<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with donaldrumsfeld and iraq</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/donaldrumsfeld+iraq</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'donaldrumsfeld' and 'iraq' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 09:13:44 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 09:13:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Onward Christian Soldiers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81733/Onward%2DChristian%2DSoldiers</link>
		<description> &quot;In the days surrounding the invasion of Iraq, &lt;a href=&quot;http://men.style.com/gq/features/topsecret&quot;&gt;cover sheets&lt;/a&gt;...began adorning top-secret intelligence briefings produced by [former defense secretary] Donald Rumsfeld&apos;s Pentagon. The sheets juxtaposed war images with inspirational Bible quotes and were delivered by Rumsfeld himself to the White House, where they were read by the man who, after September 11, referred to America&apos;s war on terror as a &apos;crusade.&apos;&quot; &quot;...Rumsfeld has always answered his detractors by claiming that history will one day judge him kindly. But as he waits for that day, a new group of critics&#8212;his administration peers&#8212;are suddenly speaking out for the first time. &lt;a href=&quot;http://men.style.com/gq/features/landing?id=content_9217&quot;&gt;What they&#8217;re saying? It isn&#8217;t pretty&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81733</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 09:13:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Crusade</category>
		<category>DefenseSecretary</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>Pentagon</category>
		<dc:creator>ericb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Who do the troops support?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56065/Who%2Ddo%2Dthe%2Dtroops%2Dsupport</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/110406Z.shtml"&gt;US Military Papers open fire on Rummy.&lt;/a&gt; Tomorrow, the Army Times -- and all other Military Times papers, including Navy and Air Force Times -- will run an editorial calling for Donald Rumsfeld to tender his resignation or be fired, due to his gross incompetence in handling the Iraq quagmire.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56065</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 14:01:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>lazaruslong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Signature Stamping Machine</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38040/Signature%2DStamping%2DMachine</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1377351,00.html"&gt;The automated signature machine would like to express it&apos;s sincerest condolences&lt;/a&gt; ...&quot;Rather than personally signing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theoaklandpress.com/stories/122104/opi_20041221004.shtml&quot;&gt;letters of condolence&lt;/a&gt; to the families of service members killed in action, Rumsfeld has been letting office workers affix his signature with a stamping machine.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.38040</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 13:37:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>autopen</category>
		<category>condolences</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>rumsfield</category>
		<dc:creator>thisisdrew</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>An Executive Order Along Torture&apos;s Path</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38012/An%2DExecutive%2DOrder%2DAlong%2DTortures%2DPath</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf&quot; title=&quot;&apos;&apos;I have been told that all interrogation techniques previously authorized by the Executive Order are still on the table but that certain techniques can only be used if very high-level authority is granted.&apos;&apos;&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Request for guidance regarding the OGC&apos;s EC regarding detainee abuse, referring to &#8220;interrogation techniques made lawful&#8221; by the &#8220;President&apos;s Executive Order.&#8221;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt; comes  from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/&quot;&gt;Records Released in Response to Torture FOIA Request&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/news/NewsPrint.cfm?ID=17216&amp;c=206&quot; title=&quot;The two-page e-mail that references an Executive Order states that the President directly authorized interrogation techniques including sleep deprivation, stress positions, the use of military dogs, and &apos;&apos;sensory deprivation through the use of hoods, etc.&apos;&apos; The ACLU is urging the White House to confirm or deny the existence of such an order and immediately to release the order if it exists. The FBI e-mail, which was sent in May 2004 from &apos;&apos;On Scene Commander--Baghdad&apos;&apos; to a handful of senior FBI officials, notes that the FBI has prohibited its agents from employing the techniques that the President is said to have authorized. &quot;&gt;Smoking Gun ?&lt;/a&gt; asks the ACLU--or just another stepping stone from &lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6733558/site/newsweek/print/1/displaymode/1098/&quot; title=&quot;In a Jan. 25, 2002, memo to Bush, Gonzales said the new war on terror &apos;&apos;renders obsolete Geneva&apos;s strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners.&apos;&apos; Some State Department lawyers charge that Gonzales misrepresented so many legal considerations and facts (including hard conclusions by State&apos;s Southeast Asia bureau about the nature of the Taliban) that one lawyer considers the memo to be &apos;&apos;an ethical breach.&apos;&apos; In response, a senior White House official says Gonzales&apos;s memo was only a &apos;&apos;draft&apos;&apos; and just one part of an extensive decision-making process in which all views were aired.&quot;&gt;Torture&apos;s Path&lt;/a&gt; ? As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/16/politics/16jag.html?ei=5090&amp;en=5016ee06544b6bc4&amp;ex=1260939600&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot; title=&quot;Several former high-ranking military lawyers say they are discussing ways to oppose President Bush&apos;s nomination of Alberto Gonzales to be attorney general, asserting that Gonzales&apos;s supervision of legal memorandums that appeared to sanction harsh treatment of detainees, even torture, showed unsound legal judgment.&quot;&gt;Ex-Military Lawyers Object to Bush Cabinet Nominee&lt;/a&gt;, and in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2004/12/17/memo/print.html&quot; title=&quot;Renewed exposure of prisoner abuse, torture and even murder by American military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan is widening already deep divisions between the Pentagon and the intelligence community -- and creating an untenable situation for Donald Rumsfeld, the beleaguered secretary of defense. A recently disclosed FBI memo indicates that &apos;&apos;marching orders&apos;&apos; to abandon traditional interrogation methods came from the defense secretary himself. In recent days, a coalition of human rights groups led by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights has brought new cases of abuse to public attention. Using the Freedom of Information Act, they have pried thousands of pages of previously secret documents from the Defense Department and other agencies.&quot;&gt;Torture begins at the top&lt;/a&gt;, Joe Conason suggests that a recently disclosed FBI memo indicates that &quot;marching orders&quot; to abandon traditional interrogation methods came from Defense Secretary Rumsfeld himself and all the while &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5083701-110481,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Fresh allegations about a regime of torture and humiliation inflicted on detainees by their American captors at Guant&amp;#0225;namo Bay have been made by a Briton still held there, according to Foreign Office documents seen by the Guardian. The claims by Martin Mubanga, from London, are the latest to surface from the prison where the US holds 550 Muslim men it claims are terrorists in conditions that have sparked worldwide condemnation. &quot;&gt;Guant&amp;#0225;namo torture and humiliation still going on, says shackled Briton&lt;/a&gt;. (more inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.38012</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:53:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>AlbertoGonzales</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>ExecutiveOrder</category>
		<category>FOIA</category>
		<category>FreedomOfInformationAct</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWOT</category>
		<category>Interrogation</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>Torture</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rumsfeld&apos;s War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36638/Rumsfelds%2DWar</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/pentagon/&quot;&gt;Frontline: Rumsfeld&apos;s War&lt;/a&gt;, a PBS/Washington Post joint documentary that aired earlier this week is now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/pentagon/view/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;. It is the inside story of Rumsfeld&apos;s battle to assert civil control over the military.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36638</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:12:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chainofcommand</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Frontline</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>PBS</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USMilitary</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rumsfeld doubts Saddam Laden link</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36029/Rumsfeld%2Ddoubts%2DSaddam%2DLaden%2Dlink</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3715396.stm"&gt;Rumsfeld doubts Saddam Laden link&lt;/a&gt; US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has cast doubt on whether there was ever a relationship between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36029</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 20:03:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alQaeda</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>SaddamHussein</category>
		<dc:creator>hoder</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Did I stutter?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31824/Did%2DI%2Dstutter</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/atf/cf/%7bE9245FE4-9A2B-43C7-A521-5D6FF2E06E03%7d/RUMSFELDDENY4.WMV"&gt;Rumsfeld waffles on &lt;i&gt;Face the Nation&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; when asked about the &quot;immediate threat&quot; argument in favor of war with Iraq. Link is Windows Media video.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

This to me is a gregarious example of how semantics and linguistic framing has been used to manipulate the American public, and one clear moment of this questionable tactic breaking down.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Interesting how he tries to blame it on the media and &quot;folklore&quot;, and then segues right into noncommittal doublespeak.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://joi.ito.com/&quot;&gt;Joi Ito&lt;/a&gt; (text available), via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanprogress.org/AccountTempFiles/cf/%7BE9245FE4-9A2B-43C7-A521-5D6FF2E06E03%7D/040315.HTM&quot;&gt;Center for American Progress.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31824</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:52:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>doublespeak</category>
		<category>ImmediateThreat</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>linguisticframing</category>
		<category>Rummy</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>loquacious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Saddam Hussein Sourcebook</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30383/Saddam%2DHussein%2DSourcebook</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB107/"&gt;Several newly declassified documents&lt;/a&gt; have been added to the National Security Archive&apos;s &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/special/iraq/index.htm&gt;Saddam Hussein Sourcebook&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, including a &lt;a href=http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB107/iraq07.pdf&gt;State Department cable to special envoy Donald Rumsfeld&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) for his second meeting with Saddam Hussein (months after the infamous &lt;a href=http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/index.htm&gt;handshake meeting&lt;/a&gt;,) in which Rumsfeld conveyed the Reagan administration&apos;s undiminished support for Hussein despite their public condemnation of his use of chemical weapons.  (It also mentions but seems unconcerned with Hussein&apos;s support for Abu Nidhal.)  Another document describes &lt;a href=http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB107/iraq11.pdf&gt;Bechtel&apos;s intention to do business with Iraq&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) through non-US sources in case of US sanctions.  [More analysis at &lt;a href=http://www.juancole.com/2003_12_01_juancole_archive.html#107190754281829381&gt;Juan Cole&lt;/a&gt;.]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30383</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:12:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>hussein</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>saddam</category>
		<category>saddamhussein</category>
		<category>sourcebook</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iraq Lacked Atom Whack</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29205/Iraq%2DLacked%2DAtom%2DWhack</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;At least four times in the fall of 2002, the president and his advisers invoked the specter of a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/07/bush.transcript/&quot; title=&quot;Bush: Don&apos;t wait for mushroom cloud&quot;&gt;mushroom cloud&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; and some of them, including Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, described &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A17707-2003Oct25?language=printer&quot; title=&quot;According to records made available to The Washington Post and interviews with arms investigators from the United States, Britain and Australia, it did not require a comprehensive survey to find the central assertions of the Bush administration&apos;s prewar nuclear case to be insubstantial or untrue. Although Hussein did not relinquish his nuclear ambitions or technical records, investigators said, it is now clear he had no active program to build a weapon, produce its key materials or obtain the technology he needed for either.&quot;&gt;Iraq&apos;s nuclear ambitions as a threat to the American homeland&lt;/a&gt;... Among the closely held internal judgments of the Iraq Survey Group, overseen by David Kay as special representative of CIA Director George J. Tenet, are that Iraq&apos;s nuclear weapons scientists did no significant arms-related work after 1991, that facilities with suspicious new construction proved benign, and that equipment of potential use to a nuclear program remained under seal or in civilian industrial use. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/em&gt;So in regards to Iraq&apos;s possession of &lt;em&gt;the one weapon we can be certain causes mass destruction: the atomic bomb&lt;/em&gt;, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.why-war.com/news/2002/10/07/weaponso.html&quot; title=&quot;Aum Shinrikyo employed skilled scientists and spent freely to make&apos;&apos;high grade&apos;&apos; anthrax, which it spread around Tokyo on several occasions. The cult gave up on anthrax after it failed to infect even a single person.&quot;&gt;Gregg&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newagepointofinfinity.com/homeland_security.htm&quot; title=&quot;The British and Germans used one ton of chemical weapons per fatality caused during World War I. The 1995 release of the nerve gas sarin in the Tokyo subways by the Aum Shinrikyo sect killed 12 people, fewer than a small, standard bomb might have killed in that crowded, enclosed area. An estimated 5,000 Kurds died in Saddam Hussein&apos;s chemical attack on Halabja, Iraq, in 1988, but this involved dozens of fighter-bombers making repeated low passes over the town. It&apos;s hard to imagine that terrorists could pull off such a coordinated heavy military maneuver. The image of millions cowering behind plastic sheets as clouds of biological weapons envelop a city owes more to science fiction than reality. The Japanese use of fleas infected with bubonic plague against Chinese cities in World War II was the only successful instance of bioattacks in contemporary warfare. In 1971, &apos;&apos;weaponized&apos;&apos; smallpox was accidentally released from a Soviet plant; three people died. In 1979, an explosion at another Soviet site released a large quantity of weapons-grade anthrax; 68 people died.In 1989, workers at an American government laboratory near Washington were accidentally exposed to Ebola, and it was several days before the mistake was discovered; no one died. A coordinated anthrax attack in the fall of 2001 killed five people, a tiny fraction of the number who died of influenza during the time the nation was terrified by the anthrax letters.&quot;&gt;Easterbrook&lt;/a&gt; put it, the verdict is the unsurprising (and unsurprisingly &lt;em&gt;closely held&lt;/em&gt;) nope, not, zero, zip, nada...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29205</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:43:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>DavidKay</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Easterbrook</category>
		<category>GeorgeTenet</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>IraqSurveyGroup</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>mushrooms</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>Tenet</category>
		<category>USMilitary</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Let&apos;s fire Rumsfeld!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28381/Lets%2Dfire%2DRumsfeld</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.moveon.org/firerumsfeld/"&gt;Let&apos;s fire Rumsfeld!&lt;/a&gt; Moveon wants him fired and so does &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truemajority.com/index.asp?action=10067&quot;&gt;Truemajority.&lt;/a&gt;  Considering the White House has been looking for a fall guy for Iraq for some time now, can the constituents help Bush decide?  I guess we can debate the effectiveness of petitions but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moveon.org/images/dorganlott-big.jpg&quot;&gt;photos like these are just impressive.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28381</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 01:15:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>MoveOn</category>
		<category>MoveOn.org</category>
		<category>petition</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>Truemajority</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rumsfeld made his own intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27006/Rumsfeld%2Dmade%2Dhis%2Down%2Dintelligence</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://salon.com/news/feature/2003/07/16/intelligence/index.html"&gt;Rumsfeld&apos;s personal spy ring&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;The defense secretary couldn&apos;t count on the CIA or the State Department to provide a pretext for war in Iraq. So he created a new agency that would tell him what he wanted to hear.&lt;/em&gt;  Today, &lt;strong&gt;Salon&lt;/strong&gt; also looks into the role played by &lt;a href=&quot;http://salon.com/news/feature/2003/07/16/bolton/index.html&quot;&gt;John Bolton&lt;/a&gt;.  Is investigative journalism now just relegated to the web? [you have to look at an ad, I believe]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27006</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:32:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cia</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>johnbolton</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>U.S. says Iraq may have junked toxic arms</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26027/US%2Dsays%2DIraq%2Dmay%2Dhave%2Djunked%2Dtoxic%2Darms</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.iht.com/cgi-bin/generic.cgi?template=articleprint.tmplh&amp;amp;ArticleId=97762"&gt;U.S. says Iraq may have junked toxic arms&lt;/a&gt; Thus spake Rummy in a speech. We know they have them. If we can not find them it is because they got rid of them. But that still means they had them at one time, right?
Question: what are those top scientists and Bath party members telling their captors wherever they are being held for questioning?  Or is too important to reveal too.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26027</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 09:29:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>weaponsofmassdestruction</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;General Rumsfeld&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24770/General%2DRumsfeld</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030407fa_fact1"&gt;&quot;General Rumsfeld&quot;&lt;/a&gt; &#8220;This is tragic,&#8221; one senior planner said bitterly. &#8220;American lives are being lost.&#8221; The former intelligence official told me, &#8220;They all said, &#8216;We can do it with air power.&#8217; They believed their own propaganda.&#8221;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24770</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 00:36:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bush to remake Middle East</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24499/Bush%2Dto%2Dremake%2DMiddle%2DEast</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/0,,SB10481991589095700,00.html"&gt;WSJ says war in Iraq really first step in grand scheme to remake the Middle East.&lt;/a&gt; Rumsfeld and Fleischer can still be seen on TV news implying &quot;&lt;a _top href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030121-7.html&quot;&gt;we just want them to disarm&quot;.&lt;/a&gt;  More on &lt;a _top href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/interviews/int2003-03-11.htm&quot;&gt;What Makes W. Tick&lt;/a&gt; from The Atlantic.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24499</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:07:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>fleischer</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>dand</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>US and Gassing Iraqis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24498/US%2Dand%2DGassing%2DIraqis</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sunshine-project.org/publications/pr/pr070203.html"&gt;Military use of Gas&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt; Top US military planners are preparing for the US to use incapacitating biochemical weapons in an invasion of Iraq. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Gen. Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, revealed the plans in February 5th testimony before the US House Armed Services Committee. This is the first official US acknowledgement that it may use (bio)chemical weapons in its crusade to rid other countries of such weapons.&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Would someone explain to me again why we&apos;re attacking Iraq?  Was it something about use and/or possession of chemical weapons?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24498</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 07:21:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biochemical</category>
		<category>chemical</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>gas</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rumsfeld met Saddam in late 80s</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22587/Rumsfeld%2Dmet%2DSaddam%2Din%2Dlate%2D80s</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,866942,00.html"&gt;Rumsfeld helped Saddam during war with Iran,&lt;/a&gt; while they had precise information about daily use of chemical weapons such as mustard gas, nerve gas, anthrax, and sarin. He met Saddam Hussein in Baghdad and passed on the US willingness to help his regime and restore full diplomatic relations, in order to help Iraq win the war. [source: Guardian]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22587</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2002 22:15:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>baghdad</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>rumsfled</category>
		<category>saddam</category>
		<category>saddamhussein</category>
		<dc:creator>hoder</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20215/</link>
		<description> TRANSCRIPTS: 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senate.gov/~armed_services/statemnt/2002/September/Rumsfeld.pdf&quot;&gt;A case on Iraq - Rumsfeld&apos;s testimony to Senate Armed Services Committee&lt;/a&gt;, 9.19.02.&lt;br&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html&quot;&gt;The National Security Strategy of the United States of America&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d021083t.pdf&quot;&gt;GAO e-Government Proposal&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://byrd.senate.gov/byrd_newsroom/byrd_news_sept2002/rls_sept2002/rls_sept2002_6.html&quot;&gt;Senator Byrd on the Department of Homeland Security&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
Today&apos;s bumper crop of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.journalismjobs.com/orville_schell.cfm&quot;&gt;limited audience&lt;/a&gt; government info links.
&quot;Maybe only 50,000 people want to know what&apos;s going on in Libya, but those 50,000 people are really important. You don&apos;t want to have more planes blow up. But maybe six million people want to watch Jerry Springer. Well, who owns the airwaves? Basically we do.&quot; &lt;b&gt;Do you think that unprocessed, source texts are getting filtered effectively to the public?&lt;/b&gt;

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20215</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2002 07:05:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>jerryspringer</category>
		<category>libya</category>
		<category>nationalsecurity</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>sheauga</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19728/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/04/september11/main520830.shtml"&gt;Plans For Iraq Attack Began On 9/11&lt;/a&gt; &quot;CBS News has learned that barely five hours after American Airlines Flight 77 plowed into the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld was telling his aides to come up with plans for striking Iraq &#8212; even though there was no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the attacks.&quot; Rumsfeld: &quot;Go massive ... Sweep it all up. Things related and not.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19728</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2002 06:07:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>cbs</category>
		<category>cbsnews</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>wtc</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18902/</link>
		<description> As it turns out, Donald Rumsfeld and Saddam Hussein were &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0802-01.htm&quot;&gt;buddies back in the day&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18902</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2002 15:43:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>buddies</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>saddamhussein</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>queequeg</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


