<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with employees</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/employees</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'employees' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:43:45 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:43:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>I&apos;m Lovin&apos; It</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82035/Im%2DLovin%2DIt</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;&quot;It&apos;s true that McD&apos;s hiring process and training is essentially getting you to breathe on a mirror, and, if it fogs up, you&apos;re in... but that doesn&apos;t mean we&apos;re all bad.  Just that we&apos;re a mixed bag.  A lot of the time, McDonalds is the only place that will hire teenagers or immigrants, regardless of their skills, especially in todays climate.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://community.livejournal.com/mcdonalds_talk/&quot;&gt;McDonald&apos;s Talk&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;&quot;How the heck do you tell customers you can&apos;t take their trash through the window? I tried the health violation thing, but they don&apos;t seem to care. I usually say, we&apos;re not supposed to, and there&apos;s a trashcan around the corner (hard to see if you&apos;re in the drive-thru). I&apos;ve recently added on why we can&apos;t (health vio), as I just found out. Some chick got really uppity with me over it last week because I wouldn&apos;t throw her Hardee&apos;s crap out. Um, hello, honey, do I look like a trashcan (or a bank, for that matter)? I have problems with the cops who come through too (quote, &quot;Yeah, what am I gonna put in it?&quot;), who think they&apos;re damned special. Still, rules apply to them too. Anyway, ranting aside, original question, what&apos;s a good way to turn these folks down? I hardly seem rude when I tell them but they just don&apos;t get it, I guess. :/&quot;&lt;/em&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82035</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:43:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>complaints</category>
		<category>customers</category>
		<category>employees</category>
		<category>imlovinit</category>
		<category>livejournal</category>
		<category>mcdonalds</category>
		<category>rants</category>
		<category>talk</category>
		<category>youdeserveabreaktoday</category>
		<dc:creator>netbros</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21382/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A4911-2002Nov4.html"&gt;Are you using AOL IM at work?&lt;/a&gt; Chatting with your buds or SO while you should probably be working? Well, in a desperate attempt to turn some kind of profit, AOL is willing to sell your boss the ability to be in on the conversation, too.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21382</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2002 09:29:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>employees</category>
		<category>employers</category>
		<category>IM</category>
		<category>monitoring</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>workplaces</category>
		<dc:creator>crunchland</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19550/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-955289.html&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;One in four employees has a serious Web habit, spending more than one entire workday each week surfing non-work-related Web sites while at their desks. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Is this you? This is me &lt;i&gt;right now&lt;/i&gt;. Some days I&apos;m not sure how I still have a job. Does your employer try to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www1.surfwatch.com/&quot;&gt;control&lt;/a&gt; frivolous internet time? Does your boss &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peacefire.org/bypass/SurfWatch/&quot;&gt;still&lt;/a&gt; peek over your shoulder and find you looking at &quot;pr0n&quot;? &lt;br&gt;C&apos;mon, &apos;fess, up, tell us your stories...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19550</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:54:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>employees</category>
		<category>employers</category>
		<category>jobs</category>
		<category>surfing</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19155/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/7/26627.html"&gt;All your Ideas&lt;/a&gt; are belong to US.  What happens when you agree that your inventions belong to your employer, even when you aren&apos;t done inventing them yet?  Why, they sue you!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19155</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:30:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Alcatel</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>employees</category>
		<category>ideas</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<dc:creator>dwivian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15847/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1895000/1895102.stm"&gt;&quot;We&apos;re looking at this as something fun for them to do while they&apos;re looking for another job&quot;.&lt;/a&gt; Playboy is looking for women staff from the collapsed US energy giant Enron to pose for a special issue of the magazine. Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geocities.com/falameufilho&quot;&gt;RTFM (weblog, in portuguese)&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15847</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2002 08:41:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>employees</category>
		<category>Enron</category>
		<category>Playboy</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>rexgregbr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14145/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.badattitudes.com/UnionSpy.html"&gt;George Bush: Union buster.&lt;/a&gt; 500 federal employees (including US Attorneys&apos; offices, Interpol&apos;s U.S. branch, the Criminal Division, the National Drug Intelligence Center, and the Office of Intelligence Policy and Review) fired because the presence of unionized workers would not be &quot;consistent with national security requirements and considerations.&quot; [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://boingboing.net/&quot; title=&quot;best damn weblog: now more than ever.&quot;&gt;bb&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14145</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2002 22:06:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>employees</category>
		<category>employment</category>
		<category>federal</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>union</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12709/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fuckedcompany.com/printcafe.html"&gt;PrintCafe sues idiot.&lt;/a&gt; Literally.  They are suing several individuals who posted anonymous comments on F---edCompany&apos;s message boards.  So far, all they have are the aliases the comments were posted under, namely &quot;Ex-DLJ&quot;, &quot;sucky-me&quot;, and &quot;idiot!&quot;.  Apparently that&apos;s all they&apos;re going to get, since Pud says &lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.fuckedcompany.com/fc/phparchives/search.php?search=printcafe&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;FC servers contain no logs
&quot;.  Also of note is item number 4 on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fuckedcompany.com/extras/view.cfm?image=printcafe4.jpg&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt; of the letter Pud received.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12709</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2001 22:29:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anonymity</category>
		<category>employees</category>
		<category>FuckedCompany</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>internetlaw</category>
		<category>libel</category>
		<category>PrintCafe</category>
		<category>serverlogs</category>
		<category>slander</category>
		<category>whistleblowing</category>
		<dc:creator>Potsy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8727/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article/0,,3_794781,00.html"&gt;Monster.com parent buys HotJobs.&lt;/a&gt; TMP, the parent company of Monster.com, has acquired HotJobs for $460 million in stock.  Although they plan to maintain HotJobs as a &quot;stand-alone brand&quot; the jobs and resume databases will be merged.

I&apos;m really skeptical -- virtually everyone I know searched both Monster and HotJobs, and posted resumes on both places, so what are they really getting but duplication?  (HotJobs used to have a very distinctive approach -- no headhunters, in short -- but it had backed off of that recently.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8727</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2001 15:51:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>employees</category>
		<category>employers</category>
		<category>hotjobs</category>
		<category>jobs</category>
		<category>monster</category>
		<dc:creator>MattD</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8713/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/world/europe/story.jsp?story=78940"&gt;France&apos;s 35-hour work week&lt;/a&gt; has boosted the economy and proved a hit with both employees and their bosses. &quot;If the French experiment works then the UK Government may be forced to look at France rather than the U.S. for new ideas about reforming the jobs market.&quot; Thanks to &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://alternet.org/&quot;&gt;AlterNet&lt;/A&gt; for the link.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8713</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2001 08:39:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>35hourweek</category>
		<category>employees</category>
		<category>employers</category>
		<category>France</category>
		<category>French</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<category>workweek</category>
		<dc:creator>fleener</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2033/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://partners.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/06/biztech/articles/08salon.html"&gt;Two of the Salon staffers fired this week&lt;/a&gt; were the founders of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/mwt&quot;&gt;Mothers Who Think&lt;/a&gt; section. Chalk one up for the other mothers.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2033</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2000 09:29:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>employees</category>
		<category>employment</category>
		<category>firing</category>
		<category>motherswhothink</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<dc:creator>rcade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


