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1976. Johnson has written numerous articles and reviews and some twelve books on Asian subjects, including Peasant Nationalism and Communist Power on the Chinese revolution, An Instance of Treason on Japan&apos;s most famous spy, Revolutionary Change on the theory of violent protest movements, and MITI and the Japanese Miracle on Japanese economic development. This last-named book laid the foundation for the &apos;&apos;revisionist&apos;&apos; school of writers on Japan, and because of it the Japanese press dubbed him the &apos;&apos;Godfather of revisionism.&apos;&apos;&quot;&gt;Chalmers Johnson&lt;/a&gt; is an provocative proponent of the &lt;i&gt;American Empire&lt;/i&gt; theory, indeed. Here are excerpts from his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blowback_CJohnson/Blowback_CJohnson.html&quot; title=&quot;Contents: Stealth Imperialism, South Korea: Legacy of the Cold War &amp; North Korea: Endgame of the Cold War, China: State of the Revolution, Japan and the Economics of the American Empire, Meltdown, The Consequences of Empire Quotations&quot;&gt;Blow Back: The Cost And Consequences of American Empire&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I heard Johnson interviewed on Episode II, &lt;i&gt;War And Conflict In The Post-Cold War, Post-9/11 Era&lt;/i&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://world.law.harvard.edu/show2.html&quot; title=&quot;In this hour of the Whole Wide World, we&apos;ll take a museum-like tour of the theories of this war. Those interviewed are: Samuel Huntington, author of the now-famous &apos;&apos;Clash of Civilizations&apos;&apos; theory; Chalmers Johnson an expert on Asian politics and society and provocative proponent of the &apos;&apos;American Empire&apos;&apos; theory; Michael Clare, an economist of war; Akbar Ahmed, anthropologist of the Arab world and theorist on global Islam; Christopher Hedges, war correspondent for the New York Times; Robert Fiske, Lebanon-based journalist for the London Independent; and Seamus Heaney, Irish poet and Nobel laureate. &quot;&gt;The Whole Wide World&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;The Cold War and its central conflict - the physical and ideological battles between the United States, the Soviet Union and their proxy states - imposed a certain logic and consistency on the world. Take that away and add the bloody wars in the Balkans, Africa and the Middle East in the &#8216;90s as well as the terror attacks and warnings of more recent times and you get a very confused picture of a world at war. Is this breaking storm in Iraq about oil, democracy, freedom, empire, culture, water, diamonds, modernizing Islam or nation building in the Middle East? Some, one or all of these things?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was an excellent program and well worth your listen, either by RA now or mp3 later. &lt;i&gt;(From listening to the radio)&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24247</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2003 01:43:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>americanempire</category>
		<category>blowback</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>chalmers</category>
		<category>conflict</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>diamonds</category>
		<category>empire</category>
		<category>freedom</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>johnson</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>nationbuilding</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>post911</category>
		<category>postcoldwar</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>unitedstatesofamerica</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>water</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A &apos;minifesto&apos; for the constitution of virtual, post-national states</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23898/A%2Dminifesto%2Dfor%2Dthe%2Dconstitution%2Dof%2Dvirtual%2Dpostnational%2Dstates</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://v-2.org/displayArticle.php?article_num=339"&gt;The minimal compact: An open-source constitution for post-national states.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;What sorts of arrangements of power between humans can account for the deep variation in beliefs and assumptions among the six billion of us who share this planet, while still providing for a common jurisprudence? What measures can be taken that enhance the common security without unduly infringing on the sovereignty of the individual?
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I believe that a useful model for the desired structure can be found in the open-source or &quot;free&quot; software movement.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Our own &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/user.mefi/14519&quot;&gt;adamgreenfield&lt;/a&gt; has been thinking about &lt;a href=&quot;http://joi.ito.com/static/emergentdemocracy.html&quot;&gt;emergent democracy&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/soc082bd.html&quot;&gt;widening gap between power and politics&lt;/a&gt;, and has written a &apos;minifesto,&apos; and would like some feedback. Democracy for the rest of us : fascinating, &apos;deep geek&apos; stuff, and worth your time.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23898</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2003 23:13:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AdamGreenfield</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>emergent</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<dc:creator>stavrosthewonderchicken</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18450/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.americanheritage.com/AMHER/2002/03/beer.shtml"&gt;Does Beer Really Equal Democracy Equal The U.S.A?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;b&gt;Max Rudin&apos;s &lt;/b&gt;somewhat wild assumptions only make this article of his more interesting. But is it true that beer in North America overtakes all the usual class, status and income boundaries? If so, it certainly sets it apart from Europe, where all the old preconceptions and habits still prevail and (at least in the Southwest) a glass of wine is always cheaper than a beer. So I guess the question here is: just how &lt;b&gt;political&lt;/b&gt; can beer be? [&lt;small&gt;As a chaser, the British expert &lt;b&gt;Michael Jackson&apos;s &lt;/b&gt; list of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanheritage.com/AMHER/2002/03/beer.shtml#tenbest&quot;&gt;ten great beers of America &lt;/a&gt;seems authoritative and tempting, if a tad disloyal to the cask-conditioned real, &lt;b&gt;live&lt;/b&gt; ales of England and Scotland...&lt;/small&gt;].  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18450</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2002 18:33:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>beer</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>drinking</category>
		<category>MaxRudin</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10276/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www2.bostonherald.com/news/local_regional/ausprez09142001.htm"&gt;Meehan, Neal raise doubts on leadership of president&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;i&gt; ``I don&apos;t buy the notion Air Force One was a target,&apos;&apos; said Meehan. ``That&apos;s just PR. That&apos;s just spin.&apos;&apos;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meehan office number... (202) 225-3411  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10276</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:07:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airforceone</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>meehan</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>revbrian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


