<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with echelon</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/echelon</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'echelon' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:19:08 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:19:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Mobile Phones of Greek PM, Government tapped</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48811/Mobile%2DPhones%2Dof%2DGreek%2DPM%2DGovernment%2Dtapped</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=oddlyEnoughNews&amp;amp;storyID=2006-02-02T172158Z_01_L02784735_RTRIDST_0_OUKOE-UK-GREECE-TAPPING.XML"&gt;The Greek government has just admitted&lt;/a&gt; that unknown parties have been tapping the mobile phones of  the Prime Minister, government ministers, military and police officials and others.  Details are still a bit sketchy, but it looks like someone installed a stealth redirecting software in the routers of &lt;a  _top href=&quot;http://www.vodafone.gr&quot;&gt;Vodafone Greece&lt;/a&gt; --which has admitted to discovering the taps in March of 05.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48811</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:19:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>echelon</category>
		<category>greece</category>
		<category>intercepts</category>
		<category>phonetaps</category>
		<category>vodafone</category>
		<dc:creator>costas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Echelon: 60 Minutes discussion</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47729/Echelon%2D60%2DMinutes%2Ddiscussion</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cryptome.org/echelon-60min.htm"&gt;Echelon&lt;/a&gt; This is what we know--or do not know--about NSA prgram called Echelon, from 60 Minute show (TV) in 2000. If we assume this what had been going on and there were some sort of restraints for internal spying, then what is going on now? This evening I had heard on radio that the White House claimed that only calls going in and out of the country might be monitored. But this early interview suggests that such calls were monitored previous to the &quot;new&quot; approach. Why were legal restraints put in place calling for judicial hearings? Because of spying abuse done under Nixon. Those restraints are now removed.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47729</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:40:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>60minutes</category>
		<category>echelon</category>
		<category>nsa</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Want to know the hardware behind Echelon?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40132/Want%2Dto%2Dknow%2Dthe%2Dhardware%2Dbehind%2DEchelon</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.techworld.com/storage/news/index.cfm?NewsID=2430"&gt;Want to know the hardware behind Echelon?&lt;/a&gt; The other day I posted a book (Chatter) review about NSA.  In this follow-up, the equipment used.

&quot;Aside from using the system for industrial espionage and bypassing international and national laws to listen in on people, it is also used to listen out for people like Osama bin Laden and assorted terrorists in the hope of preventing attacks.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40132</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 12:46:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Echelon</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>surveilliance</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Extreme Anti-Piracy Measures</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35495/Extreme%2DAntiPiracy%2DMeasures</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://homepage.mac.com/digitalschism/products.html&quot;&gt;Echelon&lt;/a&gt; is a Mac application that, if you try to register it with a pirated serial number, will &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unsanity.org/archives/000361.php&quot;&gt;delete your entire home directory&lt;/a&gt;. (Windows users: This is a very, very bad thing, second only to wiping the entire drive.) Is this a good way to fight piracy, and can it even be legal?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35495</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2004 22:42:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antipiracymeasures</category>
		<category>echelon</category>
		<category>legality</category>
		<category>mac</category>
		<category>macintosh</category>
		<dc:creator>jjg</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8800/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,44984,00.html"&gt;European Parliament says Echelon exists&lt;/a&gt; and is more or less powerless to stop it.  All the more reason for government and industry to create encryption standards.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8800</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2001 22:39:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>communications</category>
		<category>Echelon</category>
		<category>encryption</category>
		<category>EU</category>
		<category>EuropeanUnion</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8231/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://pidp.ewc.hawaii.edu/pireport/2001/June/06-11-01.htm"&gt;Echelon rumored to be used in NZ spying on Fiji&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/7983&quot;&gt;Echelon&lt;/a&gt;, as seen on TV, is suggested to monitor gobzillions of electronic communications. People are starting to wonder if New Zealand used Echelon to monitor the progress of the May 2000 coup and hostage taking in Fiji, in addition to the tradition undercover operations. Memorable quotation: &quot;It is not a question of if others are spying on Fiji but of who, how and, to a much lesser extent, why.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8231</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:06:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>coup</category>
		<category>Echelon</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>Fiji</category>
		<category>NewZealand</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7983/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/newsid_1357000/1357264.stm"&gt;ALL YOUR EMAIL ARE BELONG TO US!&lt;/a&gt; How serious is this threat?  What precautions do you routinely take?  What precautions do you think you *should* be taking?  What viable options do we have today, for those of us who aren&apos;t computer programmers by profession?  And how secure are they, anyway?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7983</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2001 09:56:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>echelon</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>encryption</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7015/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nf/20010411/tc/8898_1.html"&gt;The ACLU wants to protect your privacy&lt;/a&gt; from government electronic surveillance programs like Echelon and Carnivore. Their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/privacyrights/&quot;&gt;full page ad&lt;/a&gt; in today&apos;s NYT claims &lt;a href=&quot;http://memory.loc.gov/const/bor.html&quot;&gt;4th amendment&lt;/a&gt; rights are being violated by the US government, which is overstepping their bounds, and nearly free of up-to-date laws. Is it to late or can anything be done to protect civilian electronic communication?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7015</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2001 07:55:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>4thAmendment</category>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Carnivore</category>
		<category>eavesdropping</category>
		<category>Echelon</category>
		<category>ElectronicSurveillance</category>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>FourthAmendment</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


