<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with firstamendment and politics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/firstamendment+politics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'firstamendment' and 'politics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:19:51 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:19:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Rally Squads ORLY?  RLY.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64044/Rally%2DSquads%2DORLY%2DRLY</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/pdfs/freespeech/presidential_advance_manual.pdf&quot;&gt;Presidential Advance Manual&lt;/a&gt; [pdf] has been leaked, apparently.  WaPo reporter Peter Baker discusses &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/21/AR2007082101662.html&quot;&gt;the &quot;rally squads&quot; to be set up by the advance team,&lt;/a&gt; whose job is to drown out potential protesters with chants of &quot;USA! USA!&quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2172500/&quot;&gt;Slate&apos;s Dahlia Lithwick opines as well&lt;/a&gt;, and relates the document to the recent payment of &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070817/ap_on_re_us/bush_protesters_lawsuit_2&quot;&gt;80,000 dollars to two people who had the unmitigated gall to wear anti-Bush T-shirts at a public event&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64044</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:19:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>firstamendment</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>rallysquad</category>
		<dc:creator>bardic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Framers and The Faithful.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50200/The%2DFramers%2Dand%2DThe%2DFaithful</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0604.waldman.html"&gt;How modern evangelicals are ignoring their own history.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Even though Jefferson was labeled anti-religion by some, he had become a hero to evangelicals&#8212;not in spite of his views on separation of church and state, but because of them.&quot;

(via &lt;a href=&quot;http://aldaily.com/&quot;&gt;A&amp;amp;L Daily&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50200</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:18:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>evangelicalchristians</category>
		<category>firstamendment</category>
		<category>jefferson</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>separationofchurchandstate</category>
		<dc:creator>darkstar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Anti-Religious Discrimination or Seperation of Church and State?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28236/AntiReligious%2DDiscrimination%2Dor%2DSeperation%2Dof%2DChurch%2Dand%2DState</link>
		<description> The Bush administration has today &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=11914&quot;&gt;stepped into the Supreme Court&#8217;s next major church-state case&lt;/a&gt;, by siding with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclj.org/ussc/daveylocke/index.asp&quot;&gt;the ACLJ&lt;/a&gt; and asking the high court to allow a state merit scholarship to be applied towards a degree in theology at a Christian College.  Is this a valid example of the separation of Church and State, or unreasonable anti-religious discrimination?  More inside.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28236</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:48:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>churchstate</category>
		<category>firstamendment</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<dc:creator>gd779</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10331/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=14891"&gt;First Amendment advocates fear erosion of rights in aftermath of attacks.&lt;/a&gt; In the aftermath of the worst terrorist attack in America, First Amendment proponents expect and fear that the nation&apos;s heightened national security concerns will soon overpower some of its basic freedoms.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10331</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2001 18:41:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>FirstAmendment</category>
		<category>freedom</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>tpoh.org</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6650/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,42708,00.html"&gt;Anti-abortion site wins appeal.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;In a ringing defense of the First Amendment, Judge Alex Kozinski wrote that &quot;political speech may not be punished just because it makes it more likely that someone will be harmed at some unknown time in the future by an unrelated third party.&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
Courtney Love can sue when her cell phone # is released on a website, and yet doctors have their personal information posted online specifically so they can be tracked and killed.  Scary.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6650</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:33:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>firstamendment</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>jragon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3226/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thenation.com/issue/000918/0918pollitt.shtml"&gt;Sectarian politicians&lt;/a&gt; often claim that the First amendment doesn&apos;t mandate separation of church and state, but history differs with them.  Maybe voters should stop listening to self righteous politicos praying on street corners.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3226</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2000 11:51:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>churches</category>
		<category>firstamendment</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>norm</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


