<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with foreignpolicy and politics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/foreignpolicy+politics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'foreignpolicy' and 'politics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:38:22 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:38:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>When keeping it real(ist) goes wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/83508/When%2Dkeeping%2Dit%2Drealist%2Dgoes%2Dwrong</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Back when he was younger, Jay-Z was a merciless, ruthless killer in the &quot;beefs&quot; which define hip hop politics. [...] As Jay-Z got older and more powerful, the marginal benefits of such battles declined and the costs increased even as the number of would-be rivals escalated. Just as the U.S. attracts resentment and rhetorical anti-Americanism simply by virtue of being on top, so did Jay-Z attract a disproportionate number of attackers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Marc Lynch &lt;a href=&quot;http://lynch.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/07/13/jay_z_vs_the_game_lessons_for_the_american_primacy_debate&quot;&gt;compares international relations to rap feuds&lt;/a&gt;, with Jay-Z as the hegemon and up-and-comer The Game as the &quot;insurgent.&quot; Lynch&apos;s article &lt;a href=&quot;http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/07/ir_theory_and_rap.html&quot;&gt;inspired&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/07/jay-z_the_game_and_global_hegemony.php&quot;&gt;several&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/07/14/the-only-blogger-to-rewrite-history-without-a-pen/&quot;&gt;reactions&lt;/a&gt;, and landed him an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106857447&quot;&gt;interview with NPR&lt;/a&gt; earlier today. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.83508</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:38:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>hiphop</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>rap</category>
		<dc:creator>aheckler</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Axis of Upheaval</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79390/The%2DAxis%2Dof%2DUpheaval</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4704"&gt;The Axis of Upheaval:&lt;/a&gt; A special report on the coming age of instability.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79390</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:49:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Economics</category>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>Instability</category>
		<category>Mexico</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Russia</category>
		<category>Somalia</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Leadership for the 21st Century</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75866/Leadership%2Dfor%2Dthe%2D21st%2DCentury</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.hbs.edu/centennial/businesssummit/charlie-rose.html"&gt;Leadership for the 21st Century&lt;/a&gt; Harvard Business School hosts moderator Charlie Rose in a roundtable discussion concerning the credit crisis, housing, American leadership and foreign affairs. Participants are the 2008 HBS Alumni Achievement Award recipients, including eBay (and McCain advisor) CEO Meg Whitman, GE CEO Jeff Immelt, Venture Capitalist extrordinaire&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Doerr&quot;&gt; John Doerr&lt;/a&gt;, Indian business juggernaut &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahindra_%26_Mahindra_Limited&quot;&gt;Anand G. Mahindra&lt;/a&gt;, and former World Bank president James D. Wolfensohn.

This aired on PBS last night and it was some of the most honest, intelligent, and inspiring  discussion I have heard in some time. While the only transcript I could find is a paid one &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alacrastore.com/storecontent/voxanttv/2008pb102001cc111&quot;&gt;here, &lt;/a&gt; this 100 minute video should be required viewing for anyone working in a fortune 500 company, or those interested in politics, environmentalism, technology, foreign policy or the election. I only caught the tail end of last night&apos;s airing, (and I&apos;m watching the whole thing as I post this) but a couple of things that really stood out for me: Mahindra&apos;s statements regarding the schizophrenia of India toward America; Doerr&apos;s excitement on the potential for future innovation around climate change technology and call for the restoration of DARPA; and the general optimism of the participants, especially that of Immelt, whose company&apos;s stock is at a 50 year low.

If the last half hour of this could light a fire under my butt, then I would love to see what the whole thing does to the Mefite population. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75866</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:56:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>environmentalism</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>leadership</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>worldaffairs</category>
		<dc:creator>daHIFI</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Stakes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75633/The%2DStakes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2008/0808.stakes2008.html"&gt;The Stakes, 2008.&lt;/a&gt; Eight of the &lt;i&gt;Washington Monthly&apos;s&lt;/i&gt; contributing editors &quot;consider the looming challenges that America is likely to face&#8212;in the economy, education, the courts, and other areas&#8212;during an Obama or McCain presidency, and how, based on what we know about the two men, they are likely to handle them.&quot; Also in the &lt;i&gt;Washington Monthly&lt;/i&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2008/0808.leverett.html&quot;&gt;The Grand Bargain: Five presidents have treated Iran as a threat. The next needs to think of it as an opportunity.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75633</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:34:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Diplomacy</category>
		<category>Economy</category>
		<category>Election</category>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>HealthCare</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Admiral Fallon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69646/Admiral%2DFallon</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/fox-fallon"&gt;The Man Between War and Peace.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;As head of U. S. Central Command, Admiral William &apos;Fox&apos; Fallon is in charge of American military strategy for the most troubled parts of the world. Now, as the White House has been escalating the war of words with Iran, and seeming ever more determined to strike militarily before the end of this presidency, the admiral has urged restraint and diplomacy. Who will prevail, the president or the admiral?&quot;  &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/2008/03/05/fallon-bush-fire/&quot;&gt;Think Progress&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69646</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>Iran</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>MiddleEast</category>
		<category>Military</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A Solar Grand Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69158/A%2DSolar%2DGrand%2DPlan</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan&amp;amp;page=1"&gt;A Solar Grand Plan: By 2050 solar power could end U.S. dependence on foreign oil and slash greenhouse gas emissions.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/2/15/151252/412&quot;&gt;Gristmill&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt; Previously mentioned &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/68580/The-world-is-going-to-hell-in-a-hand-basket-I-feel-fine#1992373&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69158</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:16:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Energy</category>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>FossilFuels</category>
		<category>GlobalWarming</category>
		<category>GreenhouseGases</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Solar</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>America to the Rescue</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64085/America%2Dto%2Dthe%2DRescue</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/08/23/daily-show-three-generations-of-america-to-the-rescue/"&gt;Three Generations of &#8220;America to the Rescue.&#8221;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64085</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:55:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>BlowBack</category>
		<category>DailyShow</category>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>Humor</category>
		<category>Infrastructure</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>PleaseStandBy</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Terrorism</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>In Defense Of Foreign Policy Reptiles</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60403/In%2DDefense%2DOf%2DForeign%2DPolicy%2DReptiles</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/119680.html"&gt;Learning From Ike: What a Republican realist could teach George Bush.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;If we hope to succeed, we manage evil. We minimize, mitigate, and manipulate evil. But efforts to pre-emptively eliminate evil are prone to end in overreaction and destabilization, with consequences that are often worse than the original problem.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.60403</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:01:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>iran</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>nationaljournal</category>
		<category>neocon</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>realism</category>
		<category>reason</category>
		<dc:creator>Sticherbeast</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Clued-in people talking about the crazy world</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50866/Cluedin%2Dpeople%2Dtalking%2Dabout%2Dthe%2Dcrazy%2Dworld</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/"&gt;Passport&lt;/a&gt; is the name of a recently-launched blog written by the editors of Foreign Policy magazine, covering the same wide range of topics as the magazine itself does. Updated frequently and around the clock, informal and personal &#8212; I don&apos;t know if it&apos;s just because it&apos;s new, but they&apos;re doing a great job, and if you&apos;re a world politics and news junkie like me, it&apos;s fantastic.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50866</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 20:35:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>world</category>
		<dc:creator>blacklite</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A priest, a rabbi and a Hamas leader walk into a bar. .</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50615/A%2Dpriest%2Da%2Drabbi%2Dand%2Da%2DHamas%2Dleader%2Dwalk%2Dinto%2Da%2Dbar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/03/26/nefr26.xml&amp;amp;sSheet=/news/2006/03/26/ixhome.html"&gt;&quot;If Hamas fails to agree to a permanent ceasefire, we will have to create another leadership, just as we did before with Sheikh Yassin.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Former head of the double ISO (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mossad.gov.il/Mohr/MohrTopNav/MohrEnglish/MohrHistory/&quot;&gt;Mossad&lt;/a&gt;), Efraim Halevy Spoke at the&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.meforum.org/ &quot;&gt; Middle East Forum&lt;/a&gt; in Boston last week (yes, he&apos;s selling a &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.telegraph.co.uk/BerteShopWeb/viewProduct.do?ISBN=0297848313&quot;&gt;book&lt;/a&gt;) and had some interesting things to say.
Earlier post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/42036&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
(More inside).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50615</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 17:37:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>hamas</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>israel</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>mossad</category>
		<category>palestine</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>Smedleyman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Year of Living Utopianly</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/44725/The%2DYear%2Dof%2DLiving%2DUtopianly</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3193"&gt;The Utopian Nightmare&lt;/a&gt; : &quot;What is utopianism? It is promising more than you can deliver. It is seeing an easy and sudden answer to long-standing, complex problems. It is trying to solve everything at once through an administrative apparatus headed by &#8220;world leaders.&#8221; It places too much faith in altruistic cooperation and underestimates self-seeking behavior and conflict. It is expecting great things from schemes designed at the top, but doing nothing to solve the bigger problems at the bottom.&quot;

&lt;small&gt;Also, be sure to check out the the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/files/story3158.php&quot;&gt;16 ideas, values and institutions that may not be with us 35 years from now&lt;/a&gt; written by a variety of interesting people and compiled as part of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foreignpolicy.com&quot;&gt;Foreign Policy&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; 35th anniversary (although not all are free or available without registration).&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.44725</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:49:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>africa</category>
		<category>aid</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>g8</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>utopianism</category>
		<dc:creator>loquax</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A Spreading Treason</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42262/A%2DSpreading%2DTreason</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=6068"&gt;A Spreading Treason&lt;/a&gt; The vagaries of U.S. involvement in the Middle East were surely brought home to First Lady Laura Bush on her recent trip to Israel, on a tour of Jerusalem&apos;s holiest sites. At the Wailing Wall, where she placed a note in the Western Wall &#8211; as is the custom &#8211; she faced surly throngs of protesters shouting &quot;Free Pollard Now!&quot; The Pollardites also showed up earlier that morning, as Mrs. Bush paid a visit to the home of Israeli President Moshe Katsav: &quot;Pollard, the people are with you!&quot; they chanted.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42262</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 07:43:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>Israel</category>
		<category>JonathanPollard</category>
		<category>MiddleEast</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Pollard</category>
		<category>spy</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>mk1gti</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Q &amp;amp; A with former Israeli Mossad chief Efraim Halevy.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42036/Q%2Dand%2DA%2Dwith%2Dformer%2DIsraeli%2DMossad%2Dchief%2DEfraim%2DHalevy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/QA.jhtml?qaNo=125"&gt;Q &amp; A with former Israeli Mossad chief Efraim Halevy.&lt;/a&gt; Halevy fields questions from readers around the world. See also his article &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=568076&quot;&gt;The coming Pax Americana&lt;/a&gt;&quot;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42036</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 15:04:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iran</category>
		<category>israel</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>mossad</category>
		<category>palestine</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>ori</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>An Interview with Chalmers Johnson, Parts 1 &amp;amp; 2</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37390/An%2DInterview%2Dwith%2DChalmers%2DJohnson%2DParts%2D1%2Dand%2D2</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;If we were having this conversation in 1985, and I had said to you, &#8220;Four years from now the Soviet Union will collapse and in six years it will disappear,&#8221; you would have thought, &#8220;This is not a reliable observer.&#8221; But the U.S.S.R. is gone -- disappeared -- and we didn&#8217;t predict it. Russia today is a much smaller country than the former Soviet Union. The CIA had all the wrong data. We also made a mistake when we concluded that we had won the Cold War. We had almost nothing to do with what happened in the Soviet Union: there were internal issues and it certainly wasn&#8217;t Star Wars. We now know in detail how Gorbachev brought Sakharov out of exile in Gorky to address the Politburo on, &#8220;What would you do about a ballistic missile defense?&#8221; Sakharov said, &#8220;It&#8217;s easy to overwhelm it with missiles. I wouldn&#8217;t spend a ruble on it.&#8221; And they didn&#8217;t. But in mistakenly thinking that we won the Cold War, we strongly imply that we did something to cause that. Instead, the Soviet Union collapsed because of overstretch, a case of imperial overstretch.&lt;/small&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inmotionmagazine.com/global/cj_int/cj_int1.html&quot; title=&quot;Interview with Chalmers Johnson: Part 1&quot;&gt; An Empire of More Than 725 Military Bases&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; An interview with Chalmers Johnson, author of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20011015&amp;s=johnson&quot; title=&quot;Ten years ago, the other so-called superpower, the former Soviet Union, disappeared almost overnight because of internal contradictions, imperial overstretch and an inability to reform. We have always been richer, so it might well take longer for similar contradictions to afflict our society. But it is nowhere written that the United States, in its guise as an empire dominating the world, must go on forever. &quot;&gt;Blowback &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanempireproject.com/bookpage.asp?ISBN=0805070044&quot; title=&quot;Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic&quot;&gt;The Sorrows Of Empire&lt;/a&gt; (More Inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37390</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 11:38:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Blowback</category>
		<category>ChalmersJohnson</category>
		<category>empire</category>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Power of Media?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36574/The%2DPower%2Dof%2DMedia</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/davis200410211043.asp&quot;&gt;The Power of Nightmares&lt;/a&gt; sets out to claim that the Islamists and the neocons are, in reality, soul mates. Fact or fiction? Check out this series from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/3951615.stm&quot;&gt;BBC&lt;/a&gt; using this handy &lt;a href=&quot;http://response.pure360.com/_act/link.php?mId=pure73991038458583594&amp;tId=176255&quot;&gt;Bit&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://response.pure360.com/_act/link.php?mId=pure73991038458583594&amp;tId=176256&quot;&gt;Torrent&lt;/a&gt;!
&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;[Via: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.popbitch.com&quot;&gt;PopBitch&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36574</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:03:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>foreign</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>islamists</category>
		<category>neocons</category>
		<category>neoconservatives</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>popbitch</category>
		<dc:creator>DrDoberman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Anti-Americanism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35615/AntiAmericanism</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/files/story2670.php&quot;&gt;The World&apos;s Most Dangerous Ideas&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;i&gt;U.S. and European goals on most issues are quite similar. Both want a peaceful world free from terror, with open trade, growing freedom, and civilized codes of conduct. A Europe that charts its own course just to mark its differences from the United States threatens to fracture global efforts&#8212;whether on trade, proliferation, or the Middle East. Europe is too disunited to achieve its goals without the United States; it can only ensure that America&#8217;s plans don&#8217;t succeed. The result will be a world that muddles along, with the constant danger that unattended problems will flare up disastrously. Instead of win-win, it will be lose-lose&#8212;for Europe, for the United States, and for the world.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35615</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:02:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>europe</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>internationalpolitics</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>gd779</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Kerry Faces the World</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34154/Kerry%2DFaces%2Dthe%2DWorld</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2004/07/marshall.htm"&gt;This month, in &lt;i&gt;The Atlantic Monthly&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/&quot;&gt;Talking Points Memo&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; Joshua Micah Marshall writes an interesting article discussing the potential aspects of Kerry&apos;s foreign policy. The article itself is thought-provoking and erudite, and of equal if not more interest is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2004_06_27.php#003114&quot;&gt;3-part interview&lt;/a&gt; with &lt;a href=&quot;http://biden.senate.gov/&quot;&gt;Senator Joseph Biden&lt;/a&gt; (D) of Delaware, ranking  member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2004_06_27.php#003118&quot;&gt;Part One is here&lt;/a&gt;, with Parts Two and Three to be released later this week. Biden speaks about foreign policy in an overbearing, yet refreshingly intelligent, articulate, analytical manner.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34154</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2004 22:07:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>atlanticmonthly</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>interviews</category>
		<category>joebiden</category>
		<category>johnkerry</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>lazaruslong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>assess your global beliefs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29252/assess%2Dyour%2Dglobal%2Dbeliefs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://americanchoices.org/"&gt;American Choices&lt;/a&gt; is a pretty cool new site that guides you through a series of questions aimed at telling you where you stand in terms of foreign policy philosophy. It reminds me a lot of &lt;a href=&quot;http://selectsmart.com/PRESIDENT/&quot;&gt;the Selectsmart presidental voting thing&lt;/a&gt; that matches you up with a candidate.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29252</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:03:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>quizzes</category>
		<category>surveys</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Breaking the silence</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28492/Breaking%2Dthe%2Dsilence</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://pilger.carlton.com/print"&gt;Breaking the silence&lt;/a&gt; Last night ITV1 in the UK ran a documentary that is unlikely to be shown in the USA. It is by a respected journalist called John Pilger and amongst other tidbits it shows Colin Powell saying in 1991 that Iraq poses no threat and also Condoleeza Rice confirming the same thing. It also quotes some US officials that the current bunch who seem to be running US foreign policy were known during the administration of Bush senior as &quot;the crazies&quot;. Plus much more.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28492</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2003 05:45:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>colinpowell</category>
		<category>condoleezarice</category>
		<category>documentary</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>interviews</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>donfactor</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Frontier Psychology</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25467/Frontier%2DPsychology</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.jcpa.org/dje/books/am-ch3.htm"&gt;Frontier Psychology&lt;/a&gt; - Does Frontier Psychology drive America in a direction that the rest of the world cannot comprehend?  Roughly defined as &quot;&lt;i&gt;the effort on the part of Americans to come to grips with untamed elements of nature and, by taming them, to reorganize their society&lt;/i&gt;&quot;  We see it everywhere, even in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ivyweb.net/btvs/fictionary/essays/010929A_DED.htm&quot;&gt;Buffy&lt;/a&gt;.   Europe appears to value stability over mobility and change, in opposition to America.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wesleyan.edu/wesmaps/course9900/faculty/slotkin231.htm&quot;&gt;Prof. Richard Slotkin&lt;/a&gt; has written extensively about these concepts.  An interiew with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulagordon.com/shows/slotkin/&quot;&gt;audio clips is here&lt;/a&gt;. (Real)
&lt;br&gt;
Are America&apos;s recent domestic and international policy decisions attempts to tame &quot;untamed elements&quot; around it?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25467</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:45:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>Buffy</category>
		<category>BuffyTheVampireSlayer</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>FrontierPsychology</category>
		<category>JerusalemCenterForPublicAffairs</category>
		<category>PoliticalCulture</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>RichardSlotkin</category>
		<dc:creator>Argyle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>French Muslims Influence Government Policy on Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23663/French%2DMuslims%2DInfluence%2DGovernment%2DPolicy%2Don%2DIraq</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.arabia.com/newsfeed/article/english/0,14183,371641,00.html"&gt;French Muslims Influence Government Policy on Iraq&lt;/a&gt; This piece from an on-line Arab source helps us to understand the French reluctance to want a war with Iraq.  And you thought it was only about French oil interests, but non.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23663</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:22:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>France</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>Muslims</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Direct action</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23256/Direct%2Daction</link>
		<description> It seems that there is  some disconnection between the foreign policies of the American administration and the beliefs of a significant part of the population. In many countries, direct action is seen as a normal response. Will that happen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.warstrike.org/&quot; _self&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;? Or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.targetoil.com/&quot; _self&gt; here&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23256</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:23:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>action</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>direct</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>protest</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Nicolae Carpathia</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20498/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://inside.c-spanarchives.org:8080/cspan/cspan.csp?command=dprogram&amp;record=158378724&quot;&gt;US Foreign Policy Goals&lt;/a&gt; - Condoleeza Rice.  Only $29.95 from C-SPAN, well worth it. Will clear up many misconceptions. Unfortunately, thanks to macho chest thumping and grunting by prominent talking heads on camera, the Rice message &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theonion.com/onion3836/bush_seeks_un_support.html&quot;&gt;isn&apos;t getting across&lt;/a&gt;. (Free transcripts instead of $29.95 tapes might help.) Intelligent criticism of the sea change in foreign policy, from elder statesman &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hillnews.com/issues/092502/kennan.shtm&quot;&gt;George Kennan.&lt;/a&gt; What good does it do us to have information available on the web if we can&apos;t afford to buy it?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20498</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2002 08:02:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>condoleezarice</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>georgekennan</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>sheauga</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16189/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.foreignpolicy-infocus.org/papers/02right/index.html"&gt;U.S. Foreign Policy:  Attention! Right Face!  Forward, &lt;i&gt;March&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;/a&gt; &quot;...with no foreign policy experience, Dubya was essentially a blank slate, and U.S. foreign policy has been up for grabs since he took the oath of office. As everyone now knows, the main contestants consisted of two factions: one headed by Secretary of State Colin Powell, who represents continuity of policy with both Bush&apos;s father and Clinton; the other, led by Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney, whose vision is far more sweeping, not to say Manichean. Since September 11, the latter faction has emerged as dominant and is using the &apos;war against terrorism&apos; to impose its own, quite radical ideas on U.S. foreign policy and the global order. At their core, those ideas call for a world order based on U.S. supremacy and enforced by U.S. military power--a unipolar world in which the U.S. imposes the rules but, because of its own self-evident goodness, is not necessarily bound by them.&quot;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Ah, not quite &lt;i&gt;lebensraum&lt;/i&gt; (yet), but &quot;benevolent&quot; &lt;i&gt;Bushists&lt;/i&gt; bearing &lt;i&gt;bratwurst&lt;/i&gt; abound.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16189</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2002 13:15:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dubya</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>waronterrorism</category>
		<category>worldorder</category>
		<dc:creator>fold_and_mutilate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16088/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60208-2002Apr4.html"&gt;Bush plays peacemaker.  &lt;/a&gt; Having refused to honor several international treaties since taking office, the Bush administration sees itself as a legitimate peace broker.  Opinions solicited, is this likely to improve the situation or cause it to deteriorate further?  


 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16088</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2002 15:11:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>peace</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>treaties</category>
		<category>treaty</category>
		<dc:creator>jack-o</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


