<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with dvd and copyprotection</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/dvd+copyprotection</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'dvd' and 'copyprotection' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:08:57 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:08:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>For whom these vile shackles, These long-prepared irons?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41490/For%2Dwhom%2Dthese%2Dvile%2Dshackles%2DThese%2Dlongprepared%2Dirons</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.allpeers.com/blog/?page_id=113"&gt;Vive la Revolution.&lt;/a&gt; Are DVD Copy Protection technologies now illegal in France? (via techdirt).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41490</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:08:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyprotection</category>
		<category>dvd</category>
		<category>france</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<dc:creator>seanyboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18372/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/26139.html"&gt;Homer Simpson: Hack your DVD player.&lt;/a&gt; It seems in countries in which the DVD Copy Control Authority doesn&apos;t own the government, even the giants of corpmedia don&apos;t like the &quot;protection&quot; features the platform foists on consumers. On Fox&apos;s Simpsons UK DVD release FAQ page, Homer himself says &quot;I have no idea whatsoever what regional coding means. But it is essential that you buy a multi-regional player. Do it now.&quot; Is the DVD region-coding system really only relevant in the United States?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18372</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:44:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyprotection</category>
		<category>digitalrightsmanagement</category>
		<category>drm</category>
		<category>dvd</category>
		<category>dvdregions</category>
		<category>dvds</category>
		<category>encryption</category>
		<category>fox</category>
		<category>homersimpson</category>
		<category>multiregion</category>
		<category>regions</category>
		<category>simpsons</category>
		<category>thesimpsons</category>
		<dc:creator>Vetinari</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17847/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992404"&gt;Harry Potter released unprotected.&lt;/a&gt; In a move that makes me say both &quot;Wha?&quot; and &quot;Kickass!&quot;, Warner Bros chose to release the Harry Potter DVD and VHS home versions sans the Macrovision copy protection. It could stand to be quite an experiment, or quite a blunder on their part.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17847</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2002 20:32:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Blunder</category>
		<category>CopyProtection</category>
		<category>Copyright</category>
		<category>DRM</category>
		<category>DVD</category>
		<category>HarryPotter</category>
		<category>Macrovision</category>
		<category>VHS</category>
		<category>WarnerBrothers</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13739/</link>
		<description> Who says DeCSS litigation is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vnunet.com/News/1128198&quot;&gt;dead&lt;/a&gt;?  Norwegian court indicts the fellow who cracked DVD protection.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13739</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:53:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyprotection</category>
		<category>dead</category>
		<category>decss</category>
		<category>dvd</category>
		<category>hacker</category>
		<category>litigation</category>
		<category>norway</category>
		<dc:creator>donkeysuck</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/292/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,32263,00.html"&gt;So the DVD copy protection was cracked,&lt;/a&gt; and it&apos;s interesting to hear the comments from the industry. The DVD Forum&apos;s release makes the hackers sound awful. The DVD folks feel like they&apos;ve been ripped off. Can&apos;t these motion picture and DVD industry folks see this as a good thing? A couple hackers decrypted what was supposed to be a secure format and they&apos;re horrified? They should be horrified at the idiots that created the weak &apos;protection&apos; in the first place. These hackers just did the industry a great service. They found a gaping security hole before good recordable DVDs ever came out! I&apos;m surprised hackers are vilified instead of being offered lucrative positions as security experts.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.292</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1999 10:15:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyprotection</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>DVD</category>
		<category>DVDs</category>
		<category>hacked</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


