<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with fiscalpolicies</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/fiscalpolicies</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'fiscalpolicies' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2003 22:49:40 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2003 22:49:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>A flood of red ink</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29428/A%2Dflood%2Dof%2Dred%2Dink</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/world/na/PrinterFriendly.cfm?Story_ID=2189237&quot; title=&quot;America&apos;s fiscal position has deteriorated fast during George Bush&apos;s presidency. It will not be easy to reverse.&quot;&gt;A flood of red ink&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;This time the turnaround will be much tougher. There will be no &#8220;peace dividend&#8221; from the end of the cold war (indeed, the pressure on military spending may continue to increase). America is unlikely to see another stockmarket bubble, with its surge in tax revenues. As baby-boomers retire, the pressure from entitlement spending will be more acute. Set against this background, the path back to a sustainable fiscal policy will be extremely painful, even without any dramatic fiscal crisis. Long after Dubya is back on his ranch, Americans will be trying to recover from the mess he created.&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29428</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2003 22:49:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>budgets</category>
		<category>deficit</category>
		<category>fiscalpolicies</category>
		<category>nationaldebt</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>UnitedStates</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19975/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&amp;amp;c=StoryFT&amp;amp;cid=1031119283744&amp;amp;p=1012571727102"&gt;Republicans&apos; economic policy is now closer to that associated with the Democrats, and vice versa.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Since the 1960s, the Republican and Democrat administrations have switched places on economic policy. The pattern is so well established that the generalisation can no longer be denied: the Republicans have become the party of fiscal irresponsibility, trade restriction, big government and bad microeconomics.&quot; Who&apos;d have ever thought Bush would follow a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bized.ac.uk/case/case_studies/case010-fulltext.htm&quot;&gt;Keynesian economic policy&lt;/a&gt;? Meanwhile, as the budget deficit grows, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globeandmail.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/PEstory/TGAM/20020913/RGREE/International/international/international_temp/4/4/20/&quot;&gt;Greenspan cautions &lt;/a&gt;fiscal responsibility.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19975</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2002 06:40:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>fiscalpolicies</category>
		<category>policies</category>
		<category>politicalparties</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<dc:creator>Kneebiter</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


