<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with fallacies</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/fallacies</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'fallacies' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 10:04:05 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 10:04:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The Weak Man Argument</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84795/The%2DWeak%2DMan%2DArgument</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/the-weak-man/&quot;&gt;The Weak Man Argument&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=getting-duped&quot;&gt;Getting Duped: How the Media Messes with Your Mind&lt;/a&gt;. A variant of the &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man&quot;&gt;Straw Man fallacy&lt;/a&gt;,&apos; the &apos;weak man&apos; doesn&apos;t misstate a rival&apos;s position like a &apos;straw man,&apos; but instead chooses &quot;the opposition&#8217;s weakest (or one of its weakest) arguments or proponents for attack.&quot; Originally proposed by Robert Talisse and Scott Aikin &lt;a href=&quot;http://people.vanderbilt.edu/~robert.talisse/StrawMan_argumentation.pdf&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  (pdf)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84795</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 10:04:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>argumentation</category>
		<category>fallacies</category>
		<category>strawman</category>
		<category>weakman</category>
		<dc:creator>anotherpanacea</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A decent list from Cracked? Wow.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80112/A%2Ddecent%2Dlist%2Dfrom%2DCracked%2DWow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cracked.com/article_17142_5-ways-common-sense-lies-you-everyday.html"&gt;Five ways &apos;common sense&apos; lies to you&lt;/a&gt; - a description of some everyday logical fallacies and how they effect us in a larger scale.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80112</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:56:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>article</category>
		<category>crackedcom</category>
		<category>enumeration</category>
		<category>fallacies</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>logic</category>
		<category>logical</category>
		<dc:creator>flatluigi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Hierarchy of Disagreement</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71847/Hierarchy%2Dof%2DDisagreement</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blog.createdebate.com/2008/04/07/how-to-write-strong-arguments/"&gt;The Hierarchy of Disagreement:&lt;/a&gt; Based on Paul Graham&apos;s essay &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html&quot;&gt;How to Disagree&lt;/a&gt;&quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/70350/Turning-writing-into-a-conversation&quot;&gt;prev&lt;/a&gt;), the diagram ranks the types of arguments that can be made. Not quite the same as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/&quot;&gt;logical fallacies&lt;/a&gt; but a useful guide to measure whether you&apos;re making a good argument or if &quot;you are an &lt;a href=&quot;http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/ass-hat/nexx-x60-helmet-lets-you-wear-your-jeans-on-your-head-260137.php&quot;&gt;ass hat&lt;/a&gt;&quot;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71847</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 09:47:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>argument</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>fallacies</category>
		<category>hierarchy</category>
		<category>paulgraham</category>
		<dc:creator>GuyZero</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Best of the logical web</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49114/Best%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dlogical%2Dweb</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fallacyfiles.org/"&gt;Fallacy Files&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49114</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:21:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>argument</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>fallacies</category>
		<category>logic</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>reason</category>
		<category>reasoning</category>
		<category>thinking</category>
		<category>truth</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16805/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.datanation.com/fallacies/index.htm"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;This Index of Logical Fallacies&lt;/a&gt;   looks like it should be required reading for anyone who wants to participate in online discussions. (Hello, Metafilterians? I&apos;m looking in your direction...)&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

This from someone named &lt;a href=http://www.megnut.com/&gt;Meg Hourihan&lt;/a&gt;. . .I found the link useful (very) while finding the linker very condescending, in this case.  I guess we can consider ourselves slapped, huh?
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16805</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2002 14:15:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>database</category>
		<category>fallacies</category>
		<category>logic</category>
		<category>MegHourihan</category>
		<category>MegNut</category>
		<dc:creator>Danf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8748/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vandruff.com/art_converse.html"&gt;Terrorists on MeFi!&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8748</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2001 11:10:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>argument</category>
		<category>fallacies</category>
		<category>trolls</category>
		<dc:creator>geronimo_rex</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4444/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/dailynews/news.jsp?id=ns9999196"&gt;A classic example&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/post-hoc.html&quot;&gt;Post Hoc Fallacy&lt;/a&gt;. Explanation inside.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4444</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2000 17:17:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fallacies</category>
		<category>fallacy</category>
		<category>posthoc</category>
		<category>posthocfallacy</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


