<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with framing</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/framing</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'framing' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 11:10:21 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 11:10:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>United States surrenders, terror, drugs win.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81662/United%2DStates%2Dsurrenders%2Dterror%2Ddrugs%2Dwin</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/24/AR2009032402818.html"&gt;Without much fanfare, the Global War on Terror has ended.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123845123690371231.html&quot;&gt;The new name for these military interventions is the Overseas Contingency Operation.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=4385&quot;&gt;Press Q&amp;amp;A.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://cornyn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ForPress.NewsReleases&amp;ContentRecord_id=3edad98d-802a-23ad-417d-4403efacc7f9&amp;Region_id=247c449a-bb33-018c-0de4-ce6f8c711696&amp;Issue_id=&amp;IsTextOnly=True&quot;&gt;Some&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://hoekstra.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=117469&quot;&gt;Republican&lt;/a&gt; representatives &lt;a href=&quot;http://rsc.tomprice.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=121694&quot;&gt;discuss&lt;/a&gt;. (SPOILER: They are not pleased.) &lt;a href=&quot;http://usacac.leavenworth.army.mil/BLOG/blogs/dlro/archive/2009/04/01/are-we-at-war-or-not.aspx&quot;&gt;Military&lt;/a&gt; blogs &lt;a href=&quot;http://usacac.leavenworth.army.mil/BLOG/blogs/reflectionsfromfront/archive/2009/03/26/gwot-or-oco-what-s-in-a-name.aspx&quot;&gt;discuss&lt;/a&gt;. Similarly, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124225891527617397.html&quot;&gt;War on Drugs&lt;/a&gt; also looks to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2009/05/drug_czar_ends.php&quot;&gt;on the way out&lt;/a&gt;, though no new name for the project has been announced at this time.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81662</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 11:10:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>framing</category>
		<category>names</category>
		<category>pr</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>publicrelations</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>warondrugs</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>TheOnlyCoolTim</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Oh Dear&quot;-ism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80728/Oh%2DDearism</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doKHQZobymg"&gt;Adam Curtis on the rise of &quot;Oh Dearism&quot; in television news.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[SLYT, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globaldashboard.org/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80728</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:18:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Activism</category>
		<category>AdamCurtis</category>
		<category>CharlieBrooker</category>
		<category>Framing</category>
		<category>Hippies</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>Media</category>
		<category>News</category>
		<category>Newswipe</category>
		<category>OhDearism</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Negating a frame activates that frame</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74847/Negating%2Da%2Dframe%2Dactivates%2Dthat%2Dframe</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.alternet.org/election08/98453/dont_think_of_a_maverick_could_the_obama_campaign_be_improved/?page=entire"&gt;Don&apos;t Think of a Maverick!&lt;/a&gt; George &lt;a href=&quot;http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/people/person_detail.php?person=21&quot;&gt;Lakoff&lt;/a&gt; offers some tips on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/projects/strategic/simple_framing/&quot;&gt;framing&lt;/a&gt; to the Obama campaign.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74847</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:46:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Election</category>
		<category>Frames</category>
		<category>Framing</category>
		<category>Lakoff</category>
		<category>Language</category>
		<category>Maverick</category>
		<category>McCain</category>
		<category>Obama</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>No Right Turn</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58645/No%2DRight%2DTurn</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nascar.com/2006/news/headlines/cup/01/12/car_of_tomorrow_test/index.html"&gt;NASCAR as an example of a meritocracy with equal opportunity for all.&lt;/a&gt; While frequently maligned for it&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://auto.howstuffworks.com/nascar.htm&quot; title=&quot;relatively primitive technology&quot;&gt;relatively primitive technology&lt;/a&gt; (excluding &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.howstuffworks.com/nascar-safety.htm&quot; title=&quot;safety&quot;&gt;safety&lt;/a&gt; ), the total lack of mechanical resemblance (other than appearance) of the &quot;stock&quot; cars to the brand they represent, soap-opera-slash-professional wrestling story lines, and being ripe political target for both &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/18/weekinreview/18macg.html?ex=1389762000&amp;en=9d4bca1f724a54f3&amp;ei=5007&amp;partner=USERLAND&quot; title=&quot;the right&quot;&gt;the right&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blpic-moran.htm&quot; title=&quot;the left&quot;&gt;the left&lt;/a&gt; as well as &lt;a href=&quot;http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=476206&quot; title=&quot;marketers&quot;&gt;marketers&lt;/a&gt;, it is a strong cultural force. The entrance of Toyota (&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6202545.stm&quot; title=&quot;likely to surpass GM as #2 US automaker&quot;&gt;likely to surpass GM as #2 US automaker&lt;/a&gt; in the near-future) into &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nascar.com/&quot; title=&quot;NASCAR&quot;&gt;NASCAR&lt;/a&gt; (with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/business/16704395.htm&quot; title=&quot;hopes&quot;&gt;hopes&lt;/a&gt; of &quot;winning on Sunday and &lt;a href=&quot;http://marketplace.publicradio.org/shows/2007/02/15/AM200702152.html&quot; title=&quot;selling&quot;&gt;selling&lt;/a&gt; on Monday&quot; in the heartland) and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/racing/02/14/waltrip.ap/?cnn=yes&quot; title=&quot;cheating scandal&quot;&gt;cheating scandal&lt;/a&gt; currently unravelling highlight an important concept woven into NASCAR&apos;s culture.   [more]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58645</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:51:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>analogy</category>
		<category>competition</category>
		<category>frameshop</category>
		<category>framing</category>
		<category>meritocracy</category>
		<category>metaphor</category>
		<dc:creator>rzklkng</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Lakoff 1, Pinker 0</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55874/Lakoff%2D1%2DPinker%2D0</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.powells.com/biblio?show=HARDCOVER:NEW:0374158282:23.00&amp;page=authorsnote#page&quot;&gt;George Lakoff&lt;/a&gt; responds to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.powells.com/review/2006_10_19&quot;&gt;Steven Pinker&#8217;s review&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;em&gt;Whose Freedom?&lt;/em&gt;. Highlights include charges of deception and incompetence on both sides.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55874</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:09:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cognitivescience</category>
		<category>framing</category>
		<category>lakoff</category>
		<category>linguistics</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>pinker</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>anotherpanacea</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Was it Lakoff, or the Trytophan ?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37172/Was%2Dit%2DLakoff%2Dor%2Dthe%2DTrytophan</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/research/lakoff/howtorespond"&gt;Lakoff say - mellow frames sooth savage Thanksgiving :&lt;/a&gt; The guru of framing offers a handy free excerpt from his all-the-rage book, just in time to defuse tense Thanksgiving dinner situations ( All fall asleep - Lakoff or the turkey ? ). Says Penny Kolb, on the practical magic of Lakoff&apos;s approach : &lt;i&gt;&quot;....By last night, the chat room was civil. An amazing (to me) number of posters turned off their capitalization and we were actually having conversations.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37172</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:53:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>discussion</category>
		<category>Election2004</category>
		<category>FrameTheDebate</category>
		<category>framing</category>
		<category>Progressive</category>
		<category>Rockridge</category>
		<category>RockridgeInstitute</category>
		<category>TalkingPoints</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Heathers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32982/Heathers</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2004_05_02_dneiwert_archive.html#108390182327224560"&gt;David Neiwert&lt;/a&gt; writes a thoughtful piece about how utterly corrupt the press is and adds to the long running mefi discussion about why &quot;framing&quot; works for conservatives:  &quot;But even beyond the bias is the way this framing really corrupts and trivializes the national debate, so that we find ourselves constantly arguing about the &quot;morality&quot; or &quot;character&quot; of politicians, an issue that is by nature a product of spin and propagandizing. This has never been more clear than in the current election, when the &quot;character&quot; of a pampered fraternity party boy who couldn&apos;t be bothered to serve out his term in the National Guard and who went on to fail miserably at every business venture he touched is successfully depicted as that of a sincere and patriotic regular guy, while that of a three-time Purple Heart winner who voluntarily left Yale to serve in Vietnam, and whose ensuing three decades of public service have been a model of principle and consistency, is somehow depicted as belonging to a spineless elitist.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32982</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2004 09:02:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>davidneiwert</category>
		<category>framing</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>orcinus</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>press</category>
		<dc:creator>McBain</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What&apos;s in a frame? well........</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30729/Whats%2Din%2Da%2Dframe%2Dwell</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/10/27_lakoff.shtml"&gt;George Lakoff tells how conservatives use language to dominate politics&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Why do conservatives appear to be so much better at framing? - &lt;i&gt;Because they&apos;ve put billions of dollars into it&lt;/i&gt;. Over the last 30 years their think tanks have made a heavy investment in ideas and in language. In 1970, [Supreme Court Justice] &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediatransparency.org/stories/powellmanifesto.htm&quot;&gt;Lewis Powell wrote a fateful memo&lt;/a&gt; to the National Chamber of Commerce....He outlined the whole thing in 1970. They set up the Heritage Foundation in 1973&quot; &lt;i&gt;&quot;So if you go on Fox News....and the question is, &apos;Are you in favor of the President&#8217;s tax relief program or are you against it?&apos; -- it doesn&apos;t matter what you say. If you say, &apos;I&#8217;m against tax relief,&apos; you&apos;re still evoking that framing. you&apos;re still in their frame...&quot;&lt;/i&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;George Lakoff, a professor of linguistics and cognitive science at the University of California Berkeley, is a specialist in the technique of &quot;framing,&quot; a communication tool that creates a &quot;frame&quot; for a message that defines the terms of the debate.&quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buzzflash.com/interviews/04/01/int04003.html&quot;&gt;Interview with Lakoff&lt;/a&gt; )  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30729</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:35:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>berkeley</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<category>framing</category>
		<category>georgelakoff</category>
		<category>linguistics</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Conservatives are from Mars, Liberals... aw screw it, just read the post</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24458/Conservatives%2Dare%2Dfrom%2DMars%2DLiberals%2Daw%2Dscrew%2Dit%2Djust%2Dread%2Dthe%2Dpost</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_Politics"&gt;Conservatives and Liberals obviously think differently.&lt;/a&gt; Here&apos;s how. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linguistics.berkeley.edu/lingdept/Current/people/facpages/lakoffg.html&quot;&gt;George Lakoff&lt;/a&gt;, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lakoff/lakoff_p1.html&quot;&gt;highly respected linguist&lt;/a&gt; and author of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0226468054/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know and Liberals Don&apos;t&lt;/a&gt; is tipping. Why? Part of it is that while Lakoff is obviously a Liberal, he&apos;s one of the few around to have taken the time to understand that Conservatives, too, have a coherent worldview. He&apos;s then added to that, er, insight his neuroscientific understanding of the power of metaphor in human communication. He&apos;s getting mad buzz right now, I just heard him lecture, and folks, Conservative or Liberal, this guy&apos;s ideas are worth exploring.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24458</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 21:51:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>framing</category>
		<category>Lakoff</category>
		<category>metaphors</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>AlexSteffen</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


