<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with fw800</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/fw800</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'fw800' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 07:41:19 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 07:41:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Panther bites Firewire</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29391/Panther%2Dbites%2DFirewire</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.macfixit.com/"&gt;Panther Bites Firewire - users get burned.&lt;/a&gt; Reports continue to pour in about catastrophic data loss on external firewire drives among users of Mac OS 10.3 (Panther). Apple &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/macosx/firewire800specialmessage.html&quot;&gt;continues to insist&lt;/a&gt; that only FW 800 drives are affected, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macintouch.com/panfirewire.html&quot;&gt;numerous users of FW 400 drives report similar problems&lt;/a&gt;. (more inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29391</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 07:41:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>dataloss</category>
		<category>firewire</category>
		<category>firewiredrives</category>
		<category>fw400</category>
		<category>fw800</category>
		<category>mac</category>
		<category>os10.3</category>
		<category>panther</category>
		<dc:creator>stonerose</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


