<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with fhm</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/fhm</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'fhm' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 20:55:16 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 20:55:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>...or memorex?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/44009/or%2Dmemorex</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://musicthing.blogspot.com/2005/08/welcome-fhm-readers.html"&gt;FHM rips off Music Thing blog.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://musicthing.blogspot.com/2005/05/all-this-week-tiny-music-makers.html&quot;&gt;Compare&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitwell.ndo.co.uk/musicthing/images/fhmbig.jpg&quot;&gt;contrast.&lt;/a&gt;  Fair use or a plain old fashioned rip-off? You make the call.  Seriously, how common is this kind of thing and is the net producing content to be repackaged and sold commercially without proper permission?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.44009</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 20:55:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>fhm</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>thing</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


