<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with echelon and surveillance</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/echelon+surveillance</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'echelon' and 'surveillance' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2001 22:39:01 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2001 22:39:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8800/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,44984,00.html"&gt;European Parliament says Echelon exists&lt;/a&gt; and is more or less powerless to stop it.  All the more reason for government and industry to create encryption standards.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8800</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2001 22:39:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>communications</category>
		<category>Echelon</category>
		<category>encryption</category>
		<category>EU</category>
		<category>EuropeanUnion</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8231/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://pidp.ewc.hawaii.edu/pireport/2001/June/06-11-01.htm"&gt;Echelon rumored to be used in NZ spying on Fiji&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/7983&quot;&gt;Echelon&lt;/a&gt;, as seen on TV, is suggested to monitor gobzillions of electronic communications. People are starting to wonder if New Zealand used Echelon to monitor the progress of the May 2000 coup and hostage taking in Fiji, in addition to the tradition undercover operations. Memorable quotation: &quot;It is not a question of if others are spying on Fiji but of who, how and, to a much lesser extent, why.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8231</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:06:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>coup</category>
		<category>Echelon</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>Fiji</category>
		<category>NewZealand</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7983/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/newsid_1357000/1357264.stm"&gt;ALL YOUR EMAIL ARE BELONG TO US!&lt;/a&gt; How serious is this threat?  What precautions do you routinely take?  What precautions do you think you *should* be taking?  What viable options do we have today, for those of us who aren&apos;t computer programmers by profession?  And how secure are they, anyway?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7983</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2001 09:56:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>echelon</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>encryption</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7015/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nf/20010411/tc/8898_1.html"&gt;The ACLU wants to protect your privacy&lt;/a&gt; from government electronic surveillance programs like Echelon and Carnivore. Their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/privacyrights/&quot;&gt;full page ad&lt;/a&gt; in today&apos;s NYT claims &lt;a href=&quot;http://memory.loc.gov/const/bor.html&quot;&gt;4th amendment&lt;/a&gt; rights are being violated by the US government, which is overstepping their bounds, and nearly free of up-to-date laws. Is it to late or can anything be done to protect civilian electronic communication?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7015</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2001 07:55:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>4thAmendment</category>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Carnivore</category>
		<category>eavesdropping</category>
		<category>Echelon</category>
		<category>ElectronicSurveillance</category>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>FourthAmendment</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


