<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with energy and Bush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/energy+Bush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'energy' and 'Bush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:57:13 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:57:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Gimme that list!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27056/Gimme%2Dthat%2Dlist</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29486-2003Jul8.html?nav=hptoc_p"&gt;The other shoe is dropping&lt;/a&gt; for the Bush administration. Yes it&apos;s old news, but relevant to recent events. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wmbb.com/frontpage/MGBXFV2I4ID.html&quot;&gt;Cheney&lt;/a&gt; ordered to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/0703/11energy.html&quot;&gt;name&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sierraclub.org/scoop/071503.asp&quot;&gt;members &lt;/a&gt;of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0709cheney09.html&quot;&gt;energy panel&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/business/1998472&quot;&gt;Ken Lay&lt;/a&gt;, pack your bags!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27056</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:57:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanPolitics</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Cheney</category>
		<category>DickCheney</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>Enron</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>KenLay</category>
		<category>scandals</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>CrazyJub</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The State of the Energy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23146/The%2DState%2Dof%2Dthe%2DEnergy</link>
		<description> The State of the Energy: Ahead of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fuelcelltoday.com/FuelCellToday/IndustryInformation/IndustryInformationExternal/NewsDisplayArticle/0,1471,2420,00.html&quot;&gt;rumors&lt;/a&gt; Bush is set to propose a hydrogen fuel plan, fuel cell producer stocks &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/markets/commodities/newswire/2003/01/28/rtr861644.html&quot;&gt;jump&lt;/a&gt;. In the event of an Iraqi war, the oil fields there will be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.military.com/NewsContent?file=FL_oil_012503&quot;&gt;siezed&lt;/a&gt; to prevent their drestruction and Colin Powell says the US will hold them &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/nm/20030122/ts_nm/iraq_oil_powell_dc_3&quot;&gt;in trust&lt;/a&gt;&quot;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23146</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:06:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>raaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16638/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/nyt/20020425/wl_nyt/saudi_to_warn_bush_of_rupture_over_israel_policy&amp;amp;printer=1"&gt;The Saudis are about to deliver an ultimatum to Bush&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;In a bleak assessment, he [Prince Abdullah] said there was talk within the Saudi royal family and in Arab capitals of using the &quot;oil weapon&quot; against the United States, and demanding that the United States leave strategic military bases in the region. Such measures, he said, would be a &quot;strategic debacle for the United States.&quot; &lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;How should Bush respond?&lt;/b&gt;

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16638</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:02:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>internationalrelations</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>PrinceAbdullah</category>
		<category>SaudiArabia</category>
		<dc:creator>Rastafari</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8535/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.democrats.org/news/quotes/recent.html"&gt;This White House will Have a Long Memory.....&lt;/a&gt;    &quot;To join the coalition, you must agree to support the Bush energy proposal in its entirety and not to
     lobby for changes to the bill... Should the bill change, you must support the changes in the
     legislation or drop out of the coalition. If you are caught attempting to lobby behind the back of the
     White House, you will be expelled from the coalition. I have been advised that this White House
     &apos;will have a long memory.&apos;&quot; -- Fundraising memo for the Alliance for Energy and Economic
       Growth, a month-old trade group consisting of representatives from the various energy
         industries. The letter puts the admission to the group at &quot;a very low price&quot; of $5,000.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8535</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:33:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bill</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>Republican</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>brucec</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7764/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://channel.nytimes.com/2001/05/17/politics/17CND-POWER.html"&gt;Bush&apos;s energy plan.&lt;/a&gt; We knew it was coming.  Arguing the United States &quot;faces the most serious energy shortage since the oil embargoes of the 1970&apos;s,&quot; Bush proposes the expansion of drilling, a new commitment to nuclear power, and a review of vehicle mileage standards.  If you really want to dig--er, I mean drill--into it, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/energy/&quot;&gt;proposal is available on the White House website&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7764</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2001 11:22:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<dc:creator>mrbula</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7490/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/134292670_power06.html"&gt;Bush Admin., Scientists at odds over power issues.&lt;/a&gt; I&apos;ve been trying to give the President a chance, but it seems as though conservation efforts and alternative evergy sources are being completely ignored. Mere difference of opinion-or something else?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7490</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2001 11:02:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>black8</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


