<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with elections and journalism</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/elections+journalism</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'elections' and 'journalism' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:13:21 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:13:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Going after Gore</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64404/Going%2Dafter%2DGore</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/10/gore200710"&gt;Going After Gore&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Al Gore couldn&apos;t believe his eyes: as the 2000 election heated up, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and other top news outlets kept going after him, with misquotes (&quot;I invented the Internet&quot;), distortions (that he lied about being the inspiration for Love Story), and strangely off-the-mark needling, while pundits such as Maureen Dowd appeared to be charmed by his rival, George W. Bush. For the first time, Gore and his family talk about the effect of the press attacks on his campaign&#8212;and about his future plans&#8212;to the author, who finds that many in the media are re-assessing their 2000 coverage.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64404</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:13:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>Criticism</category>
		<category>Elections</category>
		<category>Journalism</category>
		<category>Media</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<dc:creator>chunking express</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Polling Place Photo Project</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55987/Polling%2DPlace%2DPhoto%2DProject</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pollingplacephotoproject.org/"&gt;The Polling Place Photo Project&lt;/a&gt; is an experiment in citizen journalism that intends to collect photographs of every polling place in America next Tuesday.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55987</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 03:51:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>pollingplaces</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>coudal</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Emperor&apos;s New Hump</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39318/The%2DEmperors%2DNew%2DHump</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2012"&gt;The Emperor&apos;s New Hump&lt;/a&gt; In the weeks leading up to the November 2 election, the New York Times was abuzz with excitement. Besides the election itself, the paper&#8217;s reporters were hard at work on two hot investigative projects, each of which could have a major impact on the outcome of the tight presidential race.

One week before Election Day, the Times (10/25/04) ran a hard-hitting and controversial expos&amp;#0233; of the Al-Qaqaa ammunition dump&#8212;identified by U.N. inspectors before the war as containing 400 tons of special high-density explosives useful for aircraft bombings and as triggers for nuclear devices, but left unguarded and available to insurgents by U.S. forces after the invasion.

On Thursday, just three days after that first expos&amp;#0233;, the paper was set to run a second, perhaps more explosive piece, exposing how George W. Bush had worn an electronic cueing device in his ear and probably cheated during the presidential debates.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39318</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 06:52:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2004election</category>
		<category>alqaqaa</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bias at the NYT</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36164/Bias%2Dat%2Dthe%2DNYT</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/10/weekinreview/10bott.html?ex=1255147200&amp;amp;en=8293e0539de6d7a5&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland"&gt;Is &lt;em&gt;The New York Times&lt;/em&gt; biased?&lt;/a&gt; Dan Okrent, the NYT public editor, has gone through reams of campaign coverage and delivered his opinion. Make sure you read to the very end.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/34575&quot;&gt;Previously discussed here.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36164</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2004 09:13:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>danielokrent</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>essays</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>grrarrgh00</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dean Scream Redux</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31049/Dean%2DScream%2DRedux</link>
		<description> It has been said that reality is all about perspective -- a camera is a pinhole view of the world that frequently filters out much of the story. With that in mind, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.idiomstudio.com/&quot;&gt;check out this video of the familiar &quot;I have a scream&quot; speech by Dean&lt;/a&gt;. I&apos;m no Dean supporter, but from down in the trenches it doesn&apos;t look nearly as bad as it played on TV. Obviously the video you&apos;ve seen on the news has the best part  and the audience noise turned down, but from this vantage point, the speech almost seems appropriate for the crowd and the moment (but was still a lapse in judgement to forget cameras were rolling). I hope this isn&apos;t too subtle of a point -- forget all the politics involved -- this is a fascinating look at a familiar scene that was looped for the past week, but from an entirely different perspective and a different story emerges. [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://vidiot.typepad.com/telescreen/2004/01/a_different_per.html&quot;&gt;Vidiot&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31049</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:08:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>howarddean</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>scream</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20373/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/watchdog.html"&gt;The Truth Squad &lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/&quot;&gt;ABC News&lt;/a&gt; wants your help. Specifically, the ABCNEWS Political Unit Election Watchdog (PUEW), looking to keep upcoming elections as truthful as possible, wants you to gather up your election mail; take notes about the campaign-related phone calls you get; and send them your tips and credible accounts, so that they can go through them. They have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/watchdogdesc.html&quot;&gt;page of descriptions&lt;/a&gt; of what they are looking for. Are they expecting things to be particularly ugly? Are they &lt;em&gt;trying&lt;/em&gt; to dig something up, or is this really an attempt to neutralize election season lies?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20373</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:08:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abc</category>
		<category>abcnews</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>watchdogs</category>
		<dc:creator>mikhail</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4530/</link>
		<description> That dude that&apos;s been doing the Gore vs. Bush graphics for CNN has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/images/0011/top.bush.gore2.jpg&quot;&gt;outdone himself.&lt;/a&gt; It looks like Gore is actually trying to bite Bush&apos;s head... Egads!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4530</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2000 13:46:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>americanpolitics</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>cnn</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>gore</category>
		<category>graphics</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>Niccola Six</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


