<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with domains and technology</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/domains+technology</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'domains' and 'technology' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:18:27 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:18:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Verisign and ICANN</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49358/Verisign%2Dand%2DICANN</link>
		<description> Bob Parsons of Go Daddy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bobparsons.com/dotcomscam.html&quot;&gt;warns &lt;/a&gt;about the proposed contract between VeriSign and ICANN, allowing VeriSign a permanent monopoly on .COM and price increases without regulation.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49358</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:18:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>.com</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>GoDaddy</category>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>VeriSign</category>
		<dc:creator>Protocols of the Elders of Awesome</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19617/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/preliminary-evaluation-report-19aug02.htm"&gt;ICANN disses&lt;/a&gt; the  &lt;a href=&quot;http://not.invisible.net/dot/&quot;&gt;the dot&lt;/a&gt;.  The guy who runs the &lt;a href=&quot;http://not.invisible.net/&quot;&gt;Internet Multicasting Service&lt;/a&gt; teamed up with the guy who runs the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isc.org/&quot;&gt;Internet Software Consortium&lt;/a&gt; and submitted a proposal to mange the .ORG registry.  ICANN&apos;s conslutants [sic] &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/gartner-evaluation-report-19aug02.pdf&quot;&gt;dumped on the proposal&lt;/a&gt; (300KB PDF) claiming it is among the worst proposals &lt;i&gt;from a technical standpoint&lt;/i&gt;.  Mind you, ISC produces the software that runs the DNS and actually operates root and top-level servers. And ICANN thinks they lack the technical mojo?  Wow! Are we all ready to admit that ICANN is completely corrupt and beyond saving? More info &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icannwatch.org/article.php?sid=927&amp;mode=thread&amp;order=0&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/&quot;&gt;IP&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19617</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2002 12:03:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dns</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>dotcoms</category>
		<category>icann</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>urls</category>
		<dc:creator>chipr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5471/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,41387,00.html&quot;&gt;Microsoft properties down again&lt;/a&gt;. This time due to DNS routing. How embarrassing for them.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5471</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dns</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>urls</category>
		<category>windows</category>
		<dc:creator>quirked</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2608/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/artslife/weekendpost/story.html?f=/stories/20000722/350466.html"&gt;Dex and Courtney&apos;s wedding is off ...&lt;/a&gt; and you can find out why by watching &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jennicam.org&quot;&gt;JenniCam&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;Jennifer Ringley ... is in the eye of a virtual storm as a result of her relationship with Dex, ex of Dex and Courtney, whose &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latitude11.com/marry/&quot;&gt;wedding invitation&lt;/a&gt; promised a &apos;spiritual love fest&apos; of &apos;two souls uniting in harmony&apos; (it was still on Courtney&apos;s Web site -- www.latitude11.com -- even as Jenni&apos;s cam showed her and Dex having sex in her bedroom).&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2608</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2000 13:08:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cheating</category>
		<category>dex</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>jennicam</category>
		<category>jenniferringley</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>wedding</category>
		<dc:creator>rcade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


