<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with evolution and future</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/evolution+future</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'evolution' and 'future' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:00:48 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:00:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>transcendental numbers rumble in the technium</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85206/transcendental%2Dnumbers%2Drumble%2Din%2Dthe%2Dtechnium</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2009/08/extropy.php"&gt;Extropy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;How did life arise? What is information? In his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2009/08/ratcheting_up_a.php&quot;&gt;recent&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2009/08/the_most_powerf.php&quot;&gt;dispatches&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/&quot;&gt;The Technium&lt;/a&gt;, Kevin Kelly would say &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extropy&quot;&gt;extropy&lt;/a&gt; (cf. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/42283/keep-your-science-off-my-children#941341&quot;&gt;negentropy&lt;/a&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/notebooks/prigogine.html&quot;&gt;Prigogine&lt;/a&gt;). [previously &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/46889/This-so-called-reality&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;|&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/67167/314159265itwasthebestoftimesitwastheworstofti&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85206</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:00:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>artifical</category>
		<category>computation</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>epistemology</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>extropy</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>HumanEvolution</category>
		<category>humanism</category>
		<category>humanity</category>
		<category>humans</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>life</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>reality</category>
		<category>simulation</category>
		<category>singularity</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>transhumanism</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Evolution and intellect</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82557/Evolution%2Dand%2Dintellect</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200907/intelligence"&gt;On hive minds,&lt;/a&gt; &#8220;cognitive calisthenics&#8221;, &#8220;You+&#8221;.  Cascio predicts that in the near future &#8220;many more humans will have the capacity to do something that was once limited to a hermetic priesthood&#8221;.

Get Smart, by Jamais Cascio, the Atlantic, July/August 2009  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82557</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:20:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>hivemind</category>
		<category>youplus</category>
		<dc:creator>mareli</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>whither or wither?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79188/whither%2Dor%2Dwither</link>
		<description> What is the future of capitalism?&lt;br&gt;
a) &lt;a href=&quot;http://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2009/02/coming-soon-to-a-theater-near-you-capitalism-30.html&quot;&gt;3.0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
b) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsweek.com/id/183670&quot;&gt;Canada&lt;/a&gt;* (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1855317,00.html&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/15/AR2008101503321_pf.html&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
c) &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/haque/2009/01/davos_discussing_a_depression.html &quot;&gt;smart growth&lt;/a&gt;&apos; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/haque/2009/02/constructive_capitalism.html&quot; title=&quot;starts off slow and boring -- he sez &apos;&apos;right&apos;&apos; more than clay shirky -- and pretty much continues that way :P but! i think patience is eventually rewarded (he&apos;s, coincidentally, a bit more engaging when he stops saying &apos;&apos;right&apos;&apos; _all the time_)&quot;&gt;viz&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;br&gt;
d) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.interfluidity.com/posts/1233118501.shtml&quot; title=&quot;if you want to skip the macro-ese, just read the last few paragraphs in the post (but _avoid_ the comments! ;)&quot;&gt;none of the above&lt;/a&gt;** *cf. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondrag%C3%B3n_Cooperative_Corporation&quot;&gt;Spain&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e080a31c-d067-11dc-9309-0000779fd2ac.html&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122627447630612005.html&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;)
**cf. &lt;a href=&quot;http://bactra.org/weblog/algae-2009-01.html&quot;&gt;trust networks&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79188</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:41:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>capitalism</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>futurism</category>
		<category>globalization</category>
		<category>institutions</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Simulacrisation of Technology into Life</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50098/The%2DSimulacrisation%2Dof%2DTechnology%2Dinto%2DLife</link>
		<description> As the Pentagon ousts plans to turn &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4808342.stm&quot;&gt;insects into cyber war machines&lt;/a&gt; you&apos;d be forgiven for asking the question: Where does the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/4472491.stm&quot;&gt;real digital end&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/14/0354241&quot;&gt;faked life begin?&lt;/a&gt; Are we &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4378162.stm&quot;&gt;simulating life synthetically&lt;/a&gt;? or just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.accelerationwatch.com/spiral.html&quot;&gt;speeding up&lt;/a&gt; an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0642.html&quot;&gt;entirely natural process&lt;/a&gt;? Technologically engineered life is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kurzweilai.net/news/frame.html?main=news_single.html?id%3D5371&quot;&gt;here to stay&lt;/a&gt;. Its not far fetched to &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spime&quot;&gt;speculate&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/simulacra&quot;&gt;simulacra&lt;/a&gt; may become all there is.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50098</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:09:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ai</category>
		<category>cosmos</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>human</category>
		<category>life</category>
		<category>nano</category>
		<category>nature</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>reality</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>simulacra</category>
		<category>simulacrum</category>
		<category>singularity</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>transhuman</category>
		<category>universe</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>weird</category>
		<dc:creator>0bvious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The concept of the Transhuman: human, the self, consciousness and their effects on the law</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47580/The%2Dconcept%2Dof%2Dthe%2DTranshuman%2Dhuman%2Dthe%2Dself%2Dconsciousness%2Dand%2Dtheir%2Deffects%2Don%2Dthe%2Dlaw</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.transhumanlaw.org/index.html"&gt;The first Transhuman Conference On the Law of Transhuman Persons:&lt;/a&gt; Whether or not you believe humans are set to evolve into gods, or AI is destined to achieve &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.transhumanist.com/volume1/moravec.htm&quot;&gt;self-awareness&lt;/a&gt; the idea of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhuman&quot;&gt;Transhuman&lt;/a&gt; is a thought provoking concept. Philosophers have debated &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.philosophy.ucf.edu/texts.html&quot;&gt;the nature of the self&lt;/a&gt;, of the human for millennia. Is it time to start drafting new laws to govern &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; possible sentient beings on this planet? or is it all just a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibiblio.org/jstrout/uploading/MUHomePage.html&quot;&gt;science&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=505&quot;&gt;fiction&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.granta.com/books/chapters/979&quot;&gt;a comfortable  humanist illusion&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47580</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:43:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ai</category>
		<category>awareness</category>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>existence</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>human</category>
		<category>humanism</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>reference</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>scifi sf</category>
		<category>self</category>
		<category>sf</category>
		<category>singularity</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>transhuman</category>
		<category>weird</category>
		<dc:creator>0bvious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What Comes Next?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39485/What%2DComes%2DNext</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/feature/story/0,13026,1409019,00.html"&gt;What Comes Next?&lt;/a&gt; Big scientists answer some big questions: apparently Elvis may still be alive in a parallel universe.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39485</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:46:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Evolution continues</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22596/Evolution%2Dcontinues</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://animal.discovery.com/convergence/futureiswild/futureiswild.html"&gt;Evolution is a process&lt;/a&gt; that hasn&apos;t stopped just because humans now rule the planet. What will animals look like in 200,000 years? The Discovery Channel&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://animal.discovery.com/&quot;&gt;Animal Planet&lt;/a&gt; asks experts to predict the future of life on Earth.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22596</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2002 14:52:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AnimalPlanet</category>
		<category>animals</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>DiscoveryChannel</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>hipnerd</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14435/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,644002,00.html"&gt;&apos;If you want to know what Utopia is like, just look around - this is it,&apos;&lt;/a&gt; the article asks is human evolution over? Two interesting &quot;facts?&quot; &quot;points?&quot;

1) the blending of our genes which will soon produce a uniformly brown-skinned population. Apart from that, there will be little change in the species. 

2) Just consider Aids, and then look at chimpanzees,&apos; says Jones. &apos;You find they all carry a version of HIV but are unaffected by it. Something very similar could soon happen to humans. In a thousand years...

Link via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cursor.org&quot;&gt;www.cursor.org&lt;/a&gt;.

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14435</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 06:03:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cursor</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>genetics</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>humans</category>
		<dc:creator>bittennails</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2007/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.feedmag.com/dna/wildfall.html"&gt;Human Evolution&lt;/a&gt; Will the next significant steps be biological, technical or both?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2007</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2000 20:36:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>HumanEvolution</category>
		<category>humanity</category>
		<category>humans</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>PaperCut</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1058/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html"&gt;Why the Future Doesn&apos;t Need Us&lt;/a&gt; is the cover story in this month&apos;s &apos;Wired&apos;. It was written by Bill Joy, chief scientist at Sun. In it he makes a very convincing case for strict regulation of genetics, nanotech, and robotics, given that any of these could cause the extinction of the human species in the next 30 years. What do you think?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1058</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:43:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>billjoy</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>genetics</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>wired</category>
		<dc:creator>Sean Meade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


