<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with democrats and Constitution</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/democrats+Constitution</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'democrats' and 'Constitution' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:22:26 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:22:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Censuring Domestic Surveillance</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49992/Censuring%2DDomestic%2DSurveillance</link>
		<description> &quot;Resolved that the United States Senate does hereby censure George W. Bush, president of the United States, and does condemn his unlawful authorization of wiretaps of Americans.&quot;  Invoking &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/03/12.html#a7493&quot;&gt;&quot;high crimes and misdemeanors,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Wisconsin Senator Russ Feingold introduces a &lt;a href=&quot;http://feingold.senate.gov/censureresolution.pdf&quot;&gt;motion to censure&lt;/a&gt; [PDF link] President Bush for his controversial, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_controversy&quot;&gt;legally dubious&lt;/a&gt; NSA wiretapping program. Feingold declares: &lt;a href=&quot;http://feingold.senate.gov/~feingold/releases/06/03/20060312.html&quot;&gt;&quot;The President must be held accountable for authorizing a program that clearly violates the law.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Republican leader Frist retorts: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nysun.com/article/28983&quot;&gt;&quot;It&apos;s a crazy political move&quot;&lt;/a&gt; that sends a &lt;a href=&quot;http://rawstory.com/news/2006/Full_transcript_Feingold_announces_he_will_0312.html&quot;&gt;&quot;terrible&quot; signal to Iran&lt;/a&gt;.  Democratic bloggers say: &lt;a href=&quot;http://contactcongress.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Call your senator&lt;/a&gt;. [More legal fallout from the NSA program recently discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/49942&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49992</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:22:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>censure</category>
		<category>civilliberties</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>Feingold</category>
		<category>FourthAmendment</category>
		<category>Frist</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Tell &apos;em Uncle Alberto Says It&apos;s Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49848/Tell%2Dem%2DUncle%2DAlberto%2DSays%2DIts%2DCool</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/03/08/gop_senators_refuse_eavesdropping_inquiry/"&gt;&apos;The committee is, to put it bluntly, basically under the control of the White House,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; said Jay Rockefeller, vice-president of the Senate Intelligence Committee, after the committee quashed a broad inquiry into the legality of the NSA spying on Americans -- despite an increasing number of legal scholars &lt;a href=&quot;http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/03/nsa-eavesdropping-and-fourth-amendment.php&quot;&gt;coming forward&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.constitutionproject.org/article.cfm?messageID=145&quot;&gt;declaring&lt;/a&gt; that the program is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2006_hr/022806koh.html&quot;&gt;&quot;blatantly illegal,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; in the words of Yale Law School dean Harold Koh. Meanwhile, the GOP proposes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/07/eavesdropping/&quot;&gt;giving spying on Americans the &quot;force of law&quot;&lt;/a&gt; while subjecting it to &quot;rigorous oversight.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49848</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:51:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>checksandbalances</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>FourthAmendment</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>SenateSelectCommitteeonIntelligence</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Angry and Furious at the Collaborationist Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48128/Angry%2Dand%2DFurious%2Dat%2Dthe%2DCollaborationist%2DDemocrats</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/martin-garbus/angry-and-furious-at-the-_b_13478.html"&gt;Angry and Furious at the Collaborationist Democrats&lt;/a&gt; I [Martin Garbus] don&apos;t understand. An hour after I saw the Times &quot;scoop&quot; on the Bush illegal wiretapping plan, I wrote that it was clearly illegal and unconstitutional.

But as it now turns out, dozens of politicians, as well as the New York Times knew about the surveillance plan and did nothing.

Representative Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leader in the House, and Senator Jay Rockefeller, the Democratic senator from West Virginia, a man known for some sensitivity to civil liberties infringements, and a substantial number of congressmen, plus the New York Times, all knew of Bush&apos;s illegal spying.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48128</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:05:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>democrat</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>garbus</category>
		<category>illegalsurveillance</category>
		<category>op-ed</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Party like it&apos;s 1892</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38391/Party%2Dlike%2Dits%2D1892</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://history.smsu.edu/wrmiller/Populism/texts/farmers_and_third_party_politics.htm"&gt;Party like it&apos;s 1892!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;Executive power and patronage have been used to corrupt our legislatures and defeat the will of the people, and plutocracy has thereby been enthroned upon the ruins of democracy.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/29.htm&quot;&gt;*&lt;/a&gt;  In the late 1800s, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Populist_Party&quot;&gt;Populist Party&lt;/a&gt;, or People&apos;s Party, formed to merge the Farmers Alliance message of economic empowerment for growers with the Knights of Labor&apos;s movement to check the growing power and corrupt practices of big business &lt;small&gt;(along with the Greenbacks Party critiques of monetary policy)&lt;/small&gt;.  With a strong base in the midwest and south, the party earned 9% of the 1892 popular vote, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:ElectoralCollege1892-Large.png&quot;&gt;won the presidential electoral votes of four states&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(not to mention electing 10 congressmen, 5 senators, 3 governors, and 1,500 state legislators)&lt;/small&gt;. However the party&apos;s power quickly faded as the Democratic Party co-opted much of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5361/&quot;&gt;Populist platform&lt;/a&gt; while  &lt;a href=&quot;http://projects.vassar.edu/1896/populists.html&quot;&gt;internal disputes&lt;/a&gt; culminated in the Populists placing the Dems&apos; 1896 nominee at the head of their own ticket.  Nevertheless, the populist movement&apos;s influence continued to be felt through various 20th century reforms including &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.historicaldocuments.com/17thAmendment.htm&quot;&gt;direct election of senators&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution&quot;&gt;presidential term limits&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitextlo/ess_nixongold.html&quot;&gt;abandonment of the gold standard&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38391</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:14:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>1892</category>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>DemocraticParty</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>farmers</category>
		<category>GildedAge</category>
		<category>GreenbacksParty</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>KnightsOfLabor</category>
		<category>labor</category>
		<category>Party</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>populism</category>
		<category>Populist</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<dc:creator>nakedcodemonkey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


