<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with editor</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/editor</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'editor' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:25:00 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:25:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>whole lotta uploading.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74348/whole%2Dlotta%2Duploading</link>
		<description> Who needs Photoshop when you can have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pixlr.com/app/&quot;&gt;Pixlr ?&lt;/a&gt; I have no idea if this works ( surely it takes a long time to upload images ), but it at least looks interesting - an open source competitor to photoshop would be welcome. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74348</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:25:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editor</category>
		<category>free</category>
		<category>hull</category>
		<category>photo</category>
		<category>photoshop</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>sgt.serenity</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&#8220;Please do the necessary things to stop production of the book.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65628/%3FPlease%2Ddo%2Dthe%2Dnecessary%2Dthings%2Dto%2Dstop%2Dproduction%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dbook%3F</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;&quot;&#8220;If the book were to be published as it is in its present edited form, I may never write another story, that&#8217;s how closely, God Forbid, some of those stories are to my sense of regaining my health and mental well-being.&#8221;&lt;/em&gt;

The New York Times &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/17/books/17carver.html?8dpc=&amp;_r=1&amp;adxnnlx=1192593984-tdxkR%20d1qmEMTa9ylU9XDg&amp;pagewanted=all&quot;&gt;reported today&lt;/a&gt; that Raymond Carver&apos;s widow, Tess Gallagher, is pushing to republish the stories in Carver&apos;s acclaimed 1981 breakout collection, &quot;What We Talk About When We Talk About Love,&quot; in their original, unedited form. Carver&apos;s editor at the time, Gordon Lish, is &lt;a href=&quot;http://donswaim.com/nytimes.carverchronicles.html&quot;&gt;acknowledged &lt;/a&gt;to have aggressively edited many stories this collection almost to the point of &quot;a wholesale rewrite.&quot;  The two examples &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/Carver.pdf&quot;&gt;provided&lt;/a&gt; of endings before and after the Lish edits [pdf; see pgs 5-7]  raise unsettling questions. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65628</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:51:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>author</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>editor</category>
		<category>fiction</category>
		<category>GordonLish</category>
		<category>minimalism</category>
		<category>RaymondCarver</category>
		<category>shortstories</category>
		<dc:creator>sock it to me monkey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>According to the Internet ...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62092/According%2Dto%2Dthe%2DInternet</link>
		<description> Wikipedia claims it has &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia&quot;&gt;an accuracy rate similar to that of Encyclopedia Britannica&lt;/a&gt;. But are Wikipedia articles accurate enough to be relied on? The media &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;ned=us&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;as_drrb=q&amp;as_qdr=w&amp;as_mind=7&amp;as_minm=6&amp;as_maxd=14&amp;as_maxm=6&amp;q=%22according+to+wikipedia%22&quot;&gt; frequently cite to the free encyclopedia&lt;/a&gt; despite a chance the information might be wildly inaccurate. In an effort to improve the accuracy and quality of articles, Wikipedia&apos;s internal editorial team has &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:1.0/ASSESS#Grades&quot;&gt;assessed and graded the content of 300,000 articles&lt;/a&gt; (out of 1.8 million articles in English alone.) One obvious way to improve accuracy is to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/060201grieselhuber/&quot;&gt;reveal editor names&lt;/a&gt;, such as on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Main_Page&quot;&gt;Citizendium&lt;/a&gt; (as previously posted on MeFi.) A simpler idea, however, might &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.primedigit.com/wikifix&quot;&gt;rely on a color scheme&lt;/a&gt; to automatically alert users to the accuracy of the article (or lack thereof).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62092</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:15:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>accuracy</category>
		<category>editor</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>reliability</category>
		<category>wikipedia</category>
		<dc:creator>Happydaz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>New Online Image Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49822/New%2DOnline%2DImage%2DEditor</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://pixoh.com&quot;&gt;Pixoh&lt;/a&gt; is a new online simple image editor in the vein of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pxn8.com&quot;&gt;PXN8&lt;/a&gt;.  Pixoh, however, allows quick image import and export from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com&quot;&gt;Flickr&lt;/a&gt; or upload any other webpage via &lt;a href=&quot;http://pixoh.com/bookmarklet/&quot;&gt;bookmarklet&lt;/a&gt;. At the moment, only the most basic of editing tools are available, but the creators - in the spirit of Web2.0 openness - promise new &lt;a href=&quot;http://pixoh.com/features/&quot;&gt;features&lt;/a&gt; based on &lt;a href=&quot;http://pixoh.reddit.com/&quot;&gt;user votes&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;Effect for MeFi? Oversized &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/10644&quot;&gt;inline&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/10408&quot;&gt;images&lt;/a&gt; won&apos;t know what hit &apos;em.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49822</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:21:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editor</category>
		<category>images</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>pictures</category>
		<category>startup</category>
		<dc:creator>youarenothere</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Corrections</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39836/The%2DCorrections</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/index.ssf?050228ta_talk_remnick"&gt;The Grammarian.&lt;/a&gt; Miss Gould, as she was known to everyone at the New Yorker, died last week, at the age of eighty-seven. She worked at the magazine for fifty-four years, most of them as its Grammarian (a title invented for her). A typical &#8220;Gould proof&#8221; was filled with the lightly pencilled tracery of her objections, suggestions, and abbreviated queries: &#8220;emph?&#8221; &#8220;ind.,&#8221; &#8220;mean this?&#8221;. Writes David Remnick: &quot;She confronted the galley proofs of writers as various as Joseph Mitchell, J. D. Salinger, Janet Flanner--well, everyone, really.&quot;. More inside.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39836</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:15:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>editor</category>
		<category>grammar</category>
		<category>grammarian</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<dc:creator>matteo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Pardon hyperbole</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38786/Pardon%2Dhyperbole</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://me.sphere.pl/indexen.htm"&gt;A multiplayer text editor&lt;/a&gt; . Free and realtime. I think this is my new favorite thing.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38786</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:52:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editor</category>
		<category>realtime</category>
		<category>text</category>
		<dc:creator>31d1</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Letters to the Editor, By Jack O&apos;Neil, Sewickley</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30970/Letters%2Dto%2Dthe%2DEditor%2DBy%2DJack%2DONeil%2DSewickley</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://juggernautco.typepad.com/jack_oneil_sewickley/"&gt;Letters to the Editor, By Jack O&apos;Neil, Sewickley&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30970</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:34:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editor</category>
		<category>jackoneil</category>
		<category>letter</category>
		<category>Letters</category>
		<category>letterstotheeditor</category>
		<category>oneil</category>
		<category>sewickley</category>
		<dc:creator>filchyboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15544/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/?id=2063191"&gt;&lt;/a&gt; In light of Steven Speilberg&apos;s editing of the soon to be re-re-released &quot;E.T.&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/?id=2063191&quot;&gt;Slate offers its own (mostly funny) editing suggestions for the remaining Speilberg canon. &lt;/a&gt;   By the way, is anyone else repulsed by what Speilberg&apos;s doing?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15544</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2002 08:39:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Editing</category>
		<category>Editor</category>
		<category>Slate</category>
		<category>Speilberg</category>
		<category>StevenSpeilberg</category>
		<dc:creator>adrober</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15463/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,216323,00.html"&gt;Business magazine editor sleeps with interviewee.&lt;/a&gt; Harvard Business Review editor Suzy Wetlaufer interviews retired GE CEO Jack Welch for HBR.  They begin a torrid romance (Welch is, of course, still married to his second wife.)  Other editors find out about the romance and Wetlaufer cancels her story.  Other HBR editors call for her resignation and the managing editor merely reassigns her.  2 other HBR editors quit in disgust. You can&apos;t make this stuff up!  
&lt;br&gt;
Additional coverage via &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&amp;c=Article&amp;cid=FT35I465NYC&amp;live=true&quot;&gt;Financial Times&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/068/business/Review_s_editor_stepping_aside+.shtml&quot;&gt;Boston Globe&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/721389.asp?cp1=1&quot;&gt;MSNBC&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15463</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2002 15:11:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editor</category>
		<category>HarvardBusinessReview</category>
		<category>HBR</category>
		<category>impartiality</category>
		<category>JackWelch</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>scandal</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>SuzyWetlaufer</category>
		<dc:creator>gen</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


