<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with evolution and research</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/evolution+research</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'evolution' and 'research' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:33:42 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:33:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>you say you want an evolution</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73522/you%2Dsay%2Dyou%2Dwant%2Dan%2Devolution</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/15/science/15wils.html"&gt;EO Wilson&lt;/a&gt; believes in &lt;strike&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/15/lets-get-rid-of-darwinism/&quot;&gt;Darwinism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.howardbloom.net/Beyond_The_Supercomputer.htm&quot;&gt;group&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://howardbloom.net/instant_evolution.htm&quot;&gt;selection&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edge.org/q2008/q08_14.html#wilsonds&quot;&gt;evolution as a multi-level process&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/67834/Should-I-post-this#1966941&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; that can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-07/plos-nsm071508.php&quot;&gt;evolve adaptations&lt;/a&gt; above the level of &lt;a href=&quot;http://games.slashdot.org/games/08/07/16/1753252.shtml&quot;&gt;individual organisms&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73522</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:33:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>More Beautiful Women Than Handsome Men</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53570/More%2DBeautiful%2DWomen%2DThan%2DHandsome%2DMen</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101142.html"&gt;A new study&lt;/a&gt; by evolutionary psychologist &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/methodologyInstitute/whosWho/profiles/s.kanazawa@lse.ac.uk.htm&quot;&gt;Satoshi Kanazawa&lt;/a&gt; suggests there are more beautiful women than handsome men, finding that attractive people are significantly more likely to have a daughter than a son. Previous Kanazawa research found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/methodologyInstitute/pdf/SKanazawa/JTB2005b.pdf&quot;&gt;big and tall&lt;/a&gt;  parents, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/methodologyInstitute/pdf/SKanazawa/JTB2005a.pdf&quot;&gt;scientists, mathematicians, engineers&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/methodologyInstitute/pdf/SKanazawa/JTB2006a.pdf&quot;&gt;violent men&lt;/a&gt; tend to have sons; while nurses, social workers and kindergarten teachers tend to have daughters. &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freakonomics.com/blog/2006/08/02/why-do-beautiful-women-sometimes-marry-unattractive-men/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53570</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:43:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>beauty</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>evolutionarypsychology</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<dc:creator>CodeBaloo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Complexity of a Controversial Concept</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42922/The%2DComplexity%2Dof%2Da%2DControversial%2DConcept</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://bactra.org/bulletin/logic-of-diversity.html"&gt;The Logic of Diversity&lt;/a&gt; &quot;A new book, &lt;i&gt;The Wisdom of Crowds&lt;/i&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/33307&quot;&gt;..:&lt;/a&gt;]  by &lt;a href=&quot;http://greg.org/archive/new_yorker_magazine_database.php&quot;&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/a&gt; columnist James Surowiecki, has recently popularized the idea that groups can, in some ways, be smarter than their members, which is superficially similar to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cscs.umich.edu/~spage/&quot;&gt;Page&apos;s results&lt;/a&gt;. While Surowiecki gives many examples of what one might call collective cognition, where groups out-perform isolated individuals, he really has only one explanation for this phenomenon, based on one of his examples: jelly beans [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.randomhouse.com/features/wisdomofcrowds/contest.html&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;] averaging together many independent, unbiased guesses gives a result that is probably closer to the truth than any one guess. While true &#8212; it&apos;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_limit_theorem&quot;&gt;central limit theorem&lt;/a&gt; of statistics &#8212; it&apos;s far from being the only way in which &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cscs.umich.edu/diversity/&quot;&gt;diversity&lt;/a&gt; can be beneficial in problem solving.&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://bactra.org/weblog/362.html&quot;&gt;(Three-Toed Sloth)&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42922</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:03:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>complexity</category>
		<category>diversity</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>heuristics</category>
		<category>logic</category>
		<category>math</category>
		<category>mathematics</category>
		<category>physics</category>
		<category>probability</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>statistics</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Not MY great grandmother......</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25896/Not%2DMY%2Dgreat%2Dgrandmother</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3042781.stm"&gt;Eek eek! - Jennings Bryan spins in his grave:&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Chimpanzees are so closely related to humans that they should properly be considered as members of the human family, according to new genetic research.&quot; [BBC]  In the early 1900&apos;s, Jennings Bryan offered $100 in cash to anyone who signed an affidavit declaring that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/bryanw.htm&quot;&gt;he personally was descended from an ape.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25896</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2003 21:31:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chimpanzees</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>genetics</category>
		<category>jenningsbryan</category>
		<category>monkeys</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Blind Watchmaker ain&apos;t so blind after all.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22924/The%2DBlind%2DWatchmaker%2Daint%2Dso%2Dblind%2Dafter%2Dall</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993267"&gt;The &quot;Blind Watchmaker&quot; ain&apos;t so blind after all.&lt;/a&gt; An article in this week&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.elsevier.com/inca/publications/store/6/2/2/9/0/4/&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Journal of Theoretical Biology&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; claims that simple chemistry makes the evolution of complex organisms with nervous systems inevitable. Is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.world-of-dawkins.com/Dawkins/Work/Books/blind.htm&quot;&gt;random Darwinism&lt;/a&gt; being replaced by a more sophisticated notion of &quot;directed evolution&quot;? Could this confirm the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arn.org/idfaq/What%20is%20intelligent%20design.htm &quot;&gt;intelligent&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/cosmo.html&quot;&gt;design&lt;/a&gt;&quot; theory of Creation? This may have profound consequences for our understanding of how life has come to be on this planet (and others).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22924</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:32:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chemistry</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>Bletch</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/762/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_645000/645578.stm"&gt;And thanks to all the fish?&lt;/a&gt; British researchers say fans of loud music may be responding to a &apos;pleasure-inducing hearing mechanism&apos; passed down through evolution from fish to humans.
Well, slap me with a large trout!
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.762</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2000 00:38:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>fish</category>
		<category>hearing</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>prolific</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


