<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with fuelefficiency</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/fuelefficiency</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'fuelefficiency' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:31:05 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:31:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>New US Fuel Economy Plan: Win, Lose, or Draw?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82015/New%2DUS%2DFuel%2DEconomy%2DPlan%2DWin%2DLose%2Dor%2DDraw</link>
		<description> Car companies were facing a variety of efficiency and emission standards throughout the United States, from the Department of Transportation, the Environmental Protection Agency, On May 19th, and then an even stricter emission standard from California and 13 other states (plus DC). On May 19th, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-on-national-fuel-efficiency-standards/&quot;&gt;President Obama announced nation-wide new vehicle fuel efficiency standards&lt;/a&gt; for new cars and trucks through 2016. The goal is to rapidly increase fuel efficiency,without compromising safety, by an average of 5, culminating in 39 MPG for cars and 30 MPG for light trucks. Currently, &lt;a href=&quot;http://jalopnik.com/5261242/no-automakers-meet-obamas-new-fuel-economy-standard&quot;&gt;no auto makers are meet the final standards&lt;/a&gt;, though some are closer than others. Car enthusiasts say &lt;a href=&quot;http://jalopnik.com/5261163/obama-kills-fun-cars-unveils-355-mpg-fuel-economy-plan-by-2016&quot;&gt;this is the end of &quot;fun cars,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; and point out &lt;a href=&quot;http://jalopnik.com/5265996/ballyhoed-new-cafe-standards-riddled-with-hummer+sized-loopholes&quot;&gt;air conditioning improvement short-cuts&lt;/a&gt; that would achieve the required goals. Environmentalists &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2009/05/20/no-climate-impact-from-new-national-fuel-efficiency-standards/&quot;&gt;say this won&apos;t change enough&lt;/a&gt;. The EPA says the unified standard is &lt;a href=&quot;http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/d0cf6618525a9efb85257359003fb69d/451902cb77d4add5852575bb006d3f9b!OpenDocument&quot;&gt;welcomed by the auto manufacturers&lt;/a&gt; because it provides regulatory certainty and predictability and includes flexibilities that will significantly reduce the cost of compliance (partially due to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rrstar.com/opinions/columnists/x313658688/Cars-What-we-need-vs-what-we-want&quot;&gt;fuel efficiency score covering an automaker&#8217;s entire fleet&lt;/a&gt;). Other people point out though the new standards &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/CARS/rules/CAFE/overview.htm&quot;&gt;are better than the old ones&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5i4FKKyrYx06UlibpGrblYpZN6ccQ&quot;&gt;auto fuel economy goal was reachable a decade ago&lt;/a&gt;, and still &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/letters/articles/2009/05/26/fuel_efficiency_rule_doesnt_go_extra_mile/&quot;&gt;SUVs are classified as light trucks&lt;/a&gt;. Then again, why wait for new standards when you can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cleanmpg.com/cmps_index.php?page=hypermiling&quot;&gt;start hypermiling today&lt;/a&gt;? It&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cleanmpg.com/forums/&quot;&gt;not limited to hybrids&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82015</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:31:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>FuelEfficiency</category>
		<category>Gas</category>
		<category>GHG</category>
		<category>GreenHouseGasses</category>
		<category>Hypermiling</category>
		<category>Oil</category>
		<category>Standards</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>filthy light thief</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>we heart electric bikes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73444/we%2Dheart%2Delectric%2Dbikes</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_efficiency_in_transportation#Walking&quot;&gt;Bicycles are the most efficient mode of transportation&lt;/a&gt;; walking is a distant second, followed by &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_efficiency_in_transportation#US_Passenger_transportation&quot;&gt;crowded vans and motorcycles&lt;/a&gt;, with everything else being relatively equal. This may change soon. WSJ online jokingly tests a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/07/19/wsj-tests-the-ohm-xu450-ebike/&quot;&gt;new plug-in electric bike versus a standard racing model&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73444</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 12:10:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>batterypower</category>
		<category>bicycle</category>
		<category>ebike</category>
		<category>electricbicycle</category>
		<category>fuelefficiency</category>
		<category>hybrid</category>
		<category>lithiumion</category>
		<category>moped</category>
		<category>pluginev</category>
		<category>transportation</category>
		<dc:creator>Brian B.</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15512/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23674-2002Mar13.html?referer=email"&gt;Oil makes the world go round.&lt;/a&gt; The Senate yesterday defeated an effort to increase fuel efficiency standards for cars, sport utility vehicles and pickup trucks by 50 percent over 13 years, voting instead for a measure backed by the auto industry.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15512</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:15:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>fuelefficiency</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>vehicles</category>
		<category>wapo</category>
		<dc:creator>semmi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14510/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://robots.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/02/05/green.vehicles/index.html&quot; target=&quot;self&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;How green is your car? &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;If it&apos;s the Honda Insight (at 57 MPG), it&apos;s very green... if it&apos;s the Dodge Ram 2500 Pickup (at 11 MPG), well, shame on you. Check out the &lt;b&gt;&quot;Green Book: The Environmental guide to Cars and Trucks&quot;&lt;/b&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14510</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2002 06:55:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>automobiles</category>
		<category>cars</category>
		<category>cnn</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>fuel</category>
		<category>fuelefficiency</category>
		<dc:creator>hotdoughnutsnow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


