<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with discrimination and rights</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/discrimination+rights</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'discrimination' and 'rights' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:50:48 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:50:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>There are known unknowns</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85851/There%2Dare%2Dknown%2Dunknowns</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33319490/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/"&gt;&quot;My answer is, I don&apos;t know. I don&apos;t know.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; US District Court Judge &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaughn_R._Walker&quot;&gt;Vaughn Walker&lt;/a&gt; asked Prop 8 supporters to define the nature and extent of damage done by same-sex couples to the institution of marriage, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://lawdork.net/2009/10/14/prop-8-challenge-to-continue-to-trial/&quot;&gt;being unable to get any definitive answer&lt;/a&gt;, denied the request from supporters of Prop 8 to throw out &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_v._Schwarzenegger&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Perry v. Schwarzenegger&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and ordered the case to trial in January 2010.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85851</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:50:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bigotry</category>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>glbt</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>prop8</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<dc:creator>Blazecock Pileon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Separate and Expensive</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85559/Separate%2Dand%2DExpensive</link>
		<description> Being a same-sex, taxpaying couple &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/03/your-money/03money.html?_r=1&amp;hp&quot;&gt;is more expensive, overall, than being a straight, taxpaying couple&lt;/a&gt;, for the same services and benefits, when available.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85559</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:21:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bigotry</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>glbt</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<dc:creator>Blazecock Pileon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>workplace protection--not as hotbutton as Marriage Equality or Don&apos;t Ask Don&apos;t Tell, but far more essential</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64420/workplace%2Dprotectionnot%2Das%2Dhotbutton%2Das%2DMarriage%2DEquality%2Dor%2DDont%2DAsk%2DDont%2DTell%2Dbut%2Dfar%2Dmore%2Dessential</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.hrcbackstory.org/2007/09/witness-list-fo.html"&gt;ENDA House hearings start tomorrow&lt;/a&gt; --a record &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.equalityforum.com/press-20070829.cfm&quot;&gt;94% of Fortune 500 companies&lt;/a&gt; now provide Sexual Orientation Discrimination Protection, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=27694&quot;&gt;89% of Americans&lt;/a&gt; polled believe &lt;i&gt;Homosexuals should have equal rights in terms of job opportunities&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hrc.org/issues/workplace/5636.htm&quot;&gt;Repeatedly introduced and then killed since 1994,&lt;/a&gt; the 2007 version--&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-2015&quot;&gt;H.R. 2015--Employment Non-Discrimination Act&lt;/a&gt; (text of bill)--includes transgender protection for the very first time. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.traditionalvalues.org/modules.php?sid=3128&quot;&gt; The TVC is just one of many organizations fighting it. &lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(there is a religious exemption, but groups like the TVC would be covered by it)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64420</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:17:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>ENDA</category>
		<category>equality</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>GLBT</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lesbian</category>
		<category>protections</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>society</category>
		<category>workplace</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>persecution complex? prosecution complex?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58903/persecution%2Dcomplex%2Dprosecution%2Dcomplex</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.firstfreedom.gov/"&gt;The First Freedom Project&lt;/a&gt; --new from the Dept of Justice, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talk2action.org/story/2007/2/22/104711/204&quot;&gt;announced at the Southern Baptist Convention&lt;/a&gt; along with a call for their help---specifically and only to protect the religious from discrimination against them. Many are not impressed: &lt;i&gt;The administration has often ignored the importance of the no establishment principle by supporting attempts of governments to endorse a religious message, using tax dollars to fund pervasively religious organizations, allowing religious discrimination in hiring for federally funded projects, ...&lt;/i&gt; Legal strategies and actions from groups like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/news/story.aspx?cid=4019&quot;&gt;Alliance Defense Fund&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclj.org/&quot;&gt;ACLJ&lt;/a&gt; are now official DOJ policy, it appears. &lt;i&gt;...In his statement, Gonzales mentioned several cases litigated by ADF and its allies ...&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58903</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:13:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>churchstate</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>faith</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;She&apos;s done a lot of good.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49337/Shes%2Ddone%2Da%2Dlot%2Dof%2Dgood</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/20/obituaries/20partner.html"&gt;Laurel Hester, RIP&lt;/a&gt; --because she and her partner fought, New Jersey police and fire department employees can now name anyone--not just a spouse--as a beneficiary for pension rights, helping to protect those they love after they&apos;re gone. Just one person who made a difference.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49337</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:12:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>equality</category>
		<category>fight</category>
		<category>firemen</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lesbian</category>
		<category>NewJersey</category>
		<category>partners</category>
		<category>pensions</category>
		<category>police</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>spouses</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Taking the Long View</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36742/Taking%2Dthe%2DLong%2DView</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/loving.html"&gt;Only in 1967 did &lt;i&gt;Loving v. Virginia&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; overturn vigorously-enforced laws against interracial marriage in these 15 states--Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia.  Only in 1964 did the &lt;a href=&quot;http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/laws/majorlaw/civilr19.htm&quot;&gt;Civil Rights Act&lt;/a&gt; overturn laws against equal access to voting, public accommodation, and public education.  Only in 1963 did the &lt;a href=&quot;http://nc.essortment.com/equalpayact_rvwx.htm&quot;&gt;Equal Pay Act&lt;/a&gt; mandate that men and women be paid the same wage for the same work at the same job.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/History/TheCentury_NationsView.html&quot;&gt;History&lt;/a&gt;  isn&apos;t a superhighway, leading us in straight lines toward utopia.  We &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bartleby.com/65/mc/McCarthyJR.html&quot;&gt;fall back&lt;/a&gt; and we &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.liu.edu/cwis/cwp/library/mlking.htm&quot;&gt;move forward&lt;/a&gt;, but over the past fifty years, the United States has become considerably more inclusive and equality of access to opportunity has widened.  Take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://balrog.sdsu.edu/~putman/536/mixedschools.htm&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; from the &lt;i&gt;Atlantic Monthly&lt;/i&gt; in 1956--1956!--if you don&apos;t believe me.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36742</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 11:42:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>court</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>equality</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>interracial</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>loving</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>prejudice</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>racism</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>scotus</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>virginia</category>
		<dc:creator>Sidhedevil</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>speaking of Hunting Season...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31848/speaking%2Dof%2DHunting%2DSeason</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.365gay.com/newscon04/03/031704fedWorkers.htm"&gt;Every gay and lesbian federal employee has just lost their protection from discrimination.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Gay and lesbians in the entire federal workforce have had their job protections officially removed by the office of Special Counsel. The new Special Counsel, Scott Bloch, says his interpretation of a 1978 law intended to protect employees and job applicants from adverse personnel actions is that gay and lesbian workers are not covered.
Bloch said that the while a gay employee would have no recourse for being fired or demoted for being gay, that same worker could not be fired for attending a gay Pride event.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31848</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:25:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lesbian</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<category>workplace</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


