<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with domains and canada</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/domains+canada</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'domains' and 'canada' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:04:37 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:04:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6961/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/18280.html"&gt;Too delicious for words: &lt;/a&gt;  A guy registers walmartcanadasucks.com. Wal-Mart sues. Guy wins. Guy sues Wal-Mart to get them to fork over all the walmartcanadasucks.x they registered defensively after he registered the .com. Cajones, mi amigo.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6961</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:04:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>urls</category>
		<category>wallmart</category>
		<dc:creator>NortonDC</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3480/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.annemclellan.com"&gt;Who owns your name?&lt;/a&gt; I could not find this story on the web. I saw it in print. It appeared in an article by Geoffrey Vanderburg in the Friday Sept. 29th Edmonton Journal.&lt;br&gt;
Here&apos;s an excerpt. &lt;i&gt;&quot;An internet company with links to the National Firearms Association has been ordered to give up a Web site using Justice Minister Anne McLellan&apos;s name. Smartcanuk Internet Services has been told to transfer control of annemclellan.com to Canada&apos;s justice minister, McLellan&apos;s Edmonton lawyer said Thursday&quot;&lt;br&gt;
Al Green, owner of Smartcanuk... says the ruling sets a &quot;very very dangerous precedent.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&quot;Sandra Sellers, an eResolution arbitrator...., decided Monday to grant transfer of annemclellan.com and annemclellan.org to McLellan.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
McLellan was able to demonstrate that the domain name was identical or similar to a trade-mark, that Green had no legitimate interests in the name, and that the name was being used in bad faith....&lt;br&gt;
Green argues McLellan is not a trademark, she&apos;s not famous and his use of the Web site does not constitute &quot;bad faith&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
I think I have to agree with the arbitrator on this one. If there is one last sacred domain we should be entitled to it is our own names. Although in the case of the John Smiths of the world that position is likely to take some heat. Any thoughts people?

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3480</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2000 18:40:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alberta</category>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>domainnaming</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>edmonton</category>
		<category>edmontonjournal</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<dc:creator>daddyray</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3125/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cira.ca/"&gt;.ca for us normal folk&lt;/a&gt; Many of the old, tight-assed restrictions on the .ca domain are being lifted this fall. The change might be annoying to some existing .ca owners, but a blessing for us regular Joe canadians that wanted to be .ca&apos;ed, instead of .com&apos;ed. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.internic.ca/&quot;&gt;Internic.ca&lt;/a&gt; is taking prebookings now.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3125</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2000 22:21:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>cira</category>
		<category>domain</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>NIC</category>
		<category>registrar</category>
		<dc:creator>mkn</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1823/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cdnnet.ca"&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;.ca&lt;/code&gt; slightly less tightarsed&lt;/a&gt; En tout cas, the Canadian domain administration has &quot;streamlined&quot; its application process (like an NSI manqu&#xe9;), but hasn&apos;t improved its Victorian-era rules (one domain per entity, hard to get a .ca, etc.). &lt;EM&gt;But&lt;/em&gt; searches now only show if a domain is or isn&apos;t available, not who owns it. Ewww.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1823</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2000 17:25:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>.ca</category>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>urls</category>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


