<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with filesharing and metallica</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/filesharing+metallica</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'filesharing' and 'metallica' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:46:19 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:46:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7351/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.speakeasy.net/refer/w/metslash/ "&gt;How to win friends and influence people!&lt;/a&gt; Metallica goes after Seattle ISP for copyright infringement.
I got this link from a pal-has anyone else heard about it?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7351</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:46:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>copyrightinfringement</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>isp</category>
		<category>metallica</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>p2p</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<category>seattle</category>
		<dc:creator>black8</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3284/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tonos.com/tonos/jsp/commentary_corner_lars_ulrich_1.jsp"&gt;Lars&apos; statement to the Comittee&lt;/a&gt; - I don&apos;t know how many lawyers co-operated for writting this, but it&apos;s the art of writing at its best. It almost convinced me to stop trading .mp3 files. What do you think about Lars&apos; speech?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3284</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2000 12:42:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>metallica</category>
		<dc:creator>kchristidis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2430/</link>
		<description> Wow! &lt;a href=&quot;http://music.zdnet.com/features/metallicatestimony/&quot;&gt; Lars Ulrich makes a valid point!&lt;/a&gt; Who&apos;d a thunk it? While he still fails to notice the obvious benefits the Nap&apos; provides, or make amends for attacking his own fans (or at the very least realized that it&apos;s not Congress&apos; place to meddle), Lars has gone ahead and more clearly illuminated his own point of view. Now if only he could have STARTED his argument a few months ago with such calm and coherent points (as opposed to grandiose posturing), this whole Napster debate would be a bit more...um...SOLVED by now?!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2430</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:20:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>larsulrich</category>
		<category>metallica</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>napster</category>
		<category>rock</category>
		<dc:creator>NickBarat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1773/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cnn.com/LAW/columns/dual.metallica.05.19/"&gt;An interview&lt;/a&gt;  with the lawyers from Napster and Metellica. Good points, both.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1773</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2000 10:30:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>IntellectualProperty</category>
		<category>interview</category>
		<category>IP</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>Metallica</category>
		<category>MP3s</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>Napster</category>
		<category>P2P</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<category>USlaw</category>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1638/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/log/2000/05/10/napster_metallica/index.html"&gt;Napster throws Metallica a curveball.&lt;/a&gt; Napster has been pointing out to its kicked-off users a certain provision of the DMCA: If an ISP kicks a user off a service for violating copyright, that user may file a counternotification if they believe they were wrongly accused.  The plaintiff (Metallica) then has 10 days to respond with a lawsuit directly against that user.  If they choose not to respond, the ISP must restore the account.  If enough users (among the 300,000 blocked) file counternotifications, Metallica may wish it had never begun this process.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1638</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2000 08:09:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dmca</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>lawsuits</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>metallica</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>napster</category>
		<dc:creator>daveadams</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1550/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.law.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/AppLogic+FTContentServer?pagename=law/View&amp;amp;c=Article&amp;amp;cid=ZZZOCGNMT7C&amp;amp;live=true&amp;amp;cst=1&amp;amp;pc=0&amp;amp;pa=0&amp;amp;s=News&amp;amp;ExpIgnore=true&amp;amp;showsummary=0"&gt;Metallica and Napster: The Chat.&lt;/a&gt; My favorite quote: &quot;For the doubters out there, Metallica will carry on for the next 20 years,&quot; Ulrich said. &quot;Whether you&apos;re around for the ride or not, that&apos;s your problem, not ours.&quot; 
Oh, &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1550</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2000 09:20:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>lanceulrich</category>
		<category>metallica</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>napster</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1388/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000418/en/music-napster_1.html"&gt;Another music artist that doesn&apos;t get it: Dr. Dre.&lt;/a&gt; I knew the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/detail.cfm?link_ID=1331&quot;&gt;Metallica thing&lt;/a&gt; could start a rash of followers, hopefully this isn&apos;t a trend. Why is it so difficult for artists to see that fans trading their music is a &lt;b&gt;good&lt;/b&gt; thing? (including better sales of discs thanks to the people hearing the mp3&apos;s and better concert sales from fans buying tickets to see them live)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1388</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2000 13:22:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>downloads</category>
		<category>drdre</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>metallica</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>napster</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


