<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with france and law</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/france+law</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'france' and 'law' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:40:03 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:40:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Truth in (French Fasion) Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85294/Truth%2Din%2DFrench%2DFasion%2DAdvertising</link>
		<description> Campaigning MP Val&amp;#0233;rie Boyer, a member of Nicolas Sarkozy&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_for_a_Popular_Movement&quot;&gt;UMP&lt;/a&gt; party, has put forth another controversial bill to address the role of the fashion industry media in portraying healthy body images. Boyer, who wrote a government report on anorexia and obesity, is currently proposing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iML0zRddZWVO455wW8MPBJ1GHp4A&quot;&gt;&quot;health warnings&quot; on digitally altered photographs of people&lt;/a&gt;, stating that the image was &quot;digitally enhanced to modify a person&#8217;s body image.&quot; The previous bill supported by Boyer and others came in April 2008, when France&apos;s lower house of parliament passed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0417/p01s02-woeu.html&quot;&gt;a bill that would make it a crime to promote &quot;excessive thinness&quot; or extreme dieting,&lt;/a&gt;. The bill would empower judges to punish with prison terms and fines of up to &#8364;45,000 any publication (including blogs), modeling agency, or fashion designer who &quot;incites&quot; anorexia. That bill, which followed closely after &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2008/04/09/french_fashion_industry_against_anorexia/&quot;&gt;key members of the French fashion industry signed a government-backed charter&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.connexionfrance.com/news_articles.php?id=91&quot;&gt;came under fire&lt;/a&gt; from fashion designers and some politicians.  French fashion and politics weren&apos;t at the front of this effort, with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/09/13/spain.models/index.html&quot;&gt;Madrid&apos;s fashion week turning away underweight models&lt;/a&gt; in 2006, facing concerns that girls and young women were trying to copy their rail-thin looks and developing eating disorders.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85294</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:40:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anorexia</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>fashion</category>
		<category>France</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>touch-up</category>
		<category>UMP</category>
		<category>ValerieBoyer</category>
		<dc:creator>filthy light thief</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>For whom these vile shackles, These long-prepared irons?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41490/For%2Dwhom%2Dthese%2Dvile%2Dshackles%2DThese%2Dlongprepared%2Dirons</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.allpeers.com/blog/?page_id=113"&gt;Vive la Revolution.&lt;/a&gt; Are DVD Copy Protection technologies now illegal in France? (via techdirt).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41490</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:08:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyprotection</category>
		<category>dvd</category>
		<category>france</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<dc:creator>seanyboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The House passes constitutional ammendment banning flag burning</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26186/The%2DHouse%2Dpasses%2Dconstitutional%2Dammendment%2Dbanning%2Dflag%2Dburning</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-flag04.html"&gt;Flag-burning amendment passes the House?&lt;/a&gt; Yeah it&apos;s highly unlikley this will pass the Senate which is good.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/01/27/wfra27.xml&quot;&gt;I can&apos;t say the same for are friends the French who&apos;s government just passed a law to jail or fine anyone who insults the flag let alone burn it.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26186</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2003 09:34:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amendment</category>
		<category>flagburning</category>
		<category>France</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>ZupanGOD</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8991/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/newsid_1437000/1437335.stm"&gt;French retards can sue their birth doctors for not killing them in the womb...&lt;/a&gt; I thought the link I posted about a woman suing her boss when she crashed her car after driving home drunk from a staff party was the height of lawsuit insanity, but this takes the cake: in France, if you are seriously disabled, you have the right to sue a doctor who failed to recommend an abortion to your mother....

.... Homosaywhat?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8991</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2001 08:49:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>childbirth</category>
		<category>france</category>
		<category>french</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>handicapped</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>troll</category>
		<dc:creator>tweek!</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4961/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/12/25/french.anti.racist.idg/index.html"&gt;Yahoo appeals to U.S. District Court&lt;/a&gt; to avoid being regulated by the French government. This is one of the first important cases testing jurisdiction on ecommerce sites, and neither side appears to be backing down.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4961</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2000 20:53:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>auction</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>france</category>
		<category>jurisdiction</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>nazi</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>jed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1787/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,36504,00.html"&gt;Court orders Yahoo to block French access to Nazi memorabilia.&lt;/a&gt; Does it bother anyone else that the French courts think they can regulate an American business? I dislike Nazis as much as the next guy but this seems to be a bit much on the part of the French.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1787</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2000 11:29:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>France</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>memorabilia</category>
		<category>Nazi</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>darainwa</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


