<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with energy and coal</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/energy+coal</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'energy' and 'coal' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:05:33 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:05:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Yesterday&apos;s Energy of Tomorrow...and more</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/83615/Yesterdays%2DEnergy%2Dof%2DTomorrowand%2Dmore</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.greentechhistory.com/2009/07/1925-forecast-gasoline-depletion-within-10-20-years/"&gt;Peak Oil, 1925.&lt;/a&gt; In 2000, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greentechhistory.com/2009/07/1975-20-of-new-buildings-in-2000-will-be-solar-equipped/&quot;&gt;20% of new buildings will be solar equipped.&lt;/a&gt; By the late 1990s, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greentechhistory.com/2009/07/1971-forecast-nuclear-will-provide-60-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-late-90s/&quot;&gt;90% of the world&apos;s energy will be nuclear-generated&lt;/a&gt;. These and other erroneous projections are being collected as part of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greentechhistory.com/tag/forecastproject/&quot;&gt;Forecast Project&lt;/a&gt; on the website &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greentechhistory.com/&quot;&gt;Inventing Green: The Lost History of Alternative Energy in America&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.83615</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:05:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>coal</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>futurism</category>
		<category>gas</category>
		<category>green</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>peakoil</category>
		<category>predictions</category>
		<category>solar</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>wind</category>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>China coal powerplant myths debunked</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75519/China%2Dcoal%2Dpowerplant%2Dmyths%2Ddebunked</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2008/china-energy-1006.html&quot;&gt;MIT report debunks China energy myth.&lt;/a&gt; A detailed analysis of powerplants in China by MIT researchers debunks the widespread notion that outmoded energy technology or the utter absence of government regulation is to blame for that country&apos;s notorious air-pollution problems. &lt;blockquote&gt;China&apos;s power sector has been expanding at a rate roughly equivalent to three to four new coal-fired, 500 megawatt plants coming on line every week.. most of the new plants have been built to very high technical standards, using some of the most modern technologies available.. [but] market pressures encourage plant managers to buy the cheapest, lowest quality and most-polluting coal available, while at the same time idle expensive-to-operate smokestack scrubbers or other cleanup technologies.. &quot;the kinds of technology currently being adopted in China are not cheap. They&apos;re not buying junk, and in some cases the plants are employing state-of-the-art technology.&quot; The Chinese state has substantially improved its ability to implement and enforce rules on technology standards. It has been slower, however, to develop such abilities for monitoring the day-to-day operations of energy producers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Part of the continuing story of Chinese lack of oversight plaguing the food industry, lead in toys, etc.. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75519</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:44:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>china</category>
		<category>coal</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Coal.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73590/Coal</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71kckb8hhOQ"&gt;Coal.&lt;/a&gt; Cheap, Abundant, Clean.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73590</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:51:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>coal</category>
		<category>comedy</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>fun</category>
		<category>lol</category>
		<category>newyork</category>
		<category>nyc</category>
		<category>parody</category>
		<category>power</category>
		<category>slyt</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<category>youtube</category>
		<dc:creator>brownpau</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Down The Mine</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63943/Down%2DThe%2DMine</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.george-orwell.org/Down_The_Mine/0.html"&gt;Down The Mine.&lt;/a&gt; An essay on &lt;a href=http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=11254947&gt;coal&lt;/a&gt; mining &lt;a href=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-feldman/coal-mining-as-seen-by-ge_b_60957.html&gt;as seen by George Orwell&lt;/a&gt; in 1937.  &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/&gt;The Huffington Post&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63943</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:50:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Coal</category>
		<category>Energy</category>
		<category>History</category>
		<category>Industry</category>
		<category>Literature</category>
		<category>Mining</category>
		<category>Orwell</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Peak Coal?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62334/Peak%2DCoal</link>
		<description> Is the USA the Saudi Arabia of Coal? Not so fast! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/21/business/21coal.html?_r=1&amp;ref=science&amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;It appears that US coal reserves have been grossly overstated.&lt;/a&gt; (See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://dels.nas.edu/dels/rpt_briefs/coal_r&amp;d_final.pdf&quot;&gt;this report&lt;/a&gt; in PDF format.) Does this mean &lt;a href=&quot;http://europe.theoildrum.com/node/2396&quot;&gt;we&apos;ve already hit peak coal &lt;/a&gt;in the lower 48? How does this change the plans of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futurecoalfuels.org/&quot;&gt;those who want to use CTL &lt;/a&gt;to ease our dependence on foreign oil.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62334</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 22:40:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>coal</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<dc:creator>Crotalus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>US Energy Flows</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58698/US%2DEnergy%2DFlows</link>
		<description> Lawrence Livermore National Lab produces &lt;a href=&quot;http://eed.llnl.gov/flow/02flow.php&quot;&gt;fascinating charts of energy flow in the US&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://eed.llnl.gov/flow/&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;).  More energy use statisitics can be found at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eia.doe.gov/&quot;&gt;Energy Information Administration&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58698</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:12:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>co2</category>
		<category>coal</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>energyflow</category>
		<category>llnl</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>statistics</category>
		<category>water</category>
		<dc:creator>pombe</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Big OilCoal. The other black fossil fuel.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52533/Big%2DOilCoal%2DThe%2Dother%2Dblack%2Dfossil%2Dfuel</link>
		<description> The average American uses &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/25/books/review/25powell.html&quot;&gt;20 pounds of coal a day&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;our shiny white iPod economy is propped up by dirty black rocks.. I see more people dying of particle air pollution than are dying of AIDS.&quot; Coal accounts for nearly 40 percent of America&apos;s carbon dioxide emissions. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0618319409/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Big Coal&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; by Jeff Goodell.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52533</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 21:02:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>carbon</category>
		<category>coal</category>
		<category>dioxide</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>global</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>warming</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>So, umm.....about that oil in Iraq....</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28518/So%2Dummabout%2Dthat%2Doil%2Din%2DIraq</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://wvhc.drw.net/VoiceSept01/WindCheaper.VS.Sept01Voice.htm"&gt;Wind Power cheaper than coal,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://nytimes.com/2003/09/19/automobiles/19ELEC.html&quot;&gt;electric car does 0 to 60 in 3.7 w/300 mile cruising range&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&apos;s official: wind power is now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globaltechnoscan.com/29Aug-4thSep01/wind_power.htm&quot;&gt;cheaper&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/news/cache/ReutersOnlineScience/08_23_2001.romta1537-story-bcscienceenergywinddc.html&quot;&gt; than&lt;/a&gt; electricity from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/health_and_environment/page.cfm?pageID=88&quot;&gt;Coal&lt;/a&gt;, Stanford Researchers report in a study published in the Journal &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencemag.org/&quot;&gt;Science&lt;/a&gt;. Quiz for Metafilter science wonks: how much of current US energy consumption could be supplied by spending 200 billion dollars on wind turbines?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    

Meanwhile...Powered by 6800 lithium-ion batteries, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acpropulsion.com/tzero_pages/tzero_home.htm&quot;&gt;Tzero&lt;/a&gt; &quot;from zero to 100 and through the quarter mile, will run with, or beat, the $281,000 Lamborghini Murci  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28518</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2003 06:53:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>coal</category>
		<category>electricity</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>power</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>turbines</category>
		<category>tzero</category>
		<category>windpower</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


