<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with ethics and stemcells</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/ethics+stemcells</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'ethics' and 'stemcells' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:04:08 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:04:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Stem Cells - Rumor vs. Reality</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43069/Stem%2DCells%2DRumor%2Dvs%2DReality</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8303756/"&gt;Stem cell pioneer does a reality check&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43069</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:04:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>morality</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>stemcells</category>
		<dc:creator>daksya</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Stem cell research guidelines</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41711/Stem%2Dcell%2Dresearch%2Dguidelines</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nas.edu/"&gt;The National Academies&lt;/a&gt; have finally released suggested &lt;a href=http://books.nap.edu/catalog/11278.html&gt;guidelines&lt;/a&gt; for &lt;a href=http://www4.nationalacademies.org/news.nsf/isbn/0309096537?OpenDocument&gt;research&lt;/a&gt; with &lt;a href=http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&amp;name=ViewWeb&amp;articleId=9623&gt;embryonic stem cells&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=http://wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,67395,00.html&gt;chimeras&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=http://e-sheep.com/turkey/00.html&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41711</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 10:14:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bioethics</category>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>chimeras</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>stemcells</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Real Deal on Stem Cells</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36493/The%2DReal%2DDeal%2Don%2DStem%2DCells</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.csntv.org/events/StemCellSymposium"&gt;Stem Cells: Science, Ethics and Politics at the Crossroads&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36493</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:31:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>stemcells</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Stem Cell Research</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33402/Stem%2DCell%2DResearch</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101040531-641157,00.html"&gt;The False Controversy of Stem Cell Research.&lt;/a&gt; Kinsley: In fact, thinking it through is a moral obligation, especially if you are on the side of the argument that wants to stop or slow this research.

It&apos;s not complicated. An embryo used in stem-cell research (and fertility treatments) is three to five days past conception. It consists of a few dozen cells that together are too small to be seen without a microscope. It has no consciousness, no self-awareness, no ability to feel love or pain. The smallest insect is far more human in every respect except potential.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33402</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 10:17:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>embryo</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>MichaelKinsley</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>stemcells</category>
		<category>Time</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Examining Bush&apos;s stem cell policy, two years later.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29169/Examining%2DBushs%2Dstem%2Dcell%2Dpolicy%2Dtwo%2Dyears%2Dlater</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9348-2003Oct23.html"&gt;Examining Bush&apos;s stem cell policy, two years later.&lt;/a&gt; Kinsley: Put it all together, and the stem cells that can squeeze through Bush&apos;s loopholes are far less promising than they seemed two years ago, while the general promise of embryonic stem cells burns brighter than ever. If you claim to have made an anguished moral decision, and the factual basis for that decision turns out to be faulty, you ought to reconsider or your claim to moral anguish looks phony. But Bush&apos;s moral anguish was suspect from the beginning, because the policy it produced makes no sense.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29169</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2003 19:52:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>EmbryonicStemCells</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>morality</category>
		<category>stemcells</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


