MetaFilter posts tagged with elections and ralphnader

2–for–1 Voting

silusGROK — Wed, 05 May 2004 08:00:11 -0800

Electoral slight of hand is suggested by NYT columnist Bruce Ackerman in his opinion piece for May 5th, where he suggest that Nader choose Kerry's electoral slate when filing for the November election. It's a clever idea, and I'd be interested in seeing if it has any traction.

Nader running in 2004

XQUZYPHYR — Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:52:56 -0800

Ralph Nader announces 2004 presidential bid. Nader revealed on Meet the Press this morning (transcript here) that he will run as an independent candidate for the 2004 presidential race. (Follow-up from here and here)

Darth Nader

goethean — Fri, 19 Dec 2003 08:03:25 -0800

Ralph Nader wants your opinion on whether he should run in '04. Via TPM.

It begins.

XQUZYPHYR — Tue, 02 Dec 2003 21:53:26 -0800

Ralph Nader forms 2004 exploratory committee. As Josh Marshall notes, the web site appears empty but has most of its information hidden behind a blank index page, including the FAQ which, of course, addresses the... incident... in Florida.

Nader takes on the SEC, will a campaign be next?

StormBear — Tue, 04 Mar 2003 20:17:23 -0800

Nader takes on the SEC, will a campaign be next? Bit by bit, Ralph Nader does what he does best, annoying those who abuse power. This last year, he has kept with advocacy that is in parallel with smart campaign strategy and the creation of the SEC watchdog group is an example of that. The Greens are still debating him in the forums, wondering if he is still their guy. Maybe they should be asking if he's OUR guy?

Sean Meade — Wed, 22 Nov 2000 11:38:11 -0800

Looks like the end is in sight. And I'm glad. I'm so sick of the political rhetoric I could puke. I wish more people could address these issues with clear thinking, instead of defaulting to the rhetoric of the side they tend to favor. If anyone else says 'The American people want...' I will puke. Looks like Bush is going to win. Who cares? Nader is right: they've both been bought and sold. People who harp on 'the very clear policy differences' aren't making enough allowances for the other dynamics.

bkdelong — Tue, 14 Nov 2000 10:38:52 -0800

Nader wins!!! Well, sort of. An amusing story of hackers taking the election into their own hands....

johnb — Sun, 05 Nov 2000 07:41:52 -0800

Why the Democratic Party would rather lose this election -- Michael Albert clarifies the strategic implications of voting Nader: "Liberals talk and write as though the most important thing in captivity is their winning the election, or at least Bush not winning it. But at the top of their campaign, centrally important policies demonstrate that winning the election is not, in fact, their first priority. For them, priority one is serving the interests of their elite constituencies, and, just below that, of the Party itself...."

Also: hard-core Nader junkies should check out this vigorous (but quite long) rant: What every Republicrat should know (but is afraid to ask)

And, finally, a reason to join Greenpeace: new executive director John Passacantando takes a refreshingly sane, nonhysterical approach to Election 2000. Amen.

MattD — Thu, 02 Nov 2000 11:17:33 -0800

Nader Pro and Con (omnibus). The L.A. Weekly brings you about 20 prominent liberals' statements on whether they are voting Nader or Gore, and why ... captures pretty much all of the nuances in once place.

skallas — Wed, 01 Nov 2000 23:53:07 -0800

Jesse Ventura talks about his bid at Governership and voting your conscience. There's more than a little in common here between his campaign and Ralph's.

bkdelong — Tue, 31 Oct 2000 08:06:14 -0800

California shuts down Nader-Gore vote trading site. This is absolutely ridiculous. "William Wood, chief counsel for the office of the secretary of state, said yesterday morning that trading for anything valuable is illegal. "

skallas — Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:08:43 -0800

Great article on how Gore managed to shoot himself in the foot, over and over again and alienating potential voters during this election. (via greendot)

snakey — Sun, 22 Oct 2000 19:02:22 -0800

I just got polled for the presidential election . . .and they didn't even mention Nader's name as a choice for president! I had to tell them 'I am voting for Ralph Nader." Ralph is pulling 6% in recent national polls. This really gets me steamed that they don't include his name in the %#@*!! polls.

johnb — Sat, 21 Oct 2000 02:41:03 -0800

Hey Bay Area Nader fans -- get your tickets! (if you haven't already) -- 6:30 PM today at the Kaiser Arena in Oakland: the only California Super Rally, featuring Cornel West, Medea Benjamin, Danny Glover, Jello Biafra, Patti Smith, Tom Tomorrow, and other surprise guests! For those who can't make it there will be a Live Webcast available at votenader.org.

lagado — Mon, 09 Oct 2000 20:44:23 -0800

MetaFilter has already noted that Ralph Nader was prevented from debating Gush and Bore in the presidential debates hosted by the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD). Here is Nader's letter to the commission explaining the events and also making three demands that come due October 10...

harmful — Thu, 07 Sep 2000 13:08:03 -0800

Maybe Dubya needs a pinch-hitter to take his place opposite Gore at the debates planned by the Commission on Presidential Debates.

snakey — Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:52:14 -0800

Mastercard Wants to Silence Nader If you thought Ralph Nader's views on too much corporate power were too far out -- click this one. The corporate thugs are trying to shut him down.

ZachsMind — Sun, 06 Aug 2000 17:42:10 -0800

Well here's why Ralph is running. Do the other guys have anything this succinct and clear-cut? I can't find on the 'Net any page, nor have I heard in any of their speeches, where Bush or Gore come straight out and state exactly why they're running.

Annabel.Gill — Mon, 06 Mar 2000 12:52:44 -0800

He has more flair than Ralph Nader and he advocates lowering the voting age to five. How could you object to Jello Biafra for President?