<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with exitstrategy</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/exitstrategy</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'exitstrategy' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:13:22 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:13:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Where&apos;s the exit?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52448/Wheres%2Dthe%2Dexit</link>
		<description> The debate over exit strategies for Iraq.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20060301faessay85201/stephen-biddle/seeing-baghdad-thinking-saigon.html?mode=print&quot;&gt;Stephen Biddle&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;em&gt;The biggest problem with treating Iraq like Vietnam is Iraqization -- the main
component of the current U.S. military strategy. In a people&apos;s war, handing the
fighting off to local forces makes sense because it undermines the nationalist
component of insurgent resistance, improves the quality of local intelligence,
and boosts troop strength. But in a &lt;/em&gt;&lt;b&gt;communal civil war&lt;/b&gt;&lt;em&gt;, it throws gasoline on
the fire. Iraq&apos;s Sunnis perceive the &quot;national&quot; army and police force as a
Shiite-Kurdish militia on steroids.&lt;/em&gt; Biddle also emphasizes the need for
a &lt;b&gt;compromise&lt;/b&gt; &lt;em&gt;based on a constitutional deal with ironclad power-sharing arrangements protecting all parties&lt;/em&gt;.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20060701faresponse85412/larry-diamond-james-dobbins-chaim-kaufmann-leslie-h-gelb-stephen-biddle/what-to-do-in-iraq-a-roundtable.html?mode=print&quot;&gt;Roundtable&lt;/a&gt;
responses from Larry Diamond, James Dobbins, Chaim Kaufmann, and Leslie Gelb.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://jebin08.blogspot.com/2006/05/cordesman-on-iraq.html&quot;&gt;Anthony Cordesman&lt;/a&gt;, who
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/iraq_wound.pdf&quot;&gt;anticipated the current situation&lt;/a&gt; (PDF),
emphasizes the need for ongoing US involvement in the region.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-benjamin24nov24,0,4137156.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions&quot;&gt;Daniel Benjamin&lt;/a&gt;
is pessimistic, describing the US as being in a no-win situation whether
it stays or leaves. A list of proposed
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comw.org/pda/0512exitplans.html&quot;&gt;exit strategies&lt;/a&gt;
collected by the Project for Defense Alternatives.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theonion.com/content/node/30931&quot;&gt;The Onion&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52448</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:13:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AnthonyCordesman</category>
		<category>DanielBenjamin</category>
		<category>exitstrategy</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>StephenBiddle</category>
		<dc:creator>russilwvong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Wrong War &amp;amp; Exit Strategy:Civil War &amp;amp; News From Kirkuk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42777/The%2DWrong%2DWar%2Dand%2DExit%2DStrategyCivil%2DWar%2Dand%2DNews%2DFrom%2DKirkuk</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;A distinction between &#8220;old&#8221; and &#8220;new&#8221; wars is vital. &#8220;Old wars&#8221; are wars between states where the aim is the military capture of territory and the decisive encounter is battle between armed forces. &#8220;New wars&#8221;, in contrast, take place in the context of failing states. They are wars fought by networks of state and non-state actors, where battles are rare and violence is directed mainly against civilians, and which are characterised by a new type of political economy that combines extremist politics and criminality... I argue in this article that the United States viewed its invasion of Iraq as an updated version of &#8220;old war&#8221; that made use of new technology. The US failure to understand the reality on the ground in Iraq and the tendency to impose its own view of what war should be like is immensely dangerous and carries the risk of being self-perpetuating. It does not have to be this way. &lt;/small&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/articles/ViewPopUpArticle.jsp?id=2&amp;articleId=2591&quot; title=&quot;In early June 2005, it is hard to be optimistic. The insurgency is escalating - more attacks, more casualties, more groups and more names are reported daily. The idea of Bush as a successful wartime leader, pioneering the new technology-intensive form of warfare, helped contribute to his November 2004 election victory; the more hawkish elements of his first administration have been reappointed and promoted. The American pursuit of a moral crusade reinforces the insurgents&#8217; notion of a global jihad. Indeed, the new war in Iraq can increasingly be viewed as the stage for a global new war, which will be hard to contain as the ideas and experiences spread and hard to end because of the bitterness, fear and hate that are mobilised in war... Will reality bring about a questioning of the story of old war and its contemporary relevance? Are other actors - the United Nations, the European Union, together with Iraqi civil society - able, even at this late stage, to develop an alternative strategy: one based on constructive, democratic, forward-thinking principles that could offer a convincing way forward for Iraq&#8217;s people, and might help to avert a global new war?&quot;&gt;Iraq: the wrong war &lt;/a&gt; - Mary Kaldor writes of what was happening in pre-invasion Iraq, what happened thereafter and what the alternatives were. Well, there is always &lt;a href=&quot;http://207.44.245.159/article9099.htm&quot; title=&quot;Against all odds, a national liberation front is emerging in Iraq. Washington hawks may see it coming, but they certainly don&apos;t want it. Many groups in this front have already met in Algiers. The front is opposed to the American occupation and permanent Pentagon military bases; opposed to the privatization and corporate looting of the Iraqi economy; and opposed to the federation of Iraq, ie balkanization... The Bush administration though is pulling no punches with Iraqification. It&apos;s a Pandora&apos;s box: inside one will find the Battle of Algiers, Vietnam, El Salvador, Colombia. All point to the same destination: civil war. This deadly litany could easily go on until 2020 when, in a brave new world of China emerging as the top economy, Sunni Arabs would finally convince themselves to perhaps strike a deal with Shi&apos;ites and Kurds so they can all profit together by selling billions of barrels of oil to the Chinese oil majors. If, of course, there is any semblance of Iraq left at that point.&quot;&gt;Exit strategy: Civil war.&lt;/a&gt;  And on that, note this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/14/AR2005061401828_pf.html&quot; title=&quot;Police and security units, forces led by Kurdish political parties and backed by the U.S. military, have abducted hundreds of minority Arabs and Turkmens in this intensely volatile city and spirited them to prisons in Kurdish-held northern Iraq, according to U.S. and Iraqi officials, government documents and families of the victims. Seized off the streets of Kirkuk or in joint U.S.-Iraqi raids, the men have been transferred secretly and in violation of Iraqi law to prisons in the Kurdish cities of Irbil and Sulaymaniyah, sometimes with the knowledge of U.S. forces. The detainees, including merchants, members of tribal families and soldiers, have often remained missing for months; some have been tortured, according to released prisoners and the Kirkuk police chief.&quot;&gt;Kurdish Officials Sanction Abductions in Kirkuk&lt;/a&gt;--a city from which, I am afraid, we will hear more and more as time goes by.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42777</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 08:17:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>deadlinks</category>
		<category>exitstrategy</category>
		<category>failedstates</category>
		<category>failingstates</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqWar</category>
		<category>MaryKaldor</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>strategy</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WMDs</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Exit Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33296/Exit%2DStrategy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2100933/"&gt;Exit Strategy&lt;/a&gt; How to get out of &lt;strike&gt;the quagmire that is&lt;/strike&gt;  Iraq:
&lt;blockquote&gt;To implement this exit strategy, we will have to practice running quickly. It is further recommended that, while running, the eyes be cast down, to avoid witnessing any last-minute people trying to kill us. We will have to establish excellent communications so that the moment that final person begins dying, we can all begin running quickly at the same time, eyes cast down, quickly, to our vehicles, to get to the airport and get out of the country.&lt;/blockquote&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33296</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 10:27:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>exitstrategy</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>Slate</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>dayvin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


