<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with dress</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/dress</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'dress' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:26:46 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:26:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>What attire can I wear to the polls on election day?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75431/What%2Dattire%2Dcan%2DI%2Dwear%2Dto%2Dthe%2Dpolls%2Don%2Delection%2Dday</link>
		<description> A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wsaz.com/political/headlines/29962029.html&quot;&gt;dress code&lt;/a&gt; at the polls?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wibw.com/political/headlines/29863794.html&quot;&gt;Many&lt;/a&gt; states have &apos;electioneering&apos; laws in place that can be broadly interpreted to mean that clothing with political messages is not allowed.  Snopes put &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/electioneering.asp&quot;&gt;a page up&lt;/a&gt; advising voters to check with their board of elections.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://wtopnews.com/?nid=104&amp;sid=1485471&quot;&gt;Some election officials&lt;/a&gt; have released &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclupa.org/downloads/PassiveElectioneering.pdf&quot;&gt;statements attempting to clarify&lt;/a&gt; [pdf] the enforcement of their state&apos;s electioneering laws, though those statements aren&apos;t legally binding.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/04/politics/main4501531.shtml&quot;&gt;Other election officials are suing&lt;/a&gt; to keep the broad definition of electioneering in place.  If rules are interpreted to include campaign shirts and buttons, you will likely need to cover the item up, remove it, or otherwise conceal it. With so many new voters, folks who have relocated, differences between the primaries and the general election and rules in flux in many states, I removed the state-by-state listing I originally began constructing in favor of having this post be a place where people can add the most recent state-specific updates as they become available.  Reference - &lt;a href=&quot;http://law.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4685&amp;context=expresso&quot;&gt;2006 document&lt;/a&gt; [pdf] linked from Snopes page with state-by-state information. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75431</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:26:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>attire</category>
		<category>dress</category>
		<category>electioneering</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>snopes</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<category>wear</category>
		<dc:creator>cashman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Life&apos;s a beach in my new burqini!&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57700/Lifes%2Da%2Dbeach%2Din%2Dmy%2Dnew%2Dburqini</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ahiida.com/"&gt;Beachwear and modesty are generally considered mutually exclusive,&lt;/a&gt; leaving only the most modern of Muslim women out in the cold, so to speak. However, an Australian company has tackled the issue with their own line of made-for-the-sun attire specifically catering to a Muslim woman&apos;s need for propreity in matters of apparel. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/121275/burqini_making_waves_in_australia.html&quot;&gt;Even lifeguards are getting in on the act. &lt;/a&gt; I must be frank, until I read a couple of news articles, I thought this was a hoax site.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.57700</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:31:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>burqa</category>
		<category>dress</category>
		<category>muslim</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>zorro astor</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>$15,000 vs. $12.99 for a 12-pack of 2-ply.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54796/15000%2Dvs%2D1299%2Dfor%2Da%2D12pack%2Dof%2D2ply</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cheap-chic-weddings.com/wedding-contest-2006.html"&gt;The 2006 Toilet Paper Wedding Dress Contest Winner Is...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54796</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:13:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>diy</category>
		<category>dress</category>
		<category>paper</category>
		<category>toilet</category>
		<category>tp</category>
		<category>wedding</category>
		<dc:creator>2or3whiskeysodas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Sew a Hot-Looking Dress in a Hour</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53791/Sew%2Da%2DHotLooking%2DDress%2Din%2Da%2DHour</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://rowena.typepad.com/rostitchery/2006/06/one_seam_conver.html&quot;&gt;Here&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; a cute dress that doesn&apos;t need a pattern, has only one seam, can be worn in about a &lt;a href=&quot;http://lydiasilvestry.com/index.php&quot;&gt;bzillion different ways,&lt;/a&gt; looks great on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.craftster.org/forum/index.php?topic=104089.0&quot;&gt;various body types,&lt;/a&gt; and takes only an hour to make.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53791</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:47:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>crafts</category>
		<category>dress</category>
		<category>fashion</category>
		<category>sewing</category>
		<dc:creator>ottereroticist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Don&apos;t I love thee!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52414/Dont%2DI%2Dlove%2Dthee</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.littlebrowndress.com"&gt;365 days.  One brown dress.  A one-woman show against fashion.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;So, here&apos;s the deal - I made this dress and I&apos;m wearing it every day for a year.   I&apos;ll throw snowballs in it (wearing additional clothing layers in cold weather for health &amp;amp; safety), garden in it, rehearse in it, travel in it, dance in it, cook in it, prune my pear trees in it, drink wine in it, sing my baby to sleep in it.&quot;  The project was launched July 7th of last year and is nearing completion.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52414</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:07:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>consumerism</category>
		<category>dress</category>
		<category>fashion</category>
		<category>littlebrowndress</category>
		<dc:creator>arcticwoman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Sperm Dress</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49948/Sperm%2DDress</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/HAUNTED-50s-FERTILITY-Dress-SPERM-PRINT-ala-MONICA-XL_W0QQitemZ8389852177QQcategoryZ48868QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem"&gt;The seller called &apos;em polkadots.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;When I got the dress, my eyes about popped out of my head. These were NOT creamy white polkadots. My mind raced. This was a novelty print, yes, but not of balloons or cheerfully wriggling tadpoles. There&apos;s no way&#8230;could it be!? Could the 1950&apos;s designer Mark-Robbins been so devious as to devise a blue dress covered&#8212;literally covered&#8212;in&#8230;&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49948</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:10:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dress</category>
		<category>ebay</category>
		<category>sperm</category>
		<dc:creator>Mo Nickels</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Ugly wedding dress of the day</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28969/Ugly%2Dwedding%2Ddress%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dday</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.uglyweddingdress.com/"&gt;Here comes the...what the hell is that?&lt;/a&gt; Yes, it&apos;s almost redundant to mention that bridesmaid&apos;s dresses are ugly--I&apos;ve always assumed this was to make the bride look that much better by comparison. But sometimes the bride isn&apos;t doing herself any favors with her sartorial selection.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28969</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:33:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bride</category>
		<category>dress</category>
		<category>wedding</category>
		<dc:creator>adamrice</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


