<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with gaffes</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/gaffes</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'gaffes' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:18:01 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:18:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Etiquette Hell</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39024/Etiquette%2DHell</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.etiquettehell.com/"&gt;Etiquette Hell&lt;/a&gt; For those who throw good manners, common decency, and proper etiquette to the wind, here is a website collecting stories about social gaffes that are often hilarious.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39024</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:18:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>etiquette</category>
		<category>gaffes</category>
		<category>hell</category>
		<category>manners</category>
		<category>polite</category>
		<category>social</category>
		<dc:creator>livingsanctuary</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14940/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/business/newsid_1825000/1825593.stm"&gt;Did I say devaluation?&lt;/a&gt; Nothing important, just another presidential blunder that caused a bit of confussion among Japan traders. Here in Europe it&apos;s been all over the place in the news and I am surprised that that little detail has been absent of the main USA media. I&apos;m sure I didn&apos;t do my (online) homework well, could you please help me?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Maybe is that the European media jumps at every oportunity to ridiculize Bush? Or is the american media protecting Bush image &lt;i&gt;inside&lt;/i&gt; the USA?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Could things like this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A35664-2002Feb19.html&quot;&gt;controversial Pentagon plan&lt;/a&gt; be the beguinning of a New Media War? We begin by hidding the little things and then we&apos;ll go for bigger and bigger &lt;i&gt;blackouts&lt;/i&gt;, and then even lies?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14940</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2002 11:52:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>currency</category>
		<category>gaffes</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>japan</category>
		<category>trading</category>
		<category>yen</category>
		<dc:creator>samelborp</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


