<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with fetus and brokenlink</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/fetus+brokenlink</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'fetus' and 'brokenlink' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:42:49 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:42:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Conservatives Win Big With Fetus Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32045/Conservatives%2DWin%2DBig%2DWith%2DFetus%2DBill</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/ap/20040326/ap_on_go_co/fetus_rights&amp;amp;cid=512&amp;amp;ncid=716"&gt;Conservatives Win Big With Fetus Bill&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32045</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:42:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bill</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>crime</category>
		<category>fetus</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>murder</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>UnbornVictims</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>SpaceCadet</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Reach in and touch someone</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21976/Reach%2Din%2Dand%2Dtouch%2Dsomeone</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.novint.com/eTouch_Sono.htm"&gt;Reach in and touch someone.&lt;/a&gt; Having a baby?  Have money to burn?  Think a video of your baby&apos;s ultrasound would just be &lt;i&gt;so&lt;/i&gt; passe?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.novint.com/&quot;&gt;Novint Technologies&lt;/a&gt; has developed a system that will let you &quot;touch&quot; your unborn child -- or at least a 3D ultrasound image of it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21976</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2002 19:43:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>3D</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>fetus</category>
		<category>Novint</category>
		<category>NovintTechnologies</category>
		<category>pregnancy</category>
		<category>simulation</category>
		<category>touch</category>
		<category>ultrasound</category>
		<dc:creator>zztzed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14346/</link>
		<description> We interrupt your war on terror to attack abortion rights...  &lt;br&gt;
The Bush administration has declared that &lt;a href=http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/wire/la-013102unborn_wr.story?coll=la%2Dap%2Dtopnews%2Dheadlines&gt;a fetus is an unborn child&lt;/a&gt;.  And why not?  Everyone believes in prenatal care.  And of course, if the government wanted to extend medical coverage to poor pregnant women under the Children&apos;s Health Insurance Program (CHIPS), it could have done so directly.  But then, what fun is that?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14346</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:01:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>fetus</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>healthcare</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<dc:creator>jellybuzz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8853/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/print/nationpolitics/A29573-2001Jul6.html"&gt;Health Care For Youngest Americans...or Sneak Attack On Pro-Choice Lobby?&lt;/a&gt; Interesting proposal from HHS...guaranteed to fan the flames of what has been called the &quot;most divisive issue in modern America.&quot;  Should a fetus be classified as a &quot;beneficiary&quot; of health care benefits under the Children&apos;s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)?  If this proposal is approved, will it forever change the debate?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8853</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2001 07:31:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>fetus</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>healthcare</category>
		<category>insurance</category>
		<category>prochoice</category>
		<category>prolife</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>davidmsc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7266/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010426/ts/congress_abortion_dc.html"&gt;Fetus is a person? &lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;The bill&apos;s supporters, predominantly Republicans during the debate, denied the measure is anti-abortion, and instead is aimed at punishing criminals who attack pregnant women. It exempts abortions performed with the woman&apos;s consent.&lt;/i&gt;

Is that all it is or is there a set up for further laws, going into abortion and such?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7266</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2001 12:54:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortionfilter</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>fetus</category>
		<category>prochoice</category>
		<category>prolife</category>
		<dc:creator>tiaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


