<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with drugtesting</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/drugtesting</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'drugtesting' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:05:46 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:05:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Not So Fast...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37476/Not%2DSo%2DFast</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://respectfulofotters.blogspot.com/2004_12_01_respectfulofotters_archive.html#110210791125514246"&gt;That BBC article about AIDS and NYC?  Debunked.&lt;/a&gt; This one&apos;s for schroedinger, who posted &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/this_world/4038375.stm&quot; _new&gt;the original BBC story &lt;/a&gt; about the documentary accusing the NYC Association for Children&#8217;s Services of using children in foster care for drug testing experiments without parental consent on MeFi &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/37446&quot; _new&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt; Here&apos;s an  intelligent and well thought out &lt;a href=&quot;http://respectfulofotters.blogspot.com/2004_12_01_respectfulofotters_archive.html#110210791125514246&quot; _new&gt;rebuttal from blogger respectfulofotters&lt;/a&gt; to the points made (and sources used by,) the documentary.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37476</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:05:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AIDS</category>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>debunking</category>
		<category>drugtesting</category>
		<category>experiments</category>
		<category>fostercare</category>
		<category>fosterchildren</category>
		<category>HIV</category>
		<category>medications</category>
		<category>NYC</category>
		<category>treatments</category>
		<dc:creator>zarq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Huffing and Puffing But Not from Running</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34643/Huffing%2Dand%2DPuffing%2DBut%2DNot%2Dfrom%2DRunning</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sportsnetwork.com/default.asp?c=sportsnetwork&amp;amp;page=/nfl/news/ABN3391908.htm"&gt;Ricky Quits Football to Smoke Dope&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;
Ricky Williams knew he&apos;d failed a third drug test and retired from football before his coach found out.
&lt;br&gt;
Says Ricky, &quot;I didn&apos;t quit football because I failed a drug test,&quot; he told the Herald. &quot;I failed a drug test because I was ready to quit football.&quot; 
&lt;br&gt;
Williams said he&apos;s not addicted to marijuana. And I&apos;m sure he can quit anytime he wants to but maybe he got confused and quit his profession instead of his &quot;hobby&quot;?
&lt;br&gt;
Is this the first time a star athlete&apos;s quit because he wants to hang out and smoke dope?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34643</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:28:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>drugtesting</category>
		<category>football</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>rickywilliams</category>
		<dc:creator>fenriq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Some skin scrapings too?....</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30786/Some%2Dskin%2Dscrapings%2Dtoo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/15/tech/main593356.shtml"&gt;Hello&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=Gattaca&amp;spell=1&quot;&gt;Gattaca&lt;/a&gt; : &quot;The federal government is planning to overhaul its employee drug testing program to include scrutiny of workers&apos; hair, saliva and sweat, a shift that could spur more businesses to revise screening for millions of their own workers.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30786</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:41:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>drugtesting</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>screening</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20023/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/athletics/2259347.stm"&gt;New 100m world record&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&quot;Once again, the 100m record holder is truly the fastest man on earth&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20023</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2002 10:13:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>100m</category>
		<category>athletics</category>
		<category>drugtesting</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>running</category>
		<category>worldrecord</category>
		<dc:creator>daveg</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18223/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/?id=2067710"&gt;&#8220;Students, Thomas says, endanger themselves.&lt;/a&gt; And that is enough for the court to approve the program. It&apos;s enough to force every single American to also submit to suspicionless drug-testing, but Thomas neglects to mention this.&quot; The Justices are mostly old and frail and wield massive power. They should be tested for their &quot;protection&quot; and so the American public can be sure they are &quot;physically fit, and have unimpeachable integrity and judgment.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18223</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2002 17:00:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>drugtesting</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>raaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18090/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/773081.asp"&gt;Court gives the go-ahead on random drug testing for non-athlete students.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;Given the nationwide epidemic of drug use, and the evidence of increased drug use in Tecumseh schools, it was entirely reasonable for the school district to enact this particular drug testing policy,&quot;  Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the decision.&lt;/i&gt;

Drug tests which really only target marijuana use (alcohol, cocaine, opiates leave the body shortly after use) can now be randomly given to students involved in extra-curricular activities. Is this a further step in the &quot;my anti-drug&quot; campaign? Is debate or drama club YOUR anti-drug? By denying student drug users the privilege of participating in activities, aren&apos;t we just marginalizing them further and making the problem worse? What will it be? Drugs or getting involved?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18090</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2002 12:18:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>drugtesting</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>schools</category>
		<category>students</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>Hammerikaner</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15755/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A158-2002Mar21.html&quot;&gt;Medical Records Confidentiality - An End to Privacy?&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The Bush Administration yesterday proposed changing some of the federal rules designed to protect the confidentiality of Americans&apos; medical records, including &lt;b&gt;the ability of patients to decide in advance who should be able to use their personal health information&lt;/b&gt;.&quot; 
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The Day After 9-11, &lt;a href=http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/10106#129941&gt;the debate started.&lt;/a&gt;
&quot;People would probably not protest FBI snooping so much if we did not need to guard our privacy so tightly, if we did not have to worry about medical records being used against us by employers or insurance companies ... (More info: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/GII_NII/Telemedicine/Privacy/&quot;&gt;EFF: Privacy - Medical &amp;amp; Psychiatric Records and Drug Testing&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.privacy2000.org/&quot;&gt;Privacy2000.org&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arl.org/info/frn/other/matrix.pdf&quot;&gt;The Search and Seizure of Electronic Information&lt;/a&gt;.)
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
You have ONE MONTH to give &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/congress/&quot;&gt;your comments on Medical Records Confidentiality&lt;/a&gt;. Congressional approval is not required.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15755</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2002 19:15:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bushadministration</category>
		<category>confidentiality</category>
		<category>drugtesting</category>
		<category>healthcare</category>
		<category>medicalrecords</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<dc:creator>sheauga</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7884/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thewhizzinator.com/"&gt;Who needs a Whizzinator?&lt;/a&gt; Apparently they &lt;A target=_blank href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2001/05/10/urine.DTL&quot;&gt;aren&apos;t fooling parole officers&lt;/a&gt;.  What happened to the good old herbal tea workaround?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7884</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2001 09:41:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>drugtesting</category>
		<category>urine</category>
		<category>Whizzinator</category>
		<dc:creator>suprfli</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


