<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with domains and registrar</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/domains+registrar</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'domains' and 'registrar' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:29:59 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:29:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>RegisterFly, er RegFly at it again</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69309/RegisterFly%2Der%2DRegFly%2Dat%2Dit%2Dagain</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.registerflies.com/registerfly-news/the-registerfly-debacle-continues.html?Itemid=1"&gt;ICANN accreditation yanked, RegisterFly rebrands and tries again.&lt;/a&gt; Though partner &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.namepros.com/industry-news/429171-registerfly-rebranded-regfly-icann-notice-removed.html&quot;&gt;Robert O&apos;Niell claims otherwise,&lt;/a&gt; it looks like former CEO &lt;a href=&quot;http://icannwiki.org/Kevin_Medina&quot;&gt;Kevin Medina&lt;/a&gt; is still in the picture. 

Without accreditation and their former registrar partner, eNom, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RegisterFly&quot;&gt;Reg&lt;strike&gt;ister&lt;/strike&gt;Fly&lt;/a&gt;, uh I mean &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.regfly.com&quot;&gt;RegFly&lt;/a&gt; has partnered with leading wholesale registrar &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tucows.com&quot;&gt;Tucows&lt;/a&gt; to start selling domain names again. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.namepros.com/industry-news/434424-regfly-com-is-kevin-medina.html&quot;&gt;RegisterFlies.com comes out of retirement&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/58962/Domain-name-hell&quot;&gt;Previously&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69309</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:29:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domainname</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>fraud</category>
		<category>registrar</category>
		<category>yougottabekiddingme</category>
		<dc:creator>FlamingBore</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19680/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.icann.org/correspondence/touton-letter-to-beckwith-03sep02.htm"&gt;&quot;VeriSign got in trouble,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-03sep02.htm&quot;&gt;VeriSign got in trouble!&quot;&lt;/a&gt; ICANN serves VeriSign with a formal notice of breach of its accreditation agreement for its mishandling of WHOIS data under its control (.com addresses). VeriSign has 15 days to smarten up or it could lose the .com registry.  (&lt;i&gt;via &lt;a href=&quot;http://boingboing.net/2002_09_01_archive.html#85410597&quot;&gt;Boing Boing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19680</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2002 17:50:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>icann</category>
		<category>registrar</category>
		<category>verisign</category>
		<category>whois</category>
		<dc:creator>mcwetboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18495/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://perpetualbeta.com/woifm/archive/002297.html"&gt;Score one for the good guys.&lt;/a&gt;  Smug.com has been returned to its &lt;a href=http://betterwhois.com/bwhois.cgi?domain=smug.com&gt;rightful owner&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18495</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2002 07:37:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>registrar</category>
		<category>smug.com</category>
		<category>whois</category>
		<dc:creator>ratbastard</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17745/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.textism.com/article/526/"&gt;The hoopla gets deeper.&lt;/a&gt; Upon learning that &quot;Sarah Hubert&quot; was a non-person, registrar &lt;a href=&quot;http://AITDomains.com&quot;&gt;AITDomains&lt;/a&gt; simply canceled the registration to hoopla.com, releasing it into the wild, where it was picked up by someone from Taiwan.  They gave no notice to Leslie or anyone else that I can tell, so that she had no opportunity to grab the name back for herself.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17745</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2002 11:30:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AIT</category>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>hoopla</category>
		<category>Leslie</category>
		<category>registrar</category>
		<dc:creator>mikewas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17487/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/05/30/0526203"&gt;MacSlash is the latest victim of domain hijacking.&lt;/a&gt; Depending on how the DNS fairies have propagated themselves, you may be able to read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macslash.com/articles/02/05/29/2050202.shtml&quot;&gt;MacSlash&apos;s own thread on the situation&lt;/a&gt;, or you may be taken to a generic &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dotster.com/&quot;&gt;Dotster&lt;/a&gt; page. I got Dotster at work yesterday but I&apos;m still getting MacSlash at home. Not yet clear how this will turn out.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17487</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2002 04:53:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>registrar</category>
		<dc:creator>mcwetboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16299/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.textism.com/article/494/"&gt;Hoopla.com Stolen, Net Sol says, &quot;Oops! Not Our Problem!&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Leslie Harpold&apos;s Hoopla.com was stolen from her through a series of dodgy faxes (or something...) and now, Network Solutions is throwing up their hands and telling her they can&apos;t do anything.  If this doesn&apos;t beg for Metafilter community action, I don&apos;t know what does.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16299</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:09:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domain</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>hoopla</category>
		<category>NetworkSolutions</category>
		<category>NIC</category>
		<category>registrar</category>
		<category>registry</category>
		<category>textism</category>
		<dc:creator>benbrown</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6196/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.new.net/"&gt;New.net lauched today,&lt;/a&gt; with their attempt to create their own TLD registrar that seems like a bastardization of DNS. Most people will need to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.new.net/help_faq.tp#tc-3&quot;&gt;download a plugin&lt;/a&gt;, is there any chance this could be successful? Is ICANN doing anything to stop them or will they just die on their own?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6196</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2001 11:01:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>DomainNames</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>new.net</category>
		<category>registrar</category>
		<category>TLD</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3125/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cira.ca/"&gt;.ca for us normal folk&lt;/a&gt; Many of the old, tight-assed restrictions on the .ca domain are being lifted this fall. The change might be annoying to some existing .ca owners, but a blessing for us regular Joe canadians that wanted to be .ca&apos;ed, instead of .com&apos;ed. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.internic.ca/&quot;&gt;Internic.ca&lt;/a&gt; is taking prebookings now.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3125</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2000 22:21:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>cira</category>
		<category>domain</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>NIC</category>
		<category>registrar</category>
		<dc:creator>mkn</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1664/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.news.com/Perspectives/Column/0,176,428,00.html?st.ne.per.idx.colp"&gt;interNIC lost my business!!!&lt;/a&gt; To take the heat (and any possible lawsuits) off of them, they have now changed thier policy to revoke anyone&apos;s domain name at their discretion.
 &lt;P&gt;Phil Sbarbaro, NSI&apos;s legal counsel, offered a parallel to summarize prevailing law: &quot;You don&apos;t own a domain name any more than you own your phone number.&quot; 
 &lt;P&gt;I don&apos;t know about you guys, but I am definitely finding another registrar to transfer my domain names to...ASAP!

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1664</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2000 21:25:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CNet</category>
		<category>domainnames</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>interNIC</category>
		<category>NSI</category>
		<category>registrar</category>
		<dc:creator>EricBrooksDotCom</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


