<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with elections and Iraq</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/elections+Iraq</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'elections' and 'Iraq' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:22:51 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:22:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>&quot;We will talk to each other, and we will connect with each other, and we will weave the country together like a piece of cloth.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47631/We%2Dwill%2Dtalk%2Dto%2Deach%2Dother%2Dand%2Dwe%2Dwill%2Dconnect%2Dwith%2Deach%2Dother%2Dand%2Dwe%2Dwill%2Dweave%2Dthe%2Dcountry%2Dtogether%2Dlike%2Da%2Dpiece%2Dof%2Dcloth</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4531904.stm"&gt;Newsfilter: Iraq votes for a permanent government.&lt;/a&gt; Despite warnings from insurgents and al Qaeda that the elections are &quot;the work of Satan&quot;, estimates are that over &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/4530700.stm&quot;&gt;10 million of the 15 million eligible voters&lt;/a&gt; have cast ballots for their first non-interim government, including many Sunni Muslims at the urging of their leaders.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47631</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:22:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2005</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<dc:creator>loquax</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Britain&apos;s new opposition party?!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41413/Britains%2Dnew%2Dopposition%2Dparty</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://alxt.net/archives/2005/01/07/british-politics-round-up/"&gt;Britain&apos;s new opposition party?!&lt;/a&gt; Despite &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=4423673&quot;&gt;outraising and outspending&lt;/a&gt; all other parties, Britain&apos;s conservative Tory party is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000102&amp;sid=a9ieDOlAYYKI&amp;refer=uk&quot;&gt;falling in the polls&lt;/a&gt; to P.M. Tony Blair&apos;s &quot;New Labour&quot; party. This collapse seems likely to increase; just days after conservative media mogul Rupert Murdoch indicated his  &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/election/story/0,15803,1463231,00.html&quot;&gt;love of cheap labour&lt;/a&gt;, his paper &lt;i&gt;&quot;The Sun&quot;&lt;/i&gt; is &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,14173,1464382,00.html&quot;&gt;endorsing Blair.&lt;/a&gt;

What isn&apos;t being pointed out, though, is that &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.scotsman.com/politics.cfm?id=409652005&quot;&gt;the Liberal Democrats are gaining former Labour voters just as fast&lt;/a&gt; as Labour is gaining conservative voters. A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whoshouldyouvotefor.com&quot;&gt;British public opinion site&lt;/a&gt; indicates that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whoshouldyouvotefor.com/190Kdata.pdf&quot;&gt;43% of its visitors support LibDem policies&lt;/a&gt;, while the Guardian&apos;s unofficial &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/observer/archives/2005/04/21/introducing_the_pollulike.html&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;poll-u-like&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; shows 45% support for the LibDems, even though The Guardian has encouraged its readers to &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/election/comment/0,15803,1453088,00.html&quot;&gt;&quot;hold their nose&quot;&lt;/a&gt; and vote for Blair. Given that prior election polls in Britain have been off &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,1463797,00.html&quot;&gt;by as much as 19%&lt;/a&gt;, could there be a major shift here?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41413</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:40:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Blair</category>
		<category>Britain</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>LibDem</category>
		<category>Liberal</category>
		<category>Tory</category>
		<category>U.K.</category>
		<dc:creator>insomnia_lj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iraq: The Real Election</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41297/Iraq%2DThe%2DReal%2DElection</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;If the election was to mark the point from which Iraqis would settle their differences through politics and not through violence, it failed; for those responsible for the insurgency&#8212; not only those planting suicide bombs but those running the organizations responsible for them and the leaders of the community that has shown itself sympathetic enough to the insurgents&apos; cause to shelter them&#8212;did not take part. The political burden of the elections was to bring those who felt frightened or alienated by the new dispensation into the political process, so they could express their opposition through politics and not through violence; the task, that is, was to attract Sunnis to the polls and thereby to isolate the extremists. And in this, partly because of an electoral system that the Sunnis felt, with some reason, was unfairly stacked against them, the election failed.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17961&quot; title=&quot;On Election Day, Kurds voted for the Kurdish list, Shiites voted for the Shiite list, a relative handful, about 12 percent, voted for the Allawi list&#8212; and the Sunnis made their presence known by not voting at all. The election, in effect, was an ethnic census. In the ideal vision of a post-Saddam Iraq, the people would have come out to bless the new political dispensation, in which the Shiites assume their rightful place as the majority party and the Kurds and especially the Sunnis, the erstwhile elite who throughout its modern history had ruled Iraq, take their place as proud, active, and politically vital minorities. This is not what happened on January 30. Shiites won a majority, but not enough under the peculiar rules imposed by the occupation to form a government. Kurds, turning out in enormous numbers for their single list, were overrepresented in the new assembly and gained, in effect, a veto over who would form the new government. And finally, little more than one in ten Iraqis came out and voted for Allawi, dashing American hopes that he could remain in power. Television cameras, which could only show what was before them in the polling places, could not show the day&apos;s critical actors, the Sunnis, who did not appear. The real story on Election Day was that the Sunnis didn&apos;t vote.&quot;&gt;Iraq: The Real Election&lt;/a&gt;. See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:1BPkb06f-dMJ:www.carnegieendowment.org/files/PB36.ottaway.FINAL.pdf++%22Iraq:+Without+Consensus,+Democracy+Is+Not+the+Answer%22+&amp;hl=en&quot; title=&quot;Yes, Iraqis voted and took considerable personal risk to do so. But all first elections following a period of repression attract a high level of voter participation. It is in countries where elections are routine and taken for granted that people do not bother to vote. But no matter how much individuals want a peaceful political process, in a country beset by violence guns may still speak louder than ballots, and election results can be swept aside, as in Haiti after 1990 elections, Angola in 1992, and Cambodia in 1993. Or elections results can be made utterly irrelevant by the broader political context, as in South Vietnam, where in 1967 citizens participated in large numbers in a presidential election, leading the Johnson administration to conclude that new government would have enough legitmacy to change the course of the war. The possibility that election results will be made irrelevant by the broader political context unfortunately exists in Iraq today. The insurgency is not defeated and violence continues, but this is not the most serious problem in the long run, although it is the most dramatically visible one in the short run. The greatest challenge to the consolidation of the democratic political process that the elections supposedly started is the nature of the vote. Iraqi citizens largely voted their identity in these elections. Kurds voted for Kurdish parties, Shias for Shia parties, and Sunnis voted very little. Few voted for parties that could be considered in any sense nondenominational. It should not come as a surprise that Iraqis voted this way. This happens regularly in divided countries where communal identities have become highly politicized, heightening tensions and even undermining the state. The disintegration of Yugoslavia started with successful elections in Slovenia and Croatia that brought to power nationalist parties that rejected the old, multiethnic Yugoslavia in favor of new countries that identified with a specific group.&quot;&gt;Iraq: Without Consensus, Democracy Is Not the Answer&lt;/a&gt;. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/PB36.ottaway.FINAL.pdf&quot; title=&quot;The elections were a success, but they do not ensure that Iraqis can now agree on a constitutional formula that accommodates the demands of all groups and keeps the country together. Democracy as separation of powers, checks and balances, and protection of individual rights has not proven enough to avoid conflict in other deeply divided societies. Iraqis will have to confront their differences and negotiate a solution. If they fail, the United States will be faced with a choice of whether to keep the country together by force or get out&#8212;and it is better to find out sooner rather than later.&quot;&gt;pdf&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41297</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:45:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Wine. Is. Red!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39410/Wine%2DIs%2DRed</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.michaeltotten.com/archives/000730.html"&gt;Drinking with Christopher Hitchens and the Iraqis&lt;/a&gt; Blogger Michael J. Totten recounts a night out with several angry Iraqis and one famous polemicist.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39410</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 13:56:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>bloggers</category>
		<category>christopherhitchens</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>hitchens</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqelection</category>
		<category>iraqis</category>
		<category>spiritofamerica</category>
		<dc:creator>Asparagirl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Disenfranchisement</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39265/Disenfranchisement</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.ft.com/cms/s/583e9bea-7588-11d9-9608-00000e2511c8.html"&gt;Elections on the US model?&lt;/a&gt; Now that the voting is done, questions are starting to arise . . . Sunni Moslems in Kirkuk had an exemption from the boycott of the vote.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.ft.com/cms/s/583e9bea-7588-11d9-9608-00000e2511c8.html &quot;&gt;But of 38 designated polling centres in the Hawija district, only 19 actually opened, and the electoral commission had only sent 50,000 ballots to the district, even though more than 100,000 voters were on the rolls.&lt;/a&gt;  Of course, things like that happen often in places new to voting, like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/1100428444286470.xml&quot;&gt;Ohio.&lt;/a&gt;  But wait, there&apos;s more!  &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/210350_iraq02.html&quot;&gt;Kurdish Christians were not able to vote when balloting materials arrived inexplicably late, and Iraq&apos;s interim president said a shortage of ballots at some polling places may have kept tens of thousands from voting.&lt;/a&gt;  There&apos;s been a lot of news about suspicious elections  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canadiancontent.net/commtr/article_725.html&quot;&gt;all over&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ericblumrich.com/gta.html&quot;&gt;the world&lt;/a&gt; during the last few years.  How can we &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blackboxvoting.org/&quot;&gt;restore our faith&lt;/a&gt; in the democratic process?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39265</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:25:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<dc:creator>kyrademon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>hey cheerleaders!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39207/hey%2Dcheerleaders</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n03/wein01_.html"&gt;What I Heard about Iraq&lt;/a&gt; --from 1992 until today. head-spinning.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39207</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:36:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>lies</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>Saddam</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>hahah!! history repeats itself.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39182/hahah%2Dhistory%2Drepeats%2Ditself</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_01/005556.php"&gt;United States officials were surprised and heartened today at the size of turnout in [insert country]&apos;s presidential election despite a [insert terror group] terrorist campaign to disrupt the voting.&lt;/a&gt; According to reports from [insert besieged capital city], 83 per cent of the 5.85 million registered voters cast their ballots yesterday. Many of them risked reprisals threatened by the [insert terror group].&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
....A successful election has long been seen as the keystone in President [insert idiotic Texas Republican]&apos;s policy of encouraging the growth of constitutional processes in [insert besieged country]. The election was the culmination of a constitutional development that began in [insert date], to which President [insert idiotic Texas Republican] gave his personal commitment when he met [foreign puppet politician], the chief of state, in Honolulu in February.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Dateline?  Sept. 4th, 1967.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Fact-Checked with archived NYT links at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/1/31/2335/87390&quot;&gt;Daily KOS&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39182</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:49:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dailykos</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>vietnam</category>
		<dc:creator>taumeson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iraqi GOTV</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38862/Iraqi%2DGOTV</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD85105"&gt;&quot;Because We Have a Duty to Build Iraq, I Will Participate in the Elections.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  MEMRI translates Iraqi election videos (clips &lt;a href=&quot;http://memritv.org/Search.asp?ACT=S9&amp;P1=499#&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38862</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 00:34:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokelinks</category>
		<category>campaigns</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<dc:creator>Yelling At Nothing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Logistical issues threaten to undermine Iraqi elections.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37770/Logistical%2Dissues%2Dthreaten%2Dto%2Dundermine%2DIraqi%2Delections</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/world/ny-woelec1208,0,4700439.story?coll=ny-worldnews-headlines"&gt;Logistical issues threaten to undermine Iraqi elections.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;&quot;I just can&apos;t see how we can hold these elections,&quot; an American consultant working with Iraqi election planners said on the condition of anonymity.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

I found out about this story, btw, from someone working on the elections in Baghdad. They write:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/world/ny-woelec1208,0,4700439.story?coll=ny-worldnews-headlines&quot;&gt;We&apos;ve got a leak&lt;/a&gt;. Someone, an American, is talking to the press. And ___ is *pissed*. It&apos;s a good article, though... er, even though I&apos;m not commenting on it. Or expressing an opinion. But if you&apos;ve got any interest in these elections, you should read it.&quot;
&lt;br&gt;They also cited several of the problems they are having: 
&lt;i&gt;&quot;Because our meal times are regulated by (KBR), it only allows us about five hours a day . . . with our Iraqi counterparts. Iraqis bolt for home at around 3 PM to avoid being shot in the head or blown up . . . After a mortar attack, car bomb, or any other security related exercise, the US military shuts down the Iraqna mobile phone network . . . We have become the focal point for . . . everything that the Iraqi staff cannot handle . . . which includes getting people (and) equipment into the building, getting water (and) lunch for day laborers, preventing mass resignations due to salary disputes, replacing windows broken by car bombs, removing trash, cleaning toilets, fixing locks, moving (and unpacking)  boxes . . . &lt;strong&gt;It makes it difficult to get our actual jobs done, although I have forgotten what those are.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37770</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:19:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>baghdad</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>insomnia_lj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>No schadenfreude in death</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35660/No%2Dschadenfreude%2Din%2Ddeath</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1305360,00.html"&gt;A decision has been made&lt;/a&gt; to attack Fallujah after the first Tuesday in November, after the election:  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=578&amp;e=3&amp;u=/nm/20040917/ts_nm/iraq_dc&quot;&gt;violent &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/usatoday/20040916/ts_usatoday/senatorsslamadministrationoniraq&amp;e=3&quot;&gt; political albatross&lt;/a&gt; of a secret &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/iraq/liberation.html&quot;&gt;Iraq&lt;/a&gt; with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&amp;storyID=585064&amp;section=news&quot;&gt;canceled elections&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35660</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 07:52:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>fallujah</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>four panels</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iraq: An Eyewitness Political Analysis &amp; A Political Nightmare</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30166/Iraq%2DAn%2DEyewitness%2DPolitical%2DAnalysis%2DA%2DPolitical%2DNightmare</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://h-net.msu.edu/cgi-bin/logbrowse.pl?trx=vx&amp;list=h-mideast-politics&amp;month=0312&amp;week=a&amp;msg=YBOTLovsCK1KbOC0MJGLyw&amp;user=&amp;pw=&quot; title=&quot;Amal Winter posts at H-Net a fascinating account of her recent 3-week trip to Iraq as part of a delegation of International Federation for Election Systems. She is an Arab-American intellectual, and her perspective is unique. She confirms our worst fears about how isolated the Coalition Provisional Authority is from the Iraqis it is supposed to be administering. She also has interesting comments on the US civilian contractors working in Iraq (she charges that they are running a racket with guaranteed profits, indemnified from risk). --Quote and both links via Juan Cole&quot;&gt;Buying up Iraq&lt;/a&gt;  and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/printable/?fact/031215fa_fact&quot; title=&quot;The Bush Administration has authorized a major escalation of the Special Forces covert war in Iraq. In interviews over the past month, American officials and former officials said that the main target was a hard-core group of Baathists who are believed to be behind much of the underground insurgency against the soldiers of the United States and its allies. A new Special Forces group, designated Task Force 121, has been assembled from Army Delta Force members, Navy seals, and C.I.A. paramilitary operatives, with many additional personnel ordered to report by January. Its highest priority is the neutralization of the Baathist insurgents, by capture or assassination. The revitalized Special Forces mission is a policy victory for Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who has struggled for two years to get the military leadership to accept the strategy of what he calls &apos;&apos;Manhunts&apos;&apos;--a phrase that he has used both publicly and in internal Pentagon communications.&quot;&gt;Moving Targets&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;sample paragraph from the first article:&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Trying to rebuild a country, when you are policing its civilians and fighting an escalating guerilla war, is a daunting task at best but the United States has boxed itself into an impossible position. Having justified its war on Iraq as measure that would bring liberation and Western-style democracy to Iraq, it needs Iraq to conduct elections as a fig-leaf to justify its occupation and allow it to step away from the impossible task of governing what may now have become an ungovernable country. And, the Bush Administration wants the Iraqi elections to be held before the American presidential ones. But, the Iraqi political scene contains several irresolvable contradictions.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;sample paragraph from the second article &lt;em&gt;(within)&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30166</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:16:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>rebuilding</category>
		<category>reconstruction</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20835/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/10/16/iraq.elections.ap/index.html"&gt;Saddam Hussein wins 100% of the vote&lt;/a&gt; in a hilarious display of so called democracy  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20835</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2002 02:38:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>saddamhussein</category>
		<dc:creator>JonnyX</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


