<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with energy and pollution</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/energy+pollution</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'energy' and 'pollution' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:12:07 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:12:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Project Porchlight</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47324/Project%2DPorchlight</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.onechange.org/"&gt;Project Porchlight&lt;/a&gt; [via &lt;a href=&apos;http://projects.metafilter.com/votes/82&apos;&gt;mefi projects&lt;/a&gt;] is a volunteer-based, not-for-profit group that aims to deliver one free energy-saving compact fluorescent light bulb to every household in Canada. If successful, the resulting reduction in pollution from energy saved will be the equivalent of taking 66,000 cars off the road.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47324</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:12:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>lightbulbs</category>
		<category>mefiprojects</category>
		<category>pollution</category>
		<dc:creator>Robot Johnny</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Can&apos;t you hear me knocking...&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43520/Cant%2Dyou%2Dhear%2Dme%2Dknocking</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=939436&amp;amp;CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312"&gt;US energy bill is held up&lt;/a&gt; by a pro-MTBE provision that bipartisan Senators promised they would not sign into law. Nervous &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.epa.gov/mtbe/&quot;&gt;MTBE&lt;/a&gt; manufacturers, in an effort to divest themselves of potential asbestos-like liability lawsuits, have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nybooks.com/articles/18075&quot;&gt;donating millions&lt;/a&gt; in campaign contributions to the cause, despite peer-reviewed research pointing to &lt;a href=&quot;http://tsrtp.ucdavis.edu/mtberpt/&quot;&gt;lingering questions&lt;/a&gt; about &lt;a href=&quot;http://tsrtp.ucdavis.edu/mtberpt/vol2.pdf&quot;&gt;safety&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) and &lt;a href=&quot;http://tsrtp.ucdavis.edu/mtberpt/vol5_7.pdf&quot;&gt;utility&lt;/a&gt; (PDF).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43520</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:55:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>EPA</category>
		<category>gasoline</category>
		<category>MTBE</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>pollution</category>
		<category>softmoney</category>
		<category>water</category>
		<dc:creator>Rothko</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Solar Tower, someday...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39929/Solar%2DTower%2Dsomeday</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.solarmissiontechnologies.com/project.htm"&gt;The kilometer-high Solar Tower&lt;/a&gt; to be built in Australian outback (&lt;a href=http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/22685&gt;previous post&lt;/a&gt;) has finally &lt;a href=http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,66694,00.html&gt;purchased a site&lt;/a&gt;, and construction may be &lt;a href=http://alt-e.blogspot.com/2005/02/site-agreed-for-australian-solar-tower.html&gt;finished in 2009&lt;/a&gt;.  Other towers may be built in &lt;a href=http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/FJ07Ad03.html&gt;China&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=http://www.solarmissiontechnologies.com/publications/VictorvilleDailyPress-10-12-03.htm&gt;the US&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39929</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:24:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>pollution</category>
		<category>solar</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20594/</link>
		<description> As the Alberta government ratchets up &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gov.ab.ca/home/kyoto/Display.cfm?id=7&quot;&gt;its campaign against the Kyoto Protocol&lt;/a&gt; (and the Canadian government&apos;s support thereof), two environmental groups release a report that argues that &lt;a href=&quot;http://cbc.ca/storyview/CBC/2002/10/02/kyoto_suzuki021002&quot;&gt;Canadians could cut greenhouse gas emissions by 50 per cent&lt;/a&gt; and save $30 billion a year in the process by 2030 (PDFs of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davidsuzuki.org/files/16pager.pdf&quot;&gt;report summary&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davidsuzuki.org/files/Kyoto_Beyond_LR.pdf&quot;&gt;full report&lt;/a&gt;). And, if reducing emissions starts at home, you can apparently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/printarticle/gam/20021005/FOCKYOT&quot;&gt;cut your own energy bills and emissions in half&lt;/a&gt; simply by stopping leaks and drafts in your house.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20594</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2002 11:19:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alberta</category>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>drafts</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>globalwarming</category>
		<category>homeinsulation</category>
		<category>kyotoprotocol</category>
		<category>pollution</category>
		<dc:creator>mcwetboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3348/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.clickforcleanair.org "&gt;Click for Clean Air.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Canada argues that clearcutting our old-growth forests and replanting them, and building nuclear reactors in developing countries, is more effective than reducing fossil-fuel pollution. It also wants to buy &quot;pollution rights&quot; from countries like Russia that are burning less fossil fuel because their economies have collapsed.&quot;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Not that Canada&apos;s alone in the above, and not that the solution is a click away, but you have to start somewhere. For those of you who aren&apos;t Canadian, David Suzuki is a respected scientist and public figure who&apos;s been worth listening to since...since...forever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
If you&apos;re not Canadian, you can still participate.....  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3348</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2000 16:57:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Canada</category>
		<category>DavidSuzuki</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>fossilfuels</category>
		<category>pollution</category>
		<dc:creator>ajh</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


