<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with fairandbalanced</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/fairandbalanced</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'fairandbalanced' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:57:20 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:57:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Fair and Balanced is fair to use</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27821/Fair%2Dand%2DBalanced%2Dis%2Dfair%2Dto%2Duse</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=entertainmentNews&amp;amp;storyID=3324568"&gt;Fox Loses Bid to Stop Sale of Franken Book&lt;/a&gt; &quot;There are hard cases and there are easy cases. This is an easy case,&quot; said U.S. District Judge Denny Chin. &quot;This case is wholly without merit both factually and legally.&quot; As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/27669&quot;&gt;so many of us&lt;/a&gt; understood without the need for big expensive lawyers.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27821</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:57:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alfranken</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>fairandbalanced</category>
		<category>fairuse</category>
		<category>foxnews</category>
		<dc:creator>billsaysthis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>New Mefi tagline...?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27669/New%2DMefi%2Dtagline</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.blah3.com/graymatter/archives/00000420.html"&gt;Metafilter: Fair &amp; Balanced[tm] -&lt;/a&gt; reclaim free speech tomorrow!
This Friday, August 15, is Fair And Balanced day on the Internet... according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nealpollack.com/cgi-bin/blog/do.cgi/200308122150/permalink&quot;&gt;Neal Pollack&lt;/a&gt;, Atrios and &lt;a href=&quot;http://instapundit.com/&quot;&gt;o&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yourish.com/&quot;&gt;t&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://textism.com/&quot;&gt;h&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buzzflash.com/&quot;&gt;e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://democrats.com/ailes&quot;&gt;r&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thismodernworld.com/&quot;&gt;s&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;Development to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/27606&quot;&gt;this &lt;/a&gt;thread&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27669</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2003 16:31:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Blogging</category>
		<category>FairAndBalanced</category>
		<category>Mefi</category>
		<category>memes</category>
		<dc:creator>dash_slot-</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fair Use Unbalanced.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27606/Fair%2DUse%2DUnbalanced</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGA59PHZ8JD.html"&gt;Fair Use Unbalanced.&lt;/a&gt; Fox News has filed a lawsuit against Al Franken and his publisher for using their trademarked slogan in the title of his new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0525947647/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;book&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27606</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 20:25:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>FairAndBalanced</category>
		<category>Fox</category>
		<category>FoxNews</category>
		<category>Franken</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fair and Balanced</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26247/Fair%2Dand%2DBalanced</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2970064.stm&quot; title=&quot;A leaked US intelligence report has cast fresh doubt on the coalition claims that Iraq had banned weapons which served as justification for going to war. &quot;&gt;BBC&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Fresh doubts over Iraq&apos;s arsenal&quot;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/06/06/sprj.irq.wmd/index.html&quot; title=&quot;WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A senior Bush administration official said Friday that a Defense Intelligence Agency report from September 2002, which stated &quot;there is no reliable information whether iraq is producing and stockpiling chemical weapons, did not conflict with the u.s. case that iraq had weapons of mass destruction.&gt;CNN &lt;/a&gt;&quot;Pentagon: WMD report consistent with U.S. case&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.google.com/news?num=30&amp;hl=en&amp;edition=usa&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=cluster:www%2erealcities%2ecom%2fmld%2fkrwashington%2f5999131%2ehtm&quot;&gt;Google News &lt;/a&gt;lists many other sources on this topic, with &lt;a href=&quot;http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&amp;storyID=2889971&quot; title=&quot;Reuters:U.S. Secret Report Raises Questions Over Iraqi Weapons&quot;&gt;varying &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.com/news/923165.asp&quot; title=&quot;MSNBC:Agency chief clarifies Iraq report. Says even though U.S. didn&#8217;t know location of chemical weapons facilities, it had no doubt of existence of programs&quot;&gt;titles &lt;/a&gt;depending on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,88767,00.html&quot; title=&quot;FoxNews:DIA Had No Evidence of Chemical Weapons in Iraq Last September. &apos;OK, this one even shocked me, I thought Fox would bury this&apos;&quot;&gt;who &lt;/a&gt;you read.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26247</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2003 13:49:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>cnn</category>
		<category>fairandbalanced</category>
		<category>googlenews</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newswires</category>
		<category>reuters</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>CrazyJub</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Foxing Up Saddam</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23317/Foxing%2DUp%2DSaddam</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.iraqjournal.org/journals/030131.html"&gt;Is Fox News Giving &quot;Aid &amp; Comfort&quot; to Saddam?&lt;/a&gt; Contributing money to the regime they hate so much - without disclosing it - seems to go against the grain of the flag-waving network. I don&apos;t think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,64852,00.html&quot;&gt;Barbara Streisand ever contributed&lt;/a&gt; any money to Baghdad... (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://nielsenhayden.com/electrolite/&quot;&gt;Electrolite&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23317</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:00:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fairandbalanced</category>
		<category>FOX</category>
		<category>Foxnews</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>saddam</category>
		<category>saddamhussein</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


