<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with embedded</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/embedded</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'embedded' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:26:38 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:26:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>poppin in the rain</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39188/poppin%2Din%2Dthe%2Drain</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newstoday.com/vw-sing.php"&gt;singing in the rain,&lt;/a&gt; as interpreted by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.detoursvideo.com/Elsewhere.htm&quot;&gt;david &quot;elsewhere&quot; bernal&lt;/a&gt; . Also discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/31964&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39188</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:26:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>embedded</category>
		<category>movie</category>
		<category>nsfw-quicktime</category>
		<category>sound</category>
		<category>with</category>
		<dc:creator>ishmael</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Topobo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36001/Topobo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://web.media.mit.edu/~hayes/topobo/"&gt;Topobo&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;em&gt;Topobo is a 3D constructive assembly system embedded with kinetic memory, the ability to record and playback physical motion&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://web.media.mit.edu/~hayes/topobo/videos.html&quot;&gt;movies&lt;/a&gt;).
From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eyebeam.org/reblog/archives/2004/10/topobo.html&quot;&gt;Eyebeam&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36001</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2004 04:59:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>assembly</category>
		<category>embedded</category>
		<category>eyebeam</category>
		<category>motion</category>
		<category>topobo</category>
		<dc:creator>andrew cooke</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Journalistic Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25049/Journalistic%2DFreedom</link>
		<description> We all know that a number of journalists have &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.guardian.co.uk/broadcast/story/0,7493,934832,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Guardian Story&quot;&gt;quit the embedded roles&lt;/a&gt; they were playing. And while Saddam&apos;s regime may have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/11/opinion/11JORD.html?ex=1050638400&amp;en=ea21e8c88feae21c&amp;ei=5062&amp;partner=METAFILTER&quot; title=&quot;New York Times&quot;&gt;quite brutal&lt;/a&gt; to the press and others, some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/jour-a11.shtml&quot; title=&quot;World Socialist Web Site? Hadn&apos;t ever heard of them before...&quot;&gt;claim the recent loss&lt;/a&gt; of a few journalists was no accident.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25049</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:26:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>embedded</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>journalists</category>
		<dc:creator>woil</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Media Map of Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24888/Media%2DMap%2Dof%2DIraq</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://poynterextra.org/map/deploy.html"&gt;Media Map of Iraq&lt;/a&gt; (Requires Flash 6.)  Click on a location or unit to see a list of embedded reporters.  Then each reporter&apos;s name is a link to a list of their war reporting either at their website or via a Google News search.  Also, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.poynter.org/content/content_view.asp?id=27077&quot;&gt;Poynter.org is constantly looking to improve this map&lt;/a&gt; via reader input, as the Pentagon is not giving up much information on the embedment program.  Also, The Atlantic Monthly/Washington Post&apos;s Michael Kelly is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27396-2003Apr4.html&quot;&gt;first embedded reporter to be killed &lt;/a&gt;in this war.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24888</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 10:43:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>embedded</category>
		<category>flash</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>map</category>
		<category>Poynter</category>
		<category>reporters</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>pitchblende</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Are Embedded Journalists In Iraq Being Short-sheeted?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24535/Are%2DEmbedded%2DJournalists%2DIn%2DIraq%2DBeing%2DShortsheeted</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://mediapoint.press.net/services/media_features/livefeatures/war.html"&gt;Embedded?  Or In Bed With The Military Spin Doctors?&lt;/a&gt; Quite apart from the significant sexual and conspiratorial overtones of the word and concept themselves (when applied to people), there&apos;s something more than a little disquieting about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/kb/qualmeth.htm&quot;&gt;participant observation&lt;/a&gt; aspect of the large-scale practice of &lt;b&gt;embedded reporting&lt;/b&gt; in the current invasion of Iraq -  as opposed to the journalistic tradition of direct observation. Altogether too gung-ho - and inevitably so - I&apos;d say.  Me no like.  And don&apos;t really trust myself to be able to epistemologically introduce, in my understanding of what I see,  the (already minimal) distance that I&apos;d previously taken for granted in standard reportage. What can be done to offset this bias? [&lt;i&gt;Here is a very recent, detailed Department of Defense guide to what a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Feb2003/d20030228pag.pdf&quot;&gt;media embed&lt;/a&gt; consists of [&lt;small&gt;&lt;b&gt;pdf format&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/small&gt;] and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.journalism.org/resources/tools/ethics/wartime/embedding.asp&quot;&gt;release&lt;/a&gt; journalists must sign in order to be embedded&lt;/i&gt;.]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24535</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2003 12:46:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>embedded</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/641/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/typography/web/embedding/default.htm"&gt;Microsoft&apos;s font embedding demos&lt;/a&gt;  are really smurfin&apos; cool. I think my favorite is the &lt;a href=http://www.microsoft.com/typography/web/embedding/demos/6/demo6.htm?fname=%20&amp;fsize=&gt;Hotzone Journal&lt;/a&gt;. IE4+ needed. Has anybody seen embedded fonts used elsewhere, or does anybody know if Mozilla does/will support font embedding?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.641</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2000 23:27:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>browsers</category>
		<category>embedded</category>
		<category>embedding</category>
		<category>font</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>gleemax</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


