<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with disagreement</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/disagreement</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'disagreement' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:18:29 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:18:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Turning writing into a conversation</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70350/Turning%2Dwriting%2Dinto%2Da%2Dconversation</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html&quot;&gt;How To Disagree&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70350</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:18:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>disagreement</category>
		<category>forums</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>chuckdarwin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>DontvoteRalph.net</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33910/DontvoteRalphnet</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dontvoteralph.net/start.htm#"&gt;DontvoteRalph.net&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Look at just a few of those who supported Nader in 2000, but see that this year is crucially different: Noam Chomsky, Ben Cohen, Peter Coyote, Phil Donahue, Ronnie Dugger, Jim Hightower, Robert McChesney, Michael Moore, and Bonnie Raitt. In fact, can you think of a prominent supporter from 2000 who supports him in 2004? Are we all members of Nader&#8217;s &#8220;liberal inteligentsia&#8221;? Or is the Bush presidency simply such a disaster that we realize there is only one responsible action for real progressives? Despite Mr. Nader&#8217;s inevitable disagreement, we don&#8217;t think everyone is out of step but Ralph.&quot; | So who is supporting Nader? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/6/23/191738/167&quot;&gt;Some think its the GOP.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33910</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 23:17:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>candidates</category>
		<category>disagreement</category>
		<category>gop</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>presidentialelection</category>
		<category>progressives</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<category>supporters</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9477/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.philosophers.co.uk/current/scanlon_interviewed.htm"&gt;There is something further to be said on the issue of disagreement. &lt;/a&gt; If two people find that there are arguments on both sides that are both very compelling, maybe that renders the answer to the question what is right and wrong indeterminate. Maybe there isn&#8217;t a clear answer.  [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scitechdaily.com/&quot;&gt;SciTech Daily&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9477</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2001 11:28:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>argument</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>disagreement</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


