<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with earnings</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/earnings</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'earnings' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:33:53 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:33:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20309/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/2002/09/13/400fictional.html"&gt;Who&apos;s richer:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/2002/09/13/400fictional_12.html&quot;&gt;Montgomery Burns&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/2002/09/13/400fictional_14.html&quot;&gt;Cruella De Vil&lt;/a&gt;, or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/2002/09/13/400fictional_8.html&quot;&gt;Bruce Wayne&lt;/a&gt;? On the heels of last month&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/19100&quot;&gt;Top-Earning Dead Celebrities&lt;/a&gt; list, Forbes brings us their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/2002/09/13/400fictional.html&quot;&gt;Fictional Fifteen&lt;/a&gt;, the wealthiest made-up people in the world. Anyone see any egregious exclusions?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20309</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:33:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>celebrities</category>
		<category>earnings</category>
		<category>fictionalcelebrities</category>
		<category>forbes</category>
		<category>topearnings</category>
		<dc:creator>GreyWingnut</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16753/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1099333"&gt;Do short men get short-changed?&lt;/a&gt; Any real life experiences to back up or refute this study? I found this very interesting: &lt;i&gt;&quot;If a teenage sense of social exclusion influences future earnings, it may have great implications for youngsters from minority groups.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16753</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2002 05:21:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>earnings</category>
		<category>Economist</category>
		<category>height</category>
		<category>salary</category>
		<category>short</category>
		<category>tall</category>
		<category>TheEconomist</category>
		<category>wage</category>
		<dc:creator>bittennails</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15156/</link>
		<description> It&apos;s easy to think of lawyers as greedy, overpaid blood-sucking pigs.  But do we have any clue &lt;a href=http://www.law.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/AppLogic+FTContentServer?pagename=law/View&amp;c=Article&amp;cid=ZZZTRJVS7YC&amp;live=true&amp;cst=1&amp;pc=0&amp;pa=0&amp;s=News&amp;ExpIgnore=true&amp;showsummary=0&gt;what lawyers earn&lt;/a&gt;? Yes we do, thanks to American Lawyer Media&apos;s (via law.com) annual roundup of lawyer compensation. Not all of which is surprising.  For example, partners at the top corporate firms like Wachtell Lipton, or Cravath, Swaine &amp;amp; Moore or Davis Polk each averaged millions in 2001 ($3,285,000, $2,245,000 and $1,740,000, respectively). Even piddly little first year associates at those firms got $125,000 to start.  (We&apos;re talking 24-year-old law school grads with precisely zero professional experience and know-how. Zero.)  But most newbie lawyers don&apos;t win those jobs.  Also difficult to land are entry-level positions at district attorneys&apos; offices, but they&apos;re not nearly as lucrative.  A junior Manhattan D.A. earned $45,000 last year (up from $42,000 in 2000). But locking up criminals beats toiling for civil rights at a not-for-profit like the New York Civil Liberties Union, which paid entry-level lawyers only $35,000 last year.  Over all, best off are lawyers who work for big companies.  Top counsel at IBM last year earned a measly $506,000 in cash (salary &amp;amp; bonus), but throw in stocks &amp;amp; options and his compensation totaled $7,795,613.  Compared to that, you have to worry about the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court whose family in 2001 had to struggle along on $192,600. 

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15156</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:25:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>earnings</category>
		<category>income</category>
		<category>law.com</category>
		<category>lawyers</category>
		<category>salary</category>
		<dc:creator>jellybuzz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


