<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with filters and filtering</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/filters+filtering</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'filters' and 'filtering' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:44:51 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:44:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>WARNING: This page may be altered in transit!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70882/WARNING%2DThis%2Dpage%2Dmay%2Dbe%2Daltered%2Din%2Dtransit</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080416-research-1-3-percent-of-web-pages-altered-in-transit.html&quot;&gt;ArsTechnica is reporting on the practice of altering and editing web-traffic enroute from the server to your client/browser.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://vancouver.cs.washington.edu/#test-results&quot;&gt;Is your ISP, work or connection path altering your requested documents? Find out here.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70882</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:44:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Filtering</category>
		<category>Filters</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>Open</category>
		<category>Proxies</category>
		<category>Proxy</category>
		<category>Web</category>
		<category>WebStandards</category>
		<dc:creator>loquacious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A pox on your house, Spammer</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29529/A%2Dpox%2Don%2Dyour%2Dhouse%2DSpammer</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/29354"&gt;Spammers strike back?&lt;/a&gt; Well then call this &lt;a href=&quot;http://kalsey.com/2003/11/comment_spam_manifesto/&quot;&gt;return of the Webmaster Jedi&lt;/a&gt;.  As a blogger and domain owner, I am sick of waking up to fifty new comments, all of which are spam for something of dubious legality.  The fine folks at Kalsey are angry too.  And they declared war.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogdex.net/track.asp?id=7581754&quot;&gt;Lots of people stood up and took notice&lt;/a&gt;.  What can you do to help stop this infestation?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://mt-plugins.org/archives/entry/blacklist.php&quot;&gt;Blacklists&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://mt-plugins.org/archives/entry/bayesian.php&quot;&gt;Bayesian filtering&lt;/a&gt; come to mind...
(Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smartmobs.com/&quot;&gt;Smart Mobs&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29529</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:00:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>filtering</category>
		<category>filters</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<category>spammers</category>
		<dc:creator>swerdloff</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6268/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/17433.html"&gt;Can &quot;blocking software&quot; companies be sued?&lt;/a&gt; This is interesting. &lt;i&gt;The Register&lt;/i&gt; (a respected if somewhat snide computer industry online rag) has somehow managed to land on Cyber Patrol&apos;s block list as a &quot;sex site&quot;. Now they&apos;re conducting something called an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.org.uk&quot;&gt;ABCe audit&lt;/a&gt; and they&apos;re making nasty noises about &quot;restraint of trade&quot;. Which makes me wonder if they&apos;re thinking &quot;lawsuit&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The blocking-software companies have been using rather broad brushes in making their blocking lists. Although some claim that any site they block is checked by a human first, with thousands of new sites appearing every day there simply isn&apos;t any way. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peacefire.org&quot;&gt;Peacefire&lt;/a&gt; has documented hundreds of sites which were blocked inappropriately. I am pretty certain that under US law that blockees have no recourse -- but perhaps the law in the EU is different. Anyone over there care to comment? Is it plausible that an &quot;ABCe audit&quot; could result in a lawsuit? (I&apos;d really &lt;i&gt;love&lt;/i&gt; to see a few high profile big-bucks lawsuits here.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6268</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2001 07:53:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cyberpatrol</category>
		<category>filtering</category>
		<category>filters</category>
		<category>register</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3448/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dfn.org/Alerts/contest.htm"&gt;Winners of the Foil the Filters Contest.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3448</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2000 11:25:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>filtering</category>
		<category>filters</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<dc:creator>quirked</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


