<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with executive</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/executive</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'executive' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:20:42 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:20:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>My taxes are going to whatnow?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79402/My%2Dtaxes%2Dare%2Dgoing%2Dto%2Dwhatnow</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/22/weekinreview/22gillen.html?_r=1&amp;hp&quot;&gt;The wall street brain drain defense&lt;/a&gt;.  Executive pay has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/04/business/04pay.html?scp=1&amp;sq=cap%20executive%20pay&amp;st=cse&quot;&gt;capped&lt;/a&gt; at 500k a year for companies bailed out by the government.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=agRC0._CfuBY&amp;refer=home&quot;&gt;Some argue&lt;/a&gt; it will lead to a brain drain on wall street.  Some say it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/archives/2009/02/pay_controls_do.html&quot;&gt;won&apos;t matter&lt;/a&gt;.   In any event, can the bankers even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/fashion/08halfmill.html?scp=1&amp;sq=%24500,000%20in%20this%20town&amp;st=cse&quot;&gt;live on 500k a year?&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79402</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:20:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>executive</category>
		<category>obscenesalaries</category>
		<category>salary</category>
		<category>wallstreet</category>
		<dc:creator>jourman2</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>9/11 changed everything? And the NSA is only looking at overseas and terrorist-related phone and internet records?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65531/911%2Dchanged%2Deverything%2DAnd%2Dthe%2DNSA%2Dis%2Donly%2Dlooking%2Dat%2Doverseas%2Dand%2Dterroristrelated%2Dphone%2Dand%2Dinternet%2Drecords</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202485_pf.html"&gt;to gather information about Americans&apos; phone records&lt;/a&gt; --&lt;i&gt;... the NSA had approached the company (Qwest) about participating in a warrantless surveillance program to gather information about Americans&apos; phone records.
...Nacchio&apos;s account, which places the NSA proposal at a meeting on Feb. 27, 2001, suggests that &lt;b&gt;the Bush administration was seeking to enlist telecommunications firms in programs without court oversight before the terrorist attacks on New York and the Pentagon. The Sept. 11 attacks have been cited by the government as the main impetus for its warrantless surveillance efforts.&lt;/b&gt; ...&lt;/i&gt; -- The Administration&apos;s crimes and illegal spying on all of us and Quest&apos;s punishment for not going along with their plans.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65531</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:04:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Americans</category>
		<category>ATT</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>crime</category>
		<category>Executive</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>illegal</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lies</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>phone</category>
		<category>Qwest</category>
		<category>secrecy</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Con vs. Con</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64517/Con%2Dvs%2DCon</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/but_is_it_war/"&gt;But Is It War?&lt;/a&gt; A vigorous debate among three conservatives about the limits of post-9/11 executive power.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64517</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:00:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>authority</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>executive</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>power</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>brain_drain</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>How much does your governor make?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61210/How%2Dmuch%2Ddoes%2Dyour%2Dgovernor%2Dmake</link>
		<description> Stateline.org has posted the results of a 2007 survey on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=207914&quot;&gt;the salaries of state governors&lt;/a&gt;, complete with neato bar graph.   The Governator&apos;s paycheck was recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://caljobsource.com/calsalaries.html&quot;&gt;voted up, making CA&apos;s the highest&lt;/a&gt; at $206,500, yet the Hollywood millionaire gives his back.  The governor of Maine makes less than his assistant.  Jon Corzine of NJ only makes $1 a year (and &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.nj.com/ledgerupdates/2007/04/corzine_will_pay_all_medical_b.html&quot;&gt;pays his own medical bills too&lt;/a&gt;).   Is it heartening to see the relatively moderate salaries alongside the number of executives giving back or refusing increases? Or is it a testimony to the notion that only the wealthy can afford to serve? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0725guvpay25.html&quot;&gt;Or something else altogether&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61210</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 07:43:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>electedofficials</category>
		<category>executive</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>governor</category>
		<category>pay</category>
		<category>salary</category>
		<dc:creator>pineapple</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Stay within the lines</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55299/Stay%2Dwithin%2Dthe%2Dlines</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.adtothebone.com/tecb/theexecutivecoloringbook.html"&gt;Executive Coloring Book.&lt;/a&gt; The original 1961 edition.  There have been imitations: The &lt;a href=&quot;http://feluxe.com/index.cfm?articleID=80&quot;&gt;Account Executive Coloring Book&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/49283&quot;&gt;A Coloring Book for Lawyers&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;small&gt;(via &lt;a href=&quot;http://presurfer.meepzorp.com/&quot;&gt;The Presurfer&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://texturl.net/&quot;&gt;TextUrl&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55299</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 09:03:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Executive</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>parody</category>
		<dc:creator>caddis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Madness of King George</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50354/The%2DMadness%2Dof%2DKing%2DGeorge</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/03/24/bush_shuns_patriot_act_requirement/"&gt;George Bush is exempt&lt;/a&gt; from the parts of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1229-35.htm&quot;&gt;much&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=11294&amp;c=207&quot;&gt;reviled&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/hr3162.html&quot;&gt;Patriot Act&lt;/a&gt; that he doesn&apos;t like -- by decree of George Bush. He &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/sns-ap-patriot-act,0,951378.story&quot;&gt;signed the bill&lt;/a&gt; with pomp and circumstance. But after the reporters and guests went home, he issued a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signing_Statement&quot;&gt;signing statement&lt;/a&gt;&quot; that he can withhold information from Congress in violation of the law.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50354</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:46:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Act</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>executive</category>
		<category>glorious</category>
		<category>leader</category>
		<category>Patriot</category>
		<category>unitary</category>
		<dc:creator>hipnerd</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Evidence of a Slippery Slope</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48924/Evidence%2Dof%2Da%2DSlippery%2DSlope</link>
		<description> Evidence of a slippery slope continued: &lt;i&gt;Newsweek&lt;/i&gt; reports that White House counsel Steve Bradbury &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11180519/site/newsweek/print/1/displaymode/1098/&quot;&gt;believes President Bush can order killings on US soil&lt;/a&gt; as part of the Terrorist-Surveillance Program&lt;sup&gt;&lt;small&gt;TM&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;.  Meanwhile, while &lt;a href=&quot;http://financialtimes.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&amp;title=FT.com+%2F+World+%2F+US+-+White+House+to+lash+out+at+media+coverage+of+terror+surveillance&amp;expire=&amp;urlID=17109725&amp;fb=Y&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F24f9f56e-96b5-11da-a5ba-0000779e2340%2Cs01%3D1.html&amp;partnerID=1700&quot;&gt;Attorney General Gonzales &quot;lashes out&quot; at the media and insists&lt;/a&gt; that the TSP&lt;sup&gt;&lt;small&gt;TM&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; is &quot;not a dragnet that sucks in all conversation and uses computer searches to pick out calls of interest,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/04/AR2006020401373_pf.html&quot;&gt;the Washington Post reports&lt;/a&gt; it&apos;s precisely that -- &quot;computer-controlled systems collect and sift basic information about hundreds of thousands of faxes, e-mails and telephone calls into and out of the United States before selecting the ones for scrutiny by human eyes and ears&quot; -- and has led to very few leads. (See also discussion of Arlen Specter and the legality of the TSP&lt;sup&gt;&lt;small&gt;TM&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/48913&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48924</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 06:56:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlQaeda</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>executive</category>
		<category>Gonzales</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>power</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>totalitarianism</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19780/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Business/reuters20020906_38.html"&gt;Help Jack Welch buy a newspaper&lt;/a&gt; Papers filed in the divorce of former General Electric chief Jack Welch contend that GE agreed to provide the executive enormous perks for life: access to corporate aircraft, use of a Manhattan apartment, Knicks floor-level seats, satellite TV at his four homes...plus costs... from wine and food to laundry, toiletries and newspapers, certain dining bills at the restaurant &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jean-georges.com/&quot;&gt;Jean Georges&lt;/a&gt;.
Good for him: but hasn&apos;t executive compensation reached &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aflcio.org/paywatch/&quot;&gt;a bizarre detachment from actual performance? &lt;/a&gt;(sorry, AFL-CIO link)?&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_17/b3729116.htm&quot;&gt;Unless of course you&apos;re a woman &lt;/a&gt; (Businessweek.com link, conservative-safe)
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19780</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:37:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>compensation</category>
		<category>divorce</category>
		<category>executive</category>
		<category>jackwelch</category>
		<dc:creator>matteo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12407/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/11/print/20011101-12.html"&gt;Bush signed an executive order&lt;/a&gt;  on Nov. 1 limiting the public&apos;s access to past presidents&apos; papers.  Many of Ronald Reagan&apos;s documents were set to go public, but the release was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/8141&quot;&gt;delayed&lt;/a&gt; while the current White House reviewed the policy for nine months.  Now, records don&apos;t go public until after 12 years, and once a request is made, the current president and the president in question have to approve access.  The only place I saw this reported was in a NYT &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/16/opinion/16REEV.html?pagewanted=print&quot;&gt;editorial&lt;/a&gt;. Is there something to hide?  Is the timing of this order improper?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12407</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2001 07:37:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>executive</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>order</category>
		<category>presidential</category>
		<category>records</category>
		<dc:creator>panopticon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8868/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1002,33%257E61437%257E36%257E94,00.html#RESULTS"&gt;Exec-worker gap in pay gets wider&lt;/a&gt; Executives make 442% more than they did in 1990.  Blue collar workers 2.7%.  1/3 of all Americans spent most of the 1990&apos;s working for $8 an hour or less.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8868</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2001 11:41:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>executive</category>
		<category>goldenparachute</category>
		<category>paygap</category>
		<dc:creator>crasspastor</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


