<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with donotcall</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/donotcall</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'donotcall' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:23:12 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:23:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Cell Phones</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37588/Cell%2DPhones</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.donotcall.gov/"&gt;Cell Phone users beware Dec 15th 2004 is the deadline&lt;/a&gt; According to the National Do Not Call List, you have until Dec. 15th 2004 to get on the national &quot;Do not call list&quot; for cell phones. They said that you need to call 1-888-382-1222 from the cell phone that you wish to have put on the &quot;do not call list&quot; to be put on the list. They also said you can do it online.

Registering only takes a minute, is in effect for 5 years and will possibly
save you money (definitely frustration)!  Make sure you register now!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37588</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:23:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cellphones</category>
		<category>donotcall</category>
		<dc:creator>Gooney</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Get Paid to Listen to Telemarketers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31637/Get%2DPaid%2Dto%2DListen%2Dto%2DTelemarketers</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2004/Feb/1024241.htm&quot;&gt; If you can&apos;t beat &apos;em, join &apos;em.&lt;/a&gt; A company named &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adnoodle.com&quot;&gt;AdNoodle&lt;/a&gt; is letting you waive your rights under the Do Not Call list in exchange for cold hard cash. You decide how much it&apos;s worth to you - 50 cents, $1, $2 per minute - to have a friendly chat with your local telemarketing concern and answer a &quot;listening comprehension&quot; quiz afterwards. What&apos;s your conventional wisdom on this one: Are we bargaining ourselves into a win-win situation? Or are we becoming low-priced callgirls for the bottom-feeders of corporate America? We report, you decide. (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=862411&quot;&gt;Fark&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31637</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 03:41:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adnoodle</category>
		<category>donotcall</category>
		<category>telemarketers</category>
		<dc:creator>PrinceValium</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>This is not the 555 area code</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28946/This%2Dis%2Dnot%2Dthe%2D555%2Darea%2Dcode</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fresnobee.com/local/story/7589948p-8498671c.html"&gt;Now&lt;/a&gt; it&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/13/business/media/13call.html?ex=1066708800&amp;en=beed471acddc43d2&amp;ei=5062&amp;partner=GOOGLE&quot;&gt;officially&lt;/a&gt; a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/28759#564343&quot;&gt;trend:&lt;/a&gt; Attacking the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/28557&quot;&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt; of those who &lt;a href=&quot;http://nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/7361.htm&quot;&gt;invade privacy &lt;small&gt;(bottom of page)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/3527&quot;&gt;publicizing&lt;/a&gt; their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/28759&quot;&gt;information.&lt;/a&gt; What&apos;s the verb for this going to be? I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/living/columnists/dave_barry/6649728.htm&quot;&gt;&quot;Barrying&quot;&lt;/a&gt; should be a contender.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28946</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 10:25:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>DaveBarry</category>
		<category>DoNotCall</category>
		<category>NYPost</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>telemarketers</category>
		<category>telemarketing</category>
		<dc:creator>soyjoy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Caller You Have Reached is Unavailable and/or Annoyed</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26993/The%2DCaller%2DYou%2DHave%2DReached%2Dis%2DUnavailable%2Dandor%2DAnnoyed</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2003/07/15/do_not_call/index.html&quot;&gt;The day the dinnertime phone calls stopped. &lt;/a&gt;We&apos;ve &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/24233&quot;&gt;previously discussed &lt;/a&gt;the new national do-not-call list on Mefi, but this Salon piece puts a new spin on the subject. Millions of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib710/aib710c.htm&quot;&gt;rural Americans &lt;/a&gt;will inevitably lose telemarketing jobs because telemarketing will be regulated out of business. But the government isn&apos;t regulating them out of business, it is just providing a way for people to choose not to participate in this business scheme. The people who add their names to the list are the people who are going to hang up in the telelmarketer&apos;s face anyways, so where&apos;s the harm in this list? And what about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-dma.org/government/toptenreasons.shtml&quot;&gt;DMA&apos;s 10 reasons to protect the teleservices industry&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26993</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2003 07:10:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DoNotCall</category>
		<category>DoNotCallList</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>empoloyment</category>
		<category>jobs</category>
		<category>phone</category>
		<category>Salon</category>
		<category>telemarketing</category>
		<category>telephone</category>
		<category>unemployment</category>
		<dc:creator>archimago</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>the short but happy life of eric humphrey gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26963/the%2Dshort%2Dbut%2Dhappy%2Dlife%2Dof%2Deric%2Dhumphrey%2Dgordon</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.crabwalk.com/misc/harvard.php"&gt;the short but happy life of eric humphrey gordon&lt;/a&gt; Forget &quot;Do not call&quot; lists - a better way to get your alma- mater to stop soliciting you. The Harvard Magazine obituary section had to print &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.harvard-magazine.com/classnotes/obituaries.html&quot;&gt;their retraction&lt;/a&gt; in the July/August 2003 issue.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26963</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2003 15:38:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Dead</category>
		<category>DoNotCall</category>
		<category>EricHumpreyGordon</category>
		<category>HarvardMagazine</category>
		<category>Retraction</category>
		<category>Solicit</category>
		<dc:creator>Voyageman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>No More Dinnertime Telemarketing Calls</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26661/No%2DMore%2DDinnertime%2DTelemarketing%2DCalls</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://donotcall.gov/"&gt;No More Dinnertime Telemarketing Calls&lt;/a&gt; Finally, over the objections of the telemarketing industry and to the delight of every American who ever had a romantic dinner at home interrupted by some schlub with a headset, an autodialer and a terrible sales script, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://dodnotcall.gov/&quot;&gt;National Do Not Call Registry&lt;/a&gt; is open for business.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26661</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 03:06:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donotcall</category>
		<category>telemarketing</category>
		<dc:creator>twsf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>FTC&apos;s National</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24233/FTCs%2DNational</link>
		<description> The Federal Trade Commission&apos;s National &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/edcams/donotcall/index.html&quot;&gt;&quot;Do Not Call&quot; Registry&lt;/a&gt;, intended to stop unwanted telemarketing calls, &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;cid=544&amp;u=/ap/20030311/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_do_not_call_2&amp;printer=1&quot;&gt;became law yesterday&lt;/a&gt;. Do telemarketers have a First Amendment right to call you? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-dma.org/&quot;&gt;The Direct Marketing Association&lt;/a&gt;, and industry lobby, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-dma.org/cgi/disppressrelease?article=389&quot;&gt;thinks so&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24233</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:26:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donotcall</category>
		<category>ftc</category>
		<category>telemarketing</category>
		<dc:creator>Steve_at_Linnwood</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>damn telemarketers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23906/damn%2Dtelemarketers</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/877269.asp"&gt;Thought you were rid of the telemarketers?&lt;/a&gt; Perhaps not.  It looks like they&apos;re fighting back to items like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telezapper.com&quot;&gt;TeleZapper&lt;/a&gt; that fake telemarketers into thinking your phone is disconnected by playing the three tones you get if your phone doesn&apos;t work.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.castelhq.com/solutions.htm&quot;&gt;Castel, Inc&lt;/a&gt; claims their DirectQuest software defeats devices like Telezapper by reading the connect messages delivered by your public switched telephone network.  Fave quote - &#8220;It&#8217;s a privacy arms race..&quot;  Will this ever end?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23906</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2003 05:31:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donotcall</category>
		<category>phones</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>telemarketers</category>
		<category>telephones</category>
		<dc:creator>djspicerack</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14102/</link>
		<description> The Federal Trade Commission is seeking to curtail the activities of telemarketers through the creation of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A15842-2002Jan21.html&quot;&gt;national &apos;do-not-call&apos; registry&lt;/a&gt;. But the telemarketing industry says the FTC&apos;s plan would &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21678-2002Jan22.html&quot;&gt;violate their First Amendment rights&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14102</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:26:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donotcall</category>
		<category>federaltradecommission</category>
		<category>firstamendment</category>
		<category>freespeech</category>
		<category>ftc</category>
		<category>telemarketing</category>
		<dc:creator>jjg</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


