<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with employees and employers</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/employees+employers</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'employees' and 'employers' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2002 09:29:30 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2002 09:29:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21382/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A4911-2002Nov4.html"&gt;Are you using AOL IM at work?&lt;/a&gt; Chatting with your buds or SO while you should probably be working? Well, in a desperate attempt to turn some kind of profit, AOL is willing to sell your boss the ability to be in on the conversation, too.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21382</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2002 09:29:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>employees</category>
		<category>employers</category>
		<category>IM</category>
		<category>monitoring</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>workplaces</category>
		<dc:creator>crunchland</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19550/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-955289.html&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;One in four employees has a serious Web habit, spending more than one entire workday each week surfing non-work-related Web sites while at their desks. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Is this you? This is me &lt;i&gt;right now&lt;/i&gt;. Some days I&apos;m not sure how I still have a job. Does your employer try to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www1.surfwatch.com/&quot;&gt;control&lt;/a&gt; frivolous internet time? Does your boss &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peacefire.org/bypass/SurfWatch/&quot;&gt;still&lt;/a&gt; peek over your shoulder and find you looking at &quot;pr0n&quot;? &lt;br&gt;C&apos;mon, &apos;fess, up, tell us your stories...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19550</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:54:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>employees</category>
		<category>employers</category>
		<category>jobs</category>
		<category>surfing</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8727/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article/0,,3_794781,00.html"&gt;Monster.com parent buys HotJobs.&lt;/a&gt; TMP, the parent company of Monster.com, has acquired HotJobs for $460 million in stock.  Although they plan to maintain HotJobs as a &quot;stand-alone brand&quot; the jobs and resume databases will be merged.

I&apos;m really skeptical -- virtually everyone I know searched both Monster and HotJobs, and posted resumes on both places, so what are they really getting but duplication?  (HotJobs used to have a very distinctive approach -- no headhunters, in short -- but it had backed off of that recently.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8727</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2001 15:51:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>employees</category>
		<category>employers</category>
		<category>hotjobs</category>
		<category>jobs</category>
		<category>monster</category>
		<dc:creator>MattD</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8713/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/world/europe/story.jsp?story=78940"&gt;France&apos;s 35-hour work week&lt;/a&gt; has boosted the economy and proved a hit with both employees and their bosses. &quot;If the French experiment works then the UK Government may be forced to look at France rather than the U.S. for new ideas about reforming the jobs market.&quot; Thanks to &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://alternet.org/&quot;&gt;AlterNet&lt;/A&gt; for the link.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8713</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2001 08:39:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>35hourweek</category>
		<category>employees</category>
		<category>employers</category>
		<category>France</category>
		<category>French</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<category>workweek</category>
		<dc:creator>fleener</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


