<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with dns and domains</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/dns+domains</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'dns' and 'domains' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2002 12:03:37 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2002 12:03:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19617/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/preliminary-evaluation-report-19aug02.htm"&gt;ICANN disses&lt;/a&gt; the  &lt;a href=&quot;http://not.invisible.net/dot/&quot;&gt;the dot&lt;/a&gt;.  The guy who runs the &lt;a href=&quot;http://not.invisible.net/&quot;&gt;Internet Multicasting Service&lt;/a&gt; teamed up with the guy who runs the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isc.org/&quot;&gt;Internet Software Consortium&lt;/a&gt; and submitted a proposal to mange the .ORG registry.  ICANN&apos;s conslutants [sic] &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/gartner-evaluation-report-19aug02.pdf&quot;&gt;dumped on the proposal&lt;/a&gt; (300KB PDF) claiming it is among the worst proposals &lt;i&gt;from a technical standpoint&lt;/i&gt;.  Mind you, ISC produces the software that runs the DNS and actually operates root and top-level servers. And ICANN thinks they lack the technical mojo?  Wow! Are we all ready to admit that ICANN is completely corrupt and beyond saving? More info &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icannwatch.org/article.php?sid=927&amp;mode=thread&amp;order=0&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/&quot;&gt;IP&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19617</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2002 12:03:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dns</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>dotcoms</category>
		<category>icann</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>urls</category>
		<dc:creator>chipr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18077/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verisign.com/&quot;&gt;Verisign&lt;/a&gt; (aka &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verisignoff.org/&quot;&gt;Satan&lt;/a&gt;) is set to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/15/technology/15NET.html&quot;&gt;relinquish the management of the .org domain&lt;/a&gt; pool this week, after agreeing to drop both the .org and .net registries to keep the .com one until 2007. &lt;a href=&quot;http://videolab.uoregon.edu/events/ICANN/icann_bucharest.html&quot;&gt;ICANN is meeting on it this week &lt;/a&gt; (webcast). The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/applications/&quot;&gt;list of all interested parties with competing applications is here&lt;/a&gt;, but personally I&apos;m pulling for Carl from &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.org/&quot;&gt;media.org&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s proposal for &lt;a href=&quot;http://not.invisible.net/MT/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=55&quot;&gt;a public trust&lt;/a&gt;. For anyone that owns a .org domain, this is one to watch.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18077</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2002 16:06:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>.org</category>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>topleveldomains</category>
		<category>verisign</category>
		<category>www</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17745/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.textism.com/article/526/"&gt;The hoopla gets deeper.&lt;/a&gt; Upon learning that &quot;Sarah Hubert&quot; was a non-person, registrar &lt;a href=&quot;http://AITDomains.com&quot;&gt;AITDomains&lt;/a&gt; simply canceled the registration to hoopla.com, releasing it into the wild, where it was picked up by someone from Taiwan.  They gave no notice to Leslie or anyone else that I can tell, so that she had no opportunity to grab the name back for herself.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17745</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2002 11:30:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AIT</category>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>hoopla</category>
		<category>Leslie</category>
		<category>registrar</category>
		<dc:creator>mikewas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13536/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://ml.register.com"&gt;Register International Domain Names&lt;/a&gt; such as &quot;http://www.n&#xeb;rd.com&quot;, which is actually available.  (Note the umlaut on the e.)  If you&apos;ve been looking for an interesting domain name, only to find that they&apos;ve all been registered, this may be just the ticket.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13536</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2002 08:10:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>internationaldomains</category>
		<category>register</category>
		<dc:creator>fnirt</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9426/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.domainnotes.com/news/article/0,,5281_597121_1,00.html"&gt;An inventive way to get cybersquatter off your domain.&lt;/a&gt; [page 3 &amp; 4] Anyone have any great domain theft/squatting  stories? My office just won a domain battle, and was served papers for another soon after.  Life Goes on...[&lt;font size=&quot;1&quot;&gt;also tidbits on the motivations of congress in passing domain-use laws.&lt;/font&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9426</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2001 15:54:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cyberlaw</category>
		<category>cybersquatting</category>
		<category>dns</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>domainuselaws</category>
		<category>www</category>
		<dc:creator>th3ph17</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6232/</link>
		<description> Following the &lt;a target=&quot;_new&quot; href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/6212&quot;&gt;earlier&lt;/a&gt; post regarding cheap domain names, does anyone know anything about .eu.com domains? I&apos;ve found &lt;a target=&quot;_new&quot; href=&quot;http://www.domainbuster.com/&quot;&gt;one site&lt;/a&gt; offering them, but are they actually available yet? What&apos;s the story?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6232</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2001 14:13:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>Cobbler</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6196/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.new.net/"&gt;New.net lauched today,&lt;/a&gt; with their attempt to create their own TLD registrar that seems like a bastardization of DNS. Most people will need to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.new.net/help_faq.tp#tc-3&quot;&gt;download a plugin&lt;/a&gt;, is there any chance this could be successful? Is ICANN doing anything to stop them or will they just die on their own?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6196</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2001 11:01:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>DomainNames</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>new.net</category>
		<category>registrar</category>
		<category>TLD</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5471/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,41387,00.html&quot;&gt;Microsoft properties down again&lt;/a&gt;. This time due to DNS routing. How embarrassing for them.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5471</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dns</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>urls</category>
		<category>windows</category>
		<dc:creator>quirked</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4351/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href= &quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=ult+search+inc&amp;num=20&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;safe=off&amp;btnG=Google+Search&quot; title= &quot;Google search for Ult Search Inc&quot;&gt;Who are these guys?&lt;/a&gt; And why have they registered a thousand or more domains, only to have them all point at the same generic portal? I bumped into them three times today while doing searches for &lt;a href= &quot;http://www.dynhtml.com&quot; title= &quot;http://www.dynhtml.com&quot;&gt;DHTML&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href= &quot;http://wwwvoice.com/bud/bud.html&quot; title= &quot;http://wwwvoice.com/bud/bud.html&quot;&gt;Budd Uggly&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href= &quot;http://www.worldboxing.com/&quot; title= &quot;http://www.worldboxing.com/&quot;&gt;boxing&lt;/a&gt;. No banners, no logo, no company info, and search results are a framed page from goto.com. Strange.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4351</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2000 14:08:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dns</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>goto</category>
		<category>urls</category>
		<category>whois</category>
		<dc:creator>nikzhowz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3736/</link>
		<description> All of this talk about madonna.com and string.com seems to me to be just a mad scramble to grab a &apos;scarce&apos; resource (ie. the .com TLD). The only problem is that the scarcity is completely artificial. 
Networking expert and lawyer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cavebear.com&quot;&gt;Karl Auerbach&lt;/a&gt; has just been elected to ICANN as the US at-large rep on a platform of reducing ICANN&apos;s role from it current one as a overreaching international law making body.

He says that the DNS system is capable of handling far more than just a few top-level domains like .com, .org, .net, .uk, .au etc. He says it could handle &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cavebear.com/ialc/platform.htm#dnsp-stability&quot;&gt;millions&lt;/a&gt;. 
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3736</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:06:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dns</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>icann</category>
		<category>urls</category>
		<dc:creator>lagado</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3505/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.digitaldivas.com/gol/"&gt;Divas Defeat Goliath!&lt;/a&gt; The Digital Divas have been successful in their effort to get &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitaldiva.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Microsoft&lt;/a&gt; to cease and desist use of the Digital Diva name.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3505</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2000 20:49:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>bullying</category>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>digitaldivas</category>
		<category>divas</category>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>domainnames</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<dc:creator>netbros</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/679/</link>
		<description> Today I was once again reminded why I hate &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unclaimeddomains.com/&quot;&gt;domain squatters&lt;/a&gt; so much. I wanted to find the website for &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.imdb.com/Title?0134084&quot;&gt;Scream 3&lt;/a&gt;, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scream3.com/&quot;&gt;scream3.com&lt;/a&gt; is some half-assed hacked site. Every domain with &quot;scream3&quot; in it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.domainsurfer.com/ssearch.cgi?dom=scream3&quot;&gt;seems to be taken&lt;/a&gt; (some by Miramax), but none of them resolve to a movie site. The only one that looks halfway official is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scream3-film.com/&quot;&gt;in french&lt;/a&gt;. Here it is, opening weekend, and there doesn&apos;t seem to be an official site up that I can use.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.679</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2000 18:45:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>domainsquatters</category>
		<category>squatting</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


